Re: NEB
This will be totally different.
It will be throwing money at existing large companies that say the right buzz words.
I wonder how much of the $Bn for 5G and digital whatsit will just be given to BT
26124 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
>Propose a constitutional amendment that imposes term limits on all members of Congress.
So reformers (trouble makers) can be just ignored and will go away. The others won't have time to learn the ins-outs and so will be dependent on "special advisers"
>A five-year ban on White House and Congressional officials becoming lobbyists after they leave government service.
I'm not a lobbyist I just have occasional lunches with people. Or I am a consultant
>A lifetime ban on White House officials lobbying on behalf of a foreign government.
So would they be allowed to lobby on behalf of BRITISH Petroleum? What about Gasprom? What's the difference between Gasprom lobbying against sanctions and Putin doing it?
>A complete ban on foreign lobbyists raising money for American elections.
Including foreign companies? what about US companies with any foreign owners? So no public companies can donate money
>Personally I actually think these would improve the USG. Let's see which (if any) get implemented.
I think they would all make lots of money for compliance lawyers, consultants and advisers
>The UK's OS maps are (or were, in '84 when I last bought one) elegant and eminently fit-for-purpose. Wish we had the same kind of maps in the USA.
Well it's your own fault, if you insist on having a tantrum and storming out then you don't get to have nice things.
If you wish to invite the Ordnance Survey to tramp over your land armed with theodolites, marmite sandwiches and maps in little plastic cases around their necks then I'm sure they will be happy to do so.
> Hell, even US organizations can get EU certifications
That's not the point, we have certification.
But it is certified by a Notified Body in the Eu, currently our NB is in the UK which soon won't be in the Eu so can't be our notified body. Probably they will just move their office to Luxemburg and change their name.
But there is an uncertainty which is costing us time and money. So any company outside Europe that trades in Europe and uses a UK bank, accountant, lawyer, test lab, certification authority, notified body etc etc has to think about changing them now. And since nobody is going to sign up with any UK firm for these services in the next 2 years we have to worry about which of these will go bust before article 50 is finished.
We sell our US made product in the Eu, mostly in DACH (Germany Austria Switzerland) but like most English speaking companies our CE certification authority is in the UK.
Currently they can't say if they will be able to provide Eu certification in 2 years time.
2 years isn't very long in product lifecycle - especially in medical devices.
We are looking at either dumping them now for a German firm in the hope of transferring our existing design or risking suddenly having to recertify all our gear at some point in the near future.
Fortunately the UK market isn't rich enough for us to have to bother making a separate British approved model.
We don't need an FCC at all. The market will compete and decide a winner.
If I want to broadcast a 3G signal I can just buy a transmitter, if somebody else wants to use the same bit of spectrum they can compete by buying a bigger transmitter - not have to pay $Bn to some gubermint for the right to use.
The password is very closely guarded by every technician at every US and foreign customer airbase, everyone at Lockheed Martin and by everyone in the DoD - with so many people guarding the password it is very safe.
It might be useful if it was possible to change it from the default - but that would make the system more complicated
So the war could have been shortened by dropping battalions of management consultants and marketing executives to persuade the Germans to take a customer focussed agile manufacturing process - where the military changes their mind all the time and the kit is delivered late, obsolete and in much smaller numbers?
>but what's wrong with just making the loser of a case pay?
Because giant companies could spin their legal bills to astronomical numbers so if you lost they could claim you owed them $MM. They could demand that you paid some sort of bond upfront to cover their costs if you lost - since you can't afford this you can't sue any company that has in-house lawyers