How are they going to carry it?
On a line under the dorsal flight feathers ?
26124 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
>The Judiciary branch can state if the Executive branch break laws enacted by the Legislative branch.
So a bunch of liberal elite unelected judges can override the President who was elected in a landslide by more than 100% of the people (if you discount all those who illegally voted for the wrong woman)
Why would we bother hacking our enemies?
Unless there is a war what good does it do to know the Russian or Chinese military's secrets?
It would be far more valuable to be hacking the Eu ministries that will be negotiating Brexit or the US agencies that will be deciding on the tarrifs to place on the UK
Sorry, it's one of those acronyms that is impossible to type right, even when you know what it stands for and say it to yourself.
Still better than when they renamed SERC to PPARC and put the name on all the glass doors at the new office - without realising what the letters read as backward
There is terrorist activity in these countries now. His ban affects people born in those countries 50years ago.
Iranians who have lived in the USA since 1979 are unlikely to have moved there after the revolution because they were fans of a future anti-Iranian Sunni extremist terrorist group.
While it is unlikely that a programmer, driven mad by years of dealing with little-endian memory, will seek out the CEO of Intel. And I don't imagine there are many Samsung loyalists strapping Galaxy notes to themselves and trying to blow up Tim Cook
Mr Zuckerberg faces risks of mad right-wingers who think Facebook is part of a democrat conspiracy, mad left-wingers who think Facebook is a corporate invader of privacy. Then even madder even righter wingers who think he is a secret zionist conspiracy and even madder even lefter wingers who think it is a fascist government conspiracy.
Then there are all the people who are just driven mad by cat videos.
That's not the problem - the problem is the arbitrary nature of the order, no details, no legal opinion, no rules.
Did he intend this to stop British holiday makers in Costa Rica being able to fly home via Florida? Did it apply to US citizens? What about joint Canadian/US citizens? Nobody knows - it was upto individual officers to make a ruling.
Who knows what the next arbitrary ruling will say? All muslims on the no-fly list? Or just US citizens born in certain countries, or perhaps all foreign born Americans?
Or perhaps merely companies employing foreign born or muslims will be banned from government contracts or just defense contracts. So perhaps firms will have to start letting them go.
The childish reaction to the court ruling might make people worry. What if the next executive order is interpreted by some heavily armed branch of government as a "who will rid me of this turbulent priest"
Some is. Tata importing 1000s of "consultants" from India on company transfers or Disney replacing entire work forces with H1Bs
But there aren't 1000s of unemployed chip designers, physics lecturers, machine learning experts who would enter the labor force if only living wages were available.
Yes you CAN get those staff by paying more and outbidding somebody else and poaching their staff. But that doesn't work for the entire market - the US doesn't rely on foreign doctors because doctors are underpaid.
>The Famous Five series. Up until the day when I realised that each and every one of them has the same plot. Still, good times...
My objection was the geology. They were always finding tunnels and potholes that were always perfectly dry. They never had to wade through waist deep freezing water or have it continually dripping from the roof down their neck