Re: Exceptionalists always have issues with reality and nonsense
I don't - but I'm from Yorkshire and so I'm obviously better than everyone else.
26111 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
Strangely, I like my computers to not do anything unless requested.
So you would be happy with a botnet of millions of home devices crashing infrastructure until a million owners all conduct their own failure mode analysis and initiate their CAPA policy framework before deciding to update their hacked device?
Or he knew that the photo of him accepting the gun it would be on the front page after every future school shooting or everytime some politician blames the internet for gun violence.
This gives him a face-saving way of refusing the NRA 'gift' because he is too honest
Unfortunately you wont be nicked - that would allow you to question the evidence.
You will just be misidentified and go on a database. You were "seen" (to p=0.05) at a demo against an arms fair. You end up on a no-fly list or suddenly don't get that job at a firm that gets lots of government work.
You can't quite do one spot each day. This is in a 90minute orbit, so gets 18 slices of the Earth each day.
Since it only images a 5km wide swath you don't get very complete coverage - basically you get 5km wide lines 2000km apart. You can slowly precess the orbit so that you can fill in the coverage over any spot but that takes a while
the vendors should have started calling out warning signals knowing how bad it was progressing.
why ? That's the entire business model for this sort of project.
The vendors job is to deliver something that doesn't work but exactly meets all the specifications in the contract - then get paid 10x as much for "changes"
That's why the contract is 6000pages -
It means the current facebook is the last and only permanent one.
Anybody starting a competitor has to have enough lawyers on day 1 to screen all their content.
Somebody with an anonymous email address of zuck666 might even be tempted to post some content to get them shut down.
The reason we have lots of rules and laws restricting business is that they are written at the behest of currently successful businesses.
That has been tried:
One they must pay prevailing wages in the area
Add a requirement that they must know your own internal software, there are no local applicants so the prevailing wage is whatever you claim. Look on craigslist for job ads wanting php+cobol+matlab+VMS so they can get a market labor opinion that there are no local candidates.
Two they must pay $ $50,000 per person
Minus deductions for health care premiums, pension, flights home, housing costs, company store etc
Three lying on the h1-b1 visa is a five year felony
It is the candidate that applies and signs the visa. You actually want some low level of enforcement so you can hang a threat over the person.
can include up 10% of the companies income
Employee #12345 is employed by (and the sole employee of ) Tata services #12345 (Bermuda ), it has gross sales of that person's income.
Call me old fashioned, but I believe a company based in the US, should be hiring predominantly from the local labor pool,
And customers should do the same, nobody outside America should buy American software or cars or watch american tv shows
Confession time.
In college we rented the normal "young ones" shared house and the ignition in the gas cooker stopped working after a few weeks.
A group of physics/engineering/math undergraduates tried to guess how it worked - piezo-electric button, catalytic from gas+air cell, thermocouple and a capacitor ?)
At the end of the year somebody looked under the cooker (not like we ever cleaned) and said "hey there's a battery here!"
At least all Maplin's stock is hand made in the UK not imported from China
Shops are rent seeking middlemen. The reason we have had to pay a markup to merchants for the last 1000years is that is was difficult to pop down to the spice islands for your pepper.
Now that it is as easy for the end user to buy from the chinese as manufacturer as it is for the retailer - we don't need the retailer taking a cut.
But you only save these costs if you have other paying customers that you are turning down. I don't know the details of Mars Rover, but unless they are paying for commercial services then cutting a small % usage of infrastructure that you own rarely saves the money it shows on the accountants spreadsheet