Re: Eliminate any pedestrian humans
We already eliminate any pedestrian humans from the taxiways by having big jet engines to Hoover them up
26130 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
but the braking distance of a car is not reduced at all by having motors, as the limit is already defined by the tyre/road interaction
Is that necessarily true ? Why do supercars have huge actively cooled carbon fibre discs?
I was thinking that if a Tesla can do 0-60 in <3s with the torque of the motors then assuming the battery can absorb electricity at the same rate it should be able to actively brake at the same rate ( a little better since aerodynamics are working for you)
The USA typically has about 2x higher auto fatality rate compared to other developed countries - mostly because of low seatbelt use (although it is improving)
The rate for pedestrian injuries is lower - mostly because there are fewer pedestrians/cyclists in US cities and more commute miles are driven on freeways with no pedestrians.
It is one of genuine objections to autonomous vehicles in a European city (rather than LA or Arizona).
If the car has to brake everytime a child wanders near the kerb edge of the pavement, or if a delivery vehicle is illegally parked and it refuses to cross a solid white line to get round them - then the whole of London is going to be gridlocked by autonomous vehicles obeying the rules.
I'm just saying that there is a practical limit to the "driver should always be able to stop".
If with perfect reflexes +perfect brakes I can stop from 30mph in 6 car lengths, then the kid is safe if they step out 6 cars ahead of me but not 4. So speed limit in school zones is 20mph = 4 car lengths. But what if they step out 2 cars ahead of me? Should I have been going 10mph? What about 1 car length?
You soon end up in Xeno's commute where I get asymptotically slower as I approach the front bumper of a parked car
it's the driver's responsibility to not drive into pedestrians
But sometimes it's not the drivers fault.
UK official stopping distance at 30mph is 23m, if a small child runs out into the road 1m in front of my car then it may be my responsibility to avoid them but the laws of physics disagree.
Ironically we may end up with new stopping distance rules that ONLY robot cars can comply with - eg. thinking time is now <1ms and stopping distance requires 4wheel drive DC motors + ABS.
If it was me I wouldn't even open email and would demand that all future work requests are delivered in person by a company director accompanied by corporate legal council.
I need ensure that all instructions by somebody who appears to be my supervisor (pending DNA tests) are approved by shareholders
our 5-eyes and RU friends are particularly interested in traffic that goes through various tunnels
That's the wonderful irony of allowing ISPs to sell your information.
It used to only be pirates, paranoids and peruses of particularly pernicious pron that used VPNs - now everybody does. It's hard work spying on people when everyone looks like a suspect
I pay for PIA but use their openVPN servers.
Mainly because their windows client used to start a pair of Ruby interpreters that ran at 100% CPU and killed the battery life on my laptop.
Technically is there any reason to use their own propriety system rather than their openVPN service?
ps. I only need "stop my ISP marketing my browsing" level of security, I do my breaking into the Kremlin from work
Essentially none.
The reason for keeping the 737 tag is partly brand awareness but also it's easier to make a change to the same airframe and submit a "note to file" than to get approval for a new model. You only have to test/prove the new change, not revisit existing features that are already approved
Eventually there are no original parts but you still filling incremental changes to the FAA.
You know, Samantha puts in a lot of hard work on this round and she gets a bit fed up with silly comments about the way she 'checks the teams' 7 inchers' or 'pulls out my reproduction equipment and twists my knob'. Samantha tells me she tries to take no notice of these pathetic, purile critics, but it isn't always easy to ignore her knockers.
You get off the plane. If you are told to stand in a line, you stand in a line.
True if you are going to Florida for 2 weeks - less true on a business trip.
As a Brit on a visa waiver you can go to America to:
1, Install or maintain imported equipment - but not assemble it
2, Observe and advise a US employee - but not supervise them
3, Conduct training - but not receive training.
4, Attend a conference or trade show, but not any educational sessions
And these are the official rules to the "are you coming here to work" question.
Not including the "you look a bit muslim" factor
US immigration/import checks operate by the book.
No they don't - they operate by the whim of the minimum wage / minimum education person in the booth.
Even the law says things like "if in their opinion..."
I have been refused entry because they thought the green carbon copy of the visa should be in the passport not the pink one. And I'm white, English and a professor.
It makes it increasingly difficult to do business in the US, if any foreign employees (especially any that don't look like typical country and western audience) have to worry that they wont be let back in after a holiday or business trip.
Of course this doesn't affect the slave labour Tata H1Bs who don't get to take holidays or business trips -
What happens in a monopoly market if the government hands out £3k vouchers for new customers?
a, £3k was all BT needed to finally decide the internet was here to stay
b, Business that would be the next Facebook if only they had £3k are now created
c, BT increases their installation charge by £3k
d, BT increases their installation charge by £4k
does not require Canada to bend over and take whatever the EU feels like giving at the time
No but it does require that all my systems are CEmarked, meet Eu labeling, recycling and origin requirements. I have to have a notified body in the Eu and meet exactly the same requirements as a manufacturer in the Eu.
I can't chose to "diverge" from those rules. In fact I world prefer that people converged. At the moment the USA and Eu have different sub parts of IEC60601 which is costing me a headache in buying components.
1 An A.I. system must be subject to the full gamut of laws that apply to its human operator
That's the issue.
This isn't about AI weapons a'la skynet.
This is about a completely black box CDNN being fed business data back to 1871 and deciding that only hiring white candidates with double barrelled names who went to Oxbridge is the best fit to the data.
Or it noticing that there were no performing loans to women for the first 75% of the data set so it makes sense to refuse all women's mortgage applications
At the moment claiming "the computer says no" proves that you weren't discriminating
Hi, we're from Apple. Here's a suitcase full of money, please kill that bill.
Why? Apple can offer to repair the phone for a fee they like at one of their stores
While blocking imports of all phones that don't have any instate approved repair facilities and parts suppliers as required by the bill