Re: RIP Github
Didn't the new owners stop doing that?
Yes but, "come to S. Todd's pie shop - now under new management" isn't exactly a ringing endorsement/.
26124 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
Who cares. It literally takes 6 minutes to pull, change the remote, push to BitBucket and delete your Github account.
And how long to tell everybody else searching for your project that you are now on BitBucket and not just gone?
How many of your contributors are going to switch, or do they just abandon it?
How do you really delete all your existing data now that it is owned by MSFT?
Split it into Github and Github-for-Business but not allow you to use both at the same time
Github for Business only supported on Windows
Only allow Office365 subscribers to reset their passwords, or sometimes only outlook.com emails or occasionally only live.com - which depends on the phase of the moon.
Remove the code checkin/out feature but add new options to post photos to your project timeline
More a question of fitting satelite beacons puts up airline tickets by X% causing Y% more people to drive cause Z% more road accidents.
I think somebody worked out that wishing to avoid TSA "security" and a new fear of flying led to an increase in driving which would have killed more people than 9/11 if it continued for a decade.
The reduction in rail services following Hatfield (in the UK) probably killed more people than the incident.
They didn't even laugh at him for the heliocentric theory.
They laughed at him because he was funded by political faction X and faction Y managed to convince the pope that the book was a personal attack on the pope.
It was like Richard Dawkins writing a book about evolution where a wise black man tries to explain it to an orange haired idiot who thinks dinosaurs live in Canada - and then being surprised when it isn't on the White House christmas present list.
Although for political reasons part of the plan was to shut down the previous dept on mass just before the new system was rolled out - so that no long term employees would be carried forward.
Can any 5 year olds see a flaw in this plan ?
So what is the procedure for paying time in lieu to a federal employee of union A required to be on standby on a provincial holiday to supervise an employee of Union B completing a task at a site that qualifies for remote living allowance?
There are literally 1000s of these - miss one out and IBM will happily charge you $10,000 a day to document, specify and implement the fix.
is that no one really knows what the current system does
And the supplier knows this.
In spite of 6000 page specifications in this case - there will be things missed.
The suppliers bid to lose money on the original contract and then make the real profit on billing vast amounts for any inevitable changes. For extra bonuses you implement things in the original spec wrongly - but legally in keeping with the spec - and hope for big $$$$$ to fix it
Nobody is going to buy these add-ons, because Moto are never going to sell them.
Anybody who has ever done any consumer design knows that they are a non-starter on something like a flagship mobile.
Its purpose is to get Moto a cover story on Wired and some free advertising in the Gaurdian with a claim that it will reduce landfill
in the face of f*cked up exec 'leadership'
So I should bet my company on them to support the solution they sell me ?
Being a non-executive IBMer is probably one of the toughest places you can be right now.
And these are the people I will be relying on to be around and motivated in 10years to fix the critical system I'm considering buying
Although in this particular case the sensible position is to walk away from Galileo with a sigh of relief.
The use case is to retain access to the encrypted military channel in the circumstance in which the USA blocked access to GPS for it's UK NATO ally for the entire theatre of war (remember no selective availability - it's GPS or nothing) and yet the 27 Eu members would all have approved the UK's actions.
Bearing in mind that the USA has a kill switch for Galileo if it ever needed to block GPS from an area
Once it's adrift it's relatively easy to board and loot
You just need a way of offloading 20,000 TEU of containers into your Zodiac and landing them in Somalia or transferring 100K m^3 of natural gas in mid-ocean
Most piracy is to rob the crew + petty cash, or to take rich tourists hostage, nobody is robbing a bulk ore carrier for the cargo
For older ships that need lots of maintenance - no. But then again you aren't going to retrofit them with robots.
For modern mega containerships and tankers, they already have the crew at bare minimum and it's mostly to check on the cargo. They already have all the auto aids to reduce crew so no real saving in cutting 10 people.
The real win for robot ships is small boats doing routine tasks that need lots of crew crew to cover 24x7 shifts. Harbour tugs, survey boats, cable laying, crew transfer, crane barges - anything with short range and relatively low trip lengths.
Then there are tasks that you can't have a simple bouy because you can't anchor it, but a manned ship would need a large enough crew to have 3 watches + accomodation + food + water + power + lifeboats, making a simple Arduino app suddenly a 300ton vessel.
Anyone else feel this plays straight into Facebook / google's hands ?
Like big car companies demanding every stricter safety regs that only their newest cars meet.
Like everyone else I have got a bunch of emails from everyone I have dealt with asking for permission to keep contacting me. Like everyone else I ignored them.
But vital social media services I use everyday (ie el'reg) I am going to agree to their terms - so soon only those must-use-everyday services are going to have permission to contact me and so will control 100% of online advertising.
The are allowed to keep images of people who haven't been charged - if they declare them to be "a person of interest". So just decide that anyone requesting their images are removed is obviously a wrong-un and so "a person of interest" and they have a right to keep the image = simple
No they were totally made up by the 'discoverer' (either deliberate fraud or self-delusion) and everybody else saw them by the emperors-new-clothes effect. The experimental test was to surreptitiously steal the bit of kit that was steering them when the experimenter wasn't looking