>It is a shame he didn't bring the VMS/DCL command syntax with him.
Powershell is trying. DCL used to give you a grammar lesson in every error message.
26130 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
they'll just gift you the entire data set of the NHS without any checks, balances, or patient permissions.
And that is why it would work for the NHS.
If you want to detect cancers early from unrelated symptoms you need ALL the data from ALL the people in an unbiased sample.
You can't detect diabetes risk from poor diet if you take data only from US hospitals that charge $100 for an aspirin, or from genes in some racial group if that group opts-out because their data is going to be handed over to the police.
So grab the data. process it in the UK, by a university that isn't going to de-anonymise it and use it to fix car insurance premiums. And don't worry that a few Gaurdian columnists are going to whine about owning our own data
>Employers buying browsing history?
Over here, on the left pond, the employer pays for health insurance - it's fscking expensive.
If we were a bigger company and had an older workforce it might just pay me to check that a new hire hadn't been googling "high blood pressure" or "diabetes medicine" before I hired him.
Ironically I can't ask about health, marital status, kids etc in an interview but I can (probably IANAL) buy all his browsing history from his ISP following a few recent rulings.
Even if it were illegal for me to use that info in the USA - I could have my offshore "employee screening" subsidiary do it and then "advise" me on hiring each candidate.
But what about moles? Or the Edward Snowdens of the world?
They have access to the information anyway - they aren't stealing the supercomputer memory a bit at a time through cache-miss side channels.
My point is that the jobs running on these machines are restricted, controlled and billed!
Back in the Cray days, and even now on the biggest machines, you don't log in to your shell account ad start running stuff. The builds and verifications are typically done on front end servers and then submitted to some queue.
Worrying about Spectre on a top500 is like fitting a bike lock to the wheels of a moon buggy.
I assume this will apply to cloud.
I can buy cloud time with all the protections enabled - but I pay a 20% loss of speed
Or my company's tasks are guaranteed to be the only user on the physical CPU and a I pay a 10% security premium.
Or I could decide I don't care. The attacker can slowly try and extract sensitive information with cache miss tricks. But if I'm doing CFD or seismograph modelling, and the attacker would need to get hold of the entire Tb data set to make sense of it, and still wouldn't know where the data was coming from - do I care? Especially if I can conceal who I am when I'm renting the machine.
If you are worried about malware exploiting security flaws in your on-premise top500 supercomputer - aren't you perhaps missing a bigger problem ?
It's a few years since I worked on this sort of stuff, but we used to have men with guns stopping you even going into the building with all the Crays - we certainly weren't concerned with a user clicking on a dodgy website.
Buttons that look like buttons instead of having to discover that swiping three times widershins during a full moon is required to start some app.
Buttons that distinctly change to tell you they are selected, rather than a pale blue-grey changing to a pale grey-blue.
Borders you can actually click on rather than having to find the 1 pixel wide gap between ribbons that will move the window rather than expand some toolbar element to full screen
But Brexiteers taking advantage of the likely increased rush for properties there is a bit beyond the Pale.
Not at all. Once they see the UK's ascension to the glorious dawn of Eu-free prosperity, these former soviet republics will be clamoring to leave the Eu and join a new British commonwealth.
Mr Rees-Mogg et al are just the advanced guard, setting up cricket pitches etc
Sounds like an excuse to post this NASA Fakes Moon Landing! Photographic Proof!
Leaving aside if it is justified
Do these massive corporate fines ever actually get paid to the governments ?
And in the case of the Eu - who do they get paid to ?
Or (like Apple's in Eire) do they get appealed for decades, ignored, or 'disspeared' by some accounting trick - or paid but written off against tax ?
All the line of business office apps will go to the cloud.
All the collaboration stuff is going to be mobile
That leaves the desktop for content creation, video, photoshop, cad. People who don't care how much the HW costs as long as it is powerful and works. It's Apple's to lose
has rewarded companies that engage with tech-savvy professionals who bypass their fading IT departments, and introduce new technology products and services into their organisation
Say by introducing personal computers onto every desk so you didn't need the mainframe guys to do a spreadsheet ?