Re: What do all the staff at google actually do?
They have to be very quick to type the answers to all your search queries, and very clever to know those answers off the top of their heads
26124 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
>You cannot contact to break the law.
Yes but I suspect that if you called 911 to report a cig lighter in the shape of breasts - they wouldn't send a SWAT unit. *
The point of the arbitration is to stop every HR issue turning into a civil court case and the original reason for forced arbitration was to stop the richer person automatically winning out of court. You accuse a VP of abuse, you go to court, they demand that you put up a $$$$$ bond to cover the VP's legal costs if you lose - you poor secretary drop the case.
(* Actually in Ca they might, unless you made it quite clear that it wasn't being used for tobacco)
At the risk of being fair to the slithy gove
The 'experts' he had enough of were economists working for the world bank and friends who claimed that the financial crisis wasn't the banks fault, that the government always needed to bail banks out and austerity was a good idea to cut deficits.
A bit different from denying physics
At least in academia (alleged) positive discrimination has had two discriminatory effects.
There are a lot more women being hired for new junior roles by departments desperate to look good to funding bodies / reverse centuries of unfairness (delete as applicable). Senior roles of course go to other senior people where the candidates are almost all men.
The best male new PhD are still getting jobs at the most elite labs but a large cohort of "average"
women candidates are finding a lot less competition for jobs, especially at less prestigious institutes.
This is having two effects, the publication/citation score is diverging for male/female authors. To a first approximation new tenure track men are selected from top 10% while average new female tenure track are 'average'. There is also a bias (at least in physics) that men tend to go for the sexy/high-risk/Nobel worthy areas while women are more represented in more applied, likely to get useful results, but less press-worthy fields.
The other irony is that the average salary for male/female graduates, and more so for PhDs is becoming less equal. All the average male physicists (like me) are leaving academia after PhDs to get very highly paid jobs in industry/finance, while more women are getting relatively lowly paid post-docs/junior staff posts in academia.
Note: This is a my very UK/USA view. In most of Europe my branch of physics was traditionally the girly science option. Probably because in the C19 it involved sitting indoors doing tedious calculations by hand rather than doing dangerous laboratory stuff. The result is that depts in Italy/Spain are mostly female even at professor level.
A lot can be done by industry to change this concept though.
Yes it is annoying to anyone who understands statistics to be told that they must make their math/physics dept 50/50% by next year or they are little better than child abusers. But it isn't fair for industry to entirely wash their hands and say "no women applicants - not our fault"
Here in Canada the resource industry has done a LOT of work to encourage women in science and engineering from school onwards. So much that when you go to many mine sites the majority of students/interns and new graduates are women.
Even the blue-collar jobs are done by women. 300 tonne haul trucks have power steering, you don't need rippling arm muscles to drive them and I have been told by a few managers that they prefer hiring women - they are more likely to turn up on time and sober on monday morning than the average guy in the oil sands.
It is going to take another generation for 11 year old girls to filter through to PhDs, and for it to become cool for a teenage girl to want to be a programmer but everytime you get a chance to talk to a school group or if you have kids - bear it in mind. And stop worrying about all the SJWs who couldn't program arguing about sexist symantics.
Assuming Intel started out with the typical male/female ratio of a technical company to achieve this level of equality it can't have been hiring all the new positions with a completely blind process - otherwise it would have 0.9 * (1990 tech company ratio) + 0.1 * (typical 2018 silicon valley).
The only way it has suddenly got to (typical 2018 silicon valley) ratio is if almost all the hires for the last few years have been women only or if it has been removing the predominately male older expensive employees.
> if they book that revenue abroad and don't declare it to the Exchequer, that would be tax fraud
Why if they are a foreign company?
I buy email services from a US company, they book that income in the USA (or probably in Grand Cayman) I have that in my accounts as a payment to the US company. Where does the Inland Revenue get any of this ? Is the UK planing to tax any foreign company on sales from UK customers?
All Amazon have to do is close its AWS business in the UK, and have UK customers use USA hosted AWS zones and pay in $. It can still keep its UK shopping site - that makes no profit.
>..and the corporations will pass the cost of that tax straight on to us as higher prices. Thanks Phil.
No they won't. British Widgets Ltd will run the job on a cheaper foreign Amazon AWS zone (no GDPR for us now we are free of the ECJ jackboot), Amazon will book the AWS revenue abroad.
Or are we going to demand that British companies only use British suppliers for their internet stuff ?
To refuel something you have to stop next to it. Stopping takes the same amount of fuel as speeding up. So Tesla's rocket would need to carry another rocket the same size to de-accelerate to match Keppler.
But then you would need another half-dozen rockets bolted to the first rocket to lift the second rocket - that would be a big fsckign rocket.
The reason they make it in China is that the rest of the supply chain is local.
Corning make the gorilla glass next door, 90% of Siemens production of pick and place robots are in the city, the CNC machine shops for the case are local.
Apple could follow Foxconn to Wisconsin, but even if they sourced all the components in the USA they would have a complex supply chain of chips from Oregon, glass from NY, cases from Texas etc.
With all the raw materials and all the machine tools subject to tariffs, delays and politics
Components from China and raw materials from Canada for products assembled in the USA are taxed.
Products, like the iPhone, entirely manufactured in China are tariff-free
This is to encourage American companies to move factories to the USA ?
Not seeing the subtle econometrics of this is obviously why I'm not a billionaire business leader
When people have no income, they will find some way to keep themselves fed.
>You really believe that people turn to crime to eat?
I believe that global IT solution suppliers turn to crime to land government contracts that they have no intention/ability to deliver, just to keep the shareholders fed.
Same everywhere, cheap unwanted area attracts artists/startups. Area becomes cool and fashionable, more people move there, rents go up, people demand that the government do something to preserve etc etc
I'm a starving artist, the government must do something to allow me to buy a cheap loft in SOHO, Montmatre, Chelsea
So now instead they probably have an official screen locking policy which is enforced by requiring colleagues to report your unlocked screen to HR and the number of incidents being reported on your annual review, and having an entire army of enforcement and reporting staff.
And somehow this produced lower moral than having your homepage set to Rick Astley !
The Yes Minister: CGSM - consignment of geriatric shoemakers = a load of old cobblers.
Personally I prefer a note asking if contributor X came from a close family, specifically did his parents have the same name before marriage?
The new marketing plan suggests that the executive in question has a heritage rich in inter-species diversity.
He doth protest nowhere near enough
If this turns out to be:
A 3letter agency getting in the ground work for some future China tariff / ban
Intel putting in a defensive move to dilute any stories about its management engine
A short seller hoping to take advantage of a drop in share price.
It could be the end of Bloomberg. Why am I paying $25K/pa for a Bloomberg terminal that is about as trustworthy as Fox and friends ?
>Just move HQ and most of the business to EU and leave a small operation in UK
But then you have to hire entirely new staff, in a foreign country, that you don't know if you as a ceo/director will be able to work in come March.
Much cheaper and easier to get a brass plaque on the wall of an Irish lawyer and nothing else changes.
>As far as I'm concerned, a PAC is nothing more than a bribe aggregator.
Yes, I think that's rather the point.
Of course it would be much more efficient if you could just bribe the government directly through some official agency. Although that would probably make the bribes more expensive and less efficient
>All? Since when did 27 out of 180+ countries count as "all"?
Remind me how many countries the UK has an independent trade deal with as of April 2019 ?
We are still waiting to find out if our CE marking will be valid / what will replace it. But as a medical device manufacturer it is trivial to re-engineer all our testing / certification over a weekend at the end of march.
>prices fall due to new tariffs
I'm not sure that negative tariffs on imports are strictly speaking "tariffs". I think the word you are looking for is subsidies
>or strengthened sterling
If splitting off all your export markets causes your currency to strengthen then we could do more of it.
Build a wall around each county perhaps ?
>Can someone tell me the difference between a pornographic image on social media and one on a porn site
The government would look mad if they censor that photo of that girl in vietnam with naplam / without clothes, or ban pictures of starving naked babies in an African famine.
The government doesn't want to look mad (allegedly)
Therefore they need an exception
That creates a weird incentive that people who remain working for the company get diluted while anyone that leaves doesn't.
Not directly equivalent but was involved in a company where one co-founder died leaving his widow owning half the business. She wouldn't give up any shares to recruit a new technical co-founder and the company died. VCs now typically have a first-refusal/claw-back clause if a founder leaves early or dies.
Microsoft made the modern computer industry what it is.
Imagine only being able to learn about computers by being hired as the lowest of the low at some company that had a mainframe, and gradually working your way up. Then if you left that knowledge was worthless because the next company had a different mainframe (or enough tweaks to the same one)
The irony is everyone being able to switch between jobs using the same apps on the same containers running on the same Linux on different cloud service is because Microsoft standardised the PC OS
Don't know the details but it isn't a necessarily evil activity.
You have 4 staff, you lose one, you need to replace them to keep the business running,
You can't afford to pay the new hire enough to lure them away from HP/Ti/IBM so you offer stock. If the one you lose has 1/4 of the stock you don't have anything to offer the new hire.
It's why the incentive/vesting plans for founders are so complex now
Once we renationalise the post office and put it in charge of internet and telephones again it will be able to enforce the rules that only GPO approved 300baud modems can be connected. And with internet calls priced per minute you won't want your lightbulb calling up to the server very often