Re: RF control for trains.
It's also safer having a guy standing next to the coupling moving the train rather than one guy standing between the cars handling the coupling and a train driver a 1/2 mile away moving the train.
26130 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
This is the norm for all industrial crane control handsets. Some of the encryption might be a bit naive IF you were close enough to sniff the packets - which would generally mean on site.
The problem detailed in the report is that some of these remote handsets had external ports (for testing/updates etc) and people were connecting these to networked PCs to allow more remote control or easier updates - these extra links weren't secured.
No mining/off-shore stuff built to insanely high standards and costs a fortune.
But the standards were created decades agoand are for physical ruggedness, waterproofing, electrical safety, explosion proof, EMC emissions, reliability - not for being hacked by North Korean Cyber Ninjas.
It's hard to make some of these things fail "safe"
A lot of equipment gets damaged/causes risk if stopped suddenly so having a system slam on the emergency brakes because a controller loses line-of-site for a second while the operator scratches their nose - might not be the safest option.
But you also don't want to use 2-factor authentication and enter a 16 digit password for an emergency stop.
>Though you would hope that the controller itself would prevent some of the dangers as part of its functional safety management.
How would the controller know that moving the load N instead of E would put it through the window of the bosses car?
The cranes have load sensors and load/angle/extent limits but they don't generally have a map of allowed traverse space - in the way an industrial robot would. Imagine a building site where you had to redefine the safety envelope everytime a delivery arrived or a new wall was built
>spend it on genetics and bio-chemistry,
Using current tools - or have genetics and bio-chemistry employ the physicists to develop new tools ?
Would be tricky to do genetics and bio-chemistry without x-ray diffraction, NMR/IR spectroscopy or the other tools of blue skies particle physics research
Because the only thing more efficient than public servants is PPI deals with Capita.
Ideally you want to reduce the big bills first. There are going to be a lot of Angolan 'freedom fighters' unemployed now that their civil war has ended. Replacing the DoD with a bunch of Africans on $1/day will save $$$$Tn. And it mans that politicians no longer have to be worried about poor white kids are being killed in the next war.
>so that works out at 1 in every 160 full time employees in the US is furloughed. That is f%&king insane!
Presumably the perfect Republican argument for slimming government.
If 1 in 160 of US workers are non-critical government employees - doesn't that mean the USA is a communist country?
>With Let's Encrypt it the renewal process can be fully automated.
Not when the renewal process is, get qualified as an approved government bidder, respond to an RFP, certify that you pass all the ethical standards, make a contribution to the correct politician's campaign fund, promise a massive number of jobs in the right area.
Get the contract
Submit an invoice, be paid 180 days later unless there is a shutdown or some new politician gets elected
Or you just have a permanent shut down.
Agencies like TSA, DHS, the nuclear bit of DOE are rolled into the DoD and get funding.
Those workers in agencies you want to keep (IRS, SEC) are "paid" their regular salary in the form of 99year interest free loans every two weeks from the Army/Navy credit unions .
The fed credit unions are then "bailed out" - there is never any problem with paying banks.
Then all the agencies that certain Republicans have wanted to remove (FCC, consumer protection, FDA, DOE etc) will close when it becomes obvious to their staff that they are never going to get paid
If they were smarter politicians the democrats would support it.
But only so long as it would do what Trump promised and be impenetrable to middle eastern Mexican terrorists.
So they get a quote for a Berlin Wall++, with a 5mile deep minefield, dozens of electric fences, machine guns, anti-tank missiles etc etc until it is going to cost $squillion. Then demand that the senate produces a bill funding it from tax revenue.
Unless it's for national security, or covered by an existing "all customers all places at all times" warrant, or they are at the border (ie within 100mi of the coast, border or an international airport).
Of course if you break these laws you can expect a swift and decisive pardon
I was an unofficial BOFH for a startup that went bust.
The administrator's lawyers sent me a bunch of letters demanding that I make all the data available to them = I come into their offices and reassamble a bunch a servers in a store room, restore them and go through them for any IP that might be valuable. I asked if I was being paid and got back a bunch of more threatening letters about my legal duty to hand over any information.
Unfortunately I had wiped the ssh keys from my personal machine and they didn't know anything about boot disks.
> did Cook really believe the buyers of that model would have run to buy something costing almost thrice?
Apple doesn't care about you buying the phone so much as you buying apps/music/movies/etc on their infrastructure for decades. A cheap phone attracts poor people who don't spend as much online.
Isn't ICO/GDPR precisely the reason that they don't fix this?
If some random Gary emails and asks them to change a customer data and they do - won't the real customer rain down fines and brimestone upon them?
It's the sort of thing that means companies now require a letter from your lawyer signed by 3 popes before they will deal with you