Re: Redefinition of airliners
The real problem is flying on a plane you don't own
26124 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
> by the time the first one is launched, rolls of the production line, technically it is obsolete, yes?
Yes, but hopefully so is the opposition kit
Refitting with new tech is standard, it's a little easier with ships because you have lots of space and mass. Much easier to weld a new missile system to a frigate than add a 3rd gun deck to a jet fighter
Several of the US battleships in the Iraq Adventures were from WWII
Can't access from here but there is a great technical overview about it on youtube by a British engineer
The initial problem was a single line going out because of heat/weather. The issue was most of the grid was solar+wind with no inertia from turbines. The turbines that they did have were nuclear and auto disconnected from the grid 'for safety' and they didn't have any spare stabilization loads.
I learned there are entire un-powered power stations driven from the grid feeding power back to the grid just to provide rotational inertia and so frequency stability
Spain/Portugal also has very poor links to the rest of Europe for historical reasons (cough Franco)
Even before the rule of the Great Leader. The USA blocked the launch the Canadian Radarsat2 earth resources because it would allow those dangerously polite people to the North access to high quality surface data.
So it was launched from Russia (well presumably Kazakhstan by that point but still pretty non-US aligned)
>Americans for the most part don't care about tea.
Or about cricket, or apparently about many other activities which would be judged a mark of civilization. Perhaps tea would be a start ?
>We are a coffee culture
And yet "pumpkin spice" is a thing
>I do not know any Americans who think the hot tap is adequate for brewing tea.
I give you the abomination known as Starbucks