Re: Signature versus signature block
Then it's a forgery. Just the same as if the cleaning lady had taken a signed draft letter out of the paper recycling bin and mailed it.
26111 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
Sir Humphrey: Minister, Britain has had the same foreign policy objective for at least the last five hundred years: to create a disunited Europe. In that cause we have fought with the Dutch against the Spanish, with the Germans against the French, with the French and Italians against the Germans, and with the French against the Germans and Italians. Divide and rule, you see. Why should we change now, when it's worked so well?
Hacker: That's all ancient history, surely?
Sir Humphrey: Yes, and current policy. We had to break the whole thing [the EEC] up, so we had to get inside. We tried to break it up from the outside, but that wouldn't work. Now that we're inside we can make a complete pig's breakfast of the whole thing — set the Germans against the French, the French against the Italians, the Italians against the Dutch... The Foreign Office is terribly pleased; it's just like old times.
Ironically the supplier is probably losing money on the £10 battery as well.
It's a medical device so I have to have traceability with the manufacturer and supplier. They have to inform me of any change in the supply chain, I have to document that I have received those updates. I have to be able to prove that when I received, stocked, sold and delivered that particular battery I was upto date on all those change docs and document that, and store those documents.....
4 anyone who speaks any giddam foreign took language is probably. A goddam foreign gook who can't be trusted. Or if they are an american who learned foreign they are obviously a traitor.
This was actually the reason for the founding of a lot of AI research in the 59s. They needed to translate a lot of Russian, but anyone who knew Russian must be a communist.
Buran was worse, it was built by somebody copying the committee's homework on the bus.
It had no engines because the shuttle's engine are an amazing piece of engineering and the USSR couldn't build them. But it still was shaped to have engines and sat on the side of the booster where it would need to be if it had engines.
It took off in the wrong direction and had to do a stressfull aerodynamic roll to point toward orbit, because the shuttle did that. But the shuttle only did it because they were reusing an Apollo era launch platform that was built the other way around
It's main advantage was that it could be flown to orbit and back remotely, in which case why did you need pilots and so why did you have to design the craft to have pilots seats and windows at the front ?
So are a bunch of tattooed counter-culture anti-establishment anarcho-cyber-ninjas suddenly going to apply for salaried government jobs, breeze through security vetting and be welcomed into the cutting edge technology culture of airport mall cops ?
Or is this just going to result in big checks being written to a bunch of defense contractors to produce power points featuring a lot of black hoody stock photos and green scrolling CRT font text ?
> the king you're thinking of wasn't forced to abdicate because of Wallis Simpson being divorced. That was just the excuse
That's rather the point. the constitution is entirely public opinion = a function of the prime minister and the editor of the Daily Mail
>How is that a concern?
Because a future supreme court may extend their powers over parliament.
Governments have used lots of procedural tricks to avoid embarrassing debates - are all these going to involve a call to the judges?
Are judges going to rule on whether a speech in parliament is "economical with the truth"
>Are they Brits unaware of the constitional law of their country?
The constitutional law of the country is what parliament / the PM / the palace / the editor of the Daily Mail think they can get away with.
One king can get fired for marrying a divorcee, another royal divorcee can get canonised by the press.
One PM can send in troops to break strikes, win a war then get fired because of it.
Another PM can lie to start a war and be proclaimed as the greatest leader ever.
> In your, and presumably his, terms that's an outstandingly bad case to make to the people
But when "making cases to the people" that doesn't really matter.
Unellected establishment judges overuling the democratic will of the people / there are weapons of mass destruction / china will pay the tarrifs = all make good politcal slogans
>One of my pet peeves is the use of GDP per capita as a rough proxy of how wealthy / advanced a country is
There are a million people in Chicago.
The Chicago derivatives exchange does > $1 Tn in trades
- therefore everyone living in Chicago is a millionaire.
> Why haven't supermarkets and hospital trusts got the message even just this month?
So the supermarkets were supposed to build millions of sq ft of new warehouse space - the buildings to house half a years supply of imports are standing around empty - somehow fill them with 6 months supplies of fresh fruit and veg from europe, all ready for the 1st april 2019.
All to be paid for out of the 350M/wk presumably ?