Re: AI and satellite controlled gun
Also worth noting that this is hardly a unbiased report.
26124 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
>On what planet does this make a match? Get out of my office before I have you arrested for being a fucking idiot."
You show it a police training set where 90% of the targets are black and let it loose in a population where 10% of the population it sees are black, it is going to choose the wrong targets. It isn't the software's fault.
It was to make it 'backward compatible' with other lower security services that only had 3 wheel systems.
Generally this is a 'good thing', sending exactly the same message, eg a weather forecast, in easy code for fishing boats and ultra top super security mode for u-boats is a 'bad thing'
>"Telephone".
>Not at sea or in the air.'
You don't generally send encrypted messages to the air.
Dear spitfire pilot in the battle of Britain, switch to autopilot and get out your typex machine to decode this message telling you where the German fighters are
Similarly you don't transmit a powerful radio signal from London telling your convoys where to sail to tomorrow in the same way that a U-boat HQ has to
>what methods did the British have to hide their communication from the Germans during the war
Telephone, Britain had less need to use radio for most comms.
Less centralized, so wider variety of codes rather than everything being enigma while ironically a more concentrated and centralized analysis effort compared to political separate organizations on the other sode
Fortunately this is only an old (almost) obsolete telescope not a bridge, highway or dam or other vital infrastructure
>strawman - do those competitors have a structure with an aggressionist governmental in control?
That was the argument for trusting Crypto-AG. They're Swiss, if you can't trust the Swiss who can you trust? - In this case the CIA
If you actually cared about security you would buy from china and then test the hell out of it, rather than assume something is perfectly safe because you bought it from scandanvians
They don't need to - it's all decrypted once it's on the bits of wet string connecting towers to the rest of the telephone system, which is owned by suitably 'patriotic' companies that are happy to hand over all the data without a warrant in return for a free pardon
Which was itself a kludge to get it low enough to the ground to allow it to carry its own airstairs onboard so it could operate from airports that didn't have the infrastructure to handle jets.
So we have bodged software to allow efficient engines on an airframe designed to be able to fly between JFK and LAX if neither of those airports were setup for jets and if the 737 still had onboard stairs.
Parachutes don't give you a soft enough landing (at least on land) to reuse the rocket.
So either land on water and hope to clean it out before it rusts, or a very-very big net, or try and catch it by helicopter.
SpaceX reckoned that the extra % of fuel it needs to hold back for the landing weighed less than the parachute, was more reliable and meant they didn't have to give it a sponge bath
Attempt to open spreadsheet in teams app - most features don't work
Right Click to 'open document in browser; - different subset of features work
Now have a right click to 'open document in sharepoint' - get a few more features
Finally 'open in app' starts excel so you can actually do stuff.