Re: The main problem with trying to spot antifa members...
> "antifa" is not an actual identifiable thing
Yes it is: if (skin_tone_pixel < 128)
26111 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
>The US could start by performing a dickectomy on itself and cutting away Florida.
Or just draw a line across the country and remove all those south of it.
Do you think they could be persuaded to come together into some sort of confederation and succeed ?
Except while they passed almost no laws during the last 4 years (except a massive tax cut) they did install a bunch of mental patients (*) who will have final say in laws are valid for the next 40 years.
* - if I said that a voice in my head, filtered through the folk stories of a bunch of bronze age sheep molesters, told me what to think - you would put me away.
"ARM needs to remain under UK control,"
It isn't - it's owned by a Japanese hedge fund managing a Saudi sovereign wealth fund.
I suppose the UK govt could spend 40Bn buying it back in order to stop any foreigners using it - not like they having any other pressing matters to deal with
Yes, almost like you should bet on new innovative startups doing new and innovative stuff rather than backing monopolies for nationalistic reasons.
If Dr Hauser had said - The govt should support some group of smart people somewhere doing something new and innovative with eg RISC_V - I would have a lot more respect.
I only just found out that they invented the non-brand "white label" own brand concept - although in their case yellow.
Or a strong position in New York remaining a financial center.
If a president can ban foreign companies on a whim shouldn't all foreign companies worry?
Trump also started a trade war with Canada, for National Security reasons, perhaps Bombardier could be the next victim, or Deutsche Bank if Merkle was rude to him or Samsung if he felt Korea wasn't supportive enough.
Then Saudi Aramco or gun companies could get worried about the next president.
Pretty soon it's safer to list in Singapore or Geneva or some new online exchange in some tax haven.
But forking a now obsolete old branch just to support existing non-commercial users doesn't sound like the sort of exciting new project which will attract may contributors.
It would make more sense to fork 6.0 and say *BEEP* to the Qt company and go on your own - especially since they have shown that they aren't planning to play nicely in future.
>You can't have an effective democracy when a sizeable minority of citizens are unwilling to believe that their side lost an election
You could just tell them that their side DID win.
Since there is generally very little difference in US policy between the center-right and the further-right parties. You could just segment the audience so that all Fox viewers get told that R won and all the Wapo readers get told the D won, Facebook are already essentially there.
It would make everyone happier and remove the need for expensive and disruptive elections.
Then the the country could continue being run by <NO CARRIER ..........
>It wasn't Intel's fault: ECC memory is just too expensive for most people's cost/benefit equations."
Intel kept ECC for the server market to charge a premium for Xeons
If you had ECC on all CPUs then cheap RAM would become available with ECC and everyone would just buy desktop machines instead
Remember you have to buy Xeon (or preferably Itanium) for 'real' work