Re: the above quote isn't really saying a lot
Only a finite number of customers, less than INT_MAX, have been affected
26130 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
>Pretty sure that at the temperature of re-entry, any dioxin produced won't last very long.
Temperature is only high for the front of solid heavy objects hitting serious ram pressure heating.
The inside of meteorites arrive at the surface still deeply frozen.
Gases leaking out of heated batteries and then dispersing into the ultra-rarifed upper atmosphere aren't likely to be affected much. Then worry that chemistry of the upper atmosphere is complicated with very small amounts of some vital molecules spread very thinly.
Remember it didn't take very much mass of CFCs to destroy a layer of Ozone. You can't just say 'the entire mass of the atmosphere is massive so a few 100kg of X can't do any harm" - and then disperse that X into a very thin layer of upper atmosphere.
>Not sure Leeds would be daft enough to bid for the money pit that is the Olympics though
But if wer run in Yorksha it mek a profit.
No fancy stadium, just run to the other end of the carpark, cross-country is the wasteground next to school
Marathon would be around the ring road, not closed to traffic to give you a bit of a boost
Rowing in the Canal
And this allows you to won art that can't be put on an easel.
You own a painting or sculpture only if you have the physical item, this lets you own a totally digital artwork or 3d render, or computer generated animation.
Without this how would you 'own' a digital sculpture ?
He made the mistake of only ripping off investors for a few $100K, if he had ripped of the govt for a few $Bn he would have got a follow up contract..
The odd thing is why he decided to steal the money, all he had to do was hire a couple of incompetent offshore programmers to fail to build a website, while paying himself and family members a large salary as consultants and claiming a few foreign trips as expenses. Then the company goes bust = all perfectly legal
> All of these little horrors should only be allowed on an air-gapped network, and have no direct access to the internet.
Exactly, if I want to see who is at my house while I'm at work I call my in-house security team (who operate from a secret bunker below my fish pond), they connect to the air gapped camera, copy the footage onto 16mm film and after developing it drive it and a projector around to my office.
>They can supply internet just as easily to a city centre as the middle of nowhere.
But not as cheaply as competitors running fibre from an exchange on the corner.
They are also limited in bandwidth / area. A lot of users seeing the same group of satellites lowers the bandwidth, although a city center would also have nearby uplink so there is less satellite-satellite relay
I remember that the government spent a lot more effort on defending against "domestic threats" than the Russians
If the government had put as much effort into the CCCP as it did into spying on CND, Greenpeace, the NUM, TUC etc. Although it probably didn't help that at the time all the security services were headed by Russian assets
Of course things are completely different now.
1, Announce a US Cyber-force
2-49, Decide on name for 'soldiers' (discover Guardians of the Galaxy already taken by Space force, reject Ninja as cultural-appropriation) and uniform design
50-99, Political in-fighting about which agency gets to own/staff/control/get-the-budget-for
100-