Re: It can't...
Fortunately the Pentagon only has to go up against USSR Russia, N. Korea and Venezuela.
It did try going up against more lean startup-style entrepreneurial enemies in Afghanistan, it didn't go well.
26130 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
>Once upon a time robots.txt was there to stop scraping but that seems to have worked on the principle of a gentleman's agreement
It was to tell the search engine that this was dynamically generated data that wouldn't be available in future and so shouldn't be indexed.
It wasn't to tell the search engine that it should index it for search, but anybody coming to the site for the result should pay - you have to be some sort of sexchange expert to expect that.
I wondered about that. Last time I was involved in semiconductors we were getting custom stuff made for cheap on obsolete 3" wafer lines.
My understanding is that simple micro-controllers made on 60-100nm designs use what were cutting edge fabs a decade ago. Nobody is going to build a new 100nm fab because the margins on these parts is 1% of bugger-all so it would never pay.
Now in another 10 years there will be lots of 'obsolete' 5-7nm fabs around, but you aren't going to be making power switches on 5nm gates. And even if you just scaled up the design, the costs of a 5nm EUV process, even with the plant paid off, is unsustainable.
So are we going to need to start building lower end fabs? Or are we going to rely on a new round of 3rd world countries, after India and China catch up to TSMC? In 10 years are we going to be moaning about a car shortage because of a fab shutdown in Somalia?
It's the same with shares, every month I supposedly bought an ownership stake in America's 500 biggest companies. But when I went to the supermarket and asked them for my bit of Kraft-Heinz they looked at me like I was mad.
I'm beginning to think this joint stock company stuff is all a big scam.
I think I'll stick to investing directly in ventures, some chap has a scheme for extracting sunlight from cucumbers - but the details are all a bit hush-hush at the moment
>You forgot that Pump and Dump schemes are illegal.
>The US SEC would love nothing more than to take Elon down a peg or three.
Only if you are dumb enough to send an email to your accountant saying this is a scheme (which many people have)
Ideal case would be the SEC blocking him, then he can sell his shares walk away with a profit and say "I genuinely tried but the guberment stopped me!" The SEC can hardly sue him for selling after they told him he couldn't buy
>It's touching that you think the dead tree press has that sort of influence any more.
With young hip el'reg reading IT professionals = no
With people that write to their congressperson = yes
>That approach didn't work for Bezos. He bought the Washington Post and there's plenty of critcism of that vile gazillionaire.
Although it's stance on unions seems to have shifted recently
>The lender knows that you should be good for it, as you have that worth in stock.
If the bank is convinced the stock has long term value they will take the stock as collateral.
You never pay back the loan and the bank takes the stocks when you die.
Effectively you get tax-free money for life in return for considering the bank in your will
Possibly more inventory in the chromebook supply chain.
If you are making cutting edge laptops with the latest screens, GPUs and processors you don't have a lot of stock on hand because production is ramping up and the models change rapidly.
If you are making bog standard chromebooks by the million you are likely to have longer stable production runs of parts and so much bigger parts stocks.