Re: Superspreader? Give me a break.
>Do the Canadians have seatbelt laws?
Yes, but as long as you remember to shout "I'm a sovereign citizen, I don't accept Newton's laws" as you get into a crash - they don't apply to you
26111 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
Forgive my ignorance but isn't checking for primeness the ultimate parallel task?
If you have a naive algorithm of 'divide n by every integer upto sqrt(n)' then you can parallelise this with up to sqrt(n) processors !
That's a relatively soft problem, it's easy to replicate a repository.
The problem is if US corporations are scared off using/ contributing to a particular project.
I'm guessing that major projects are a big enough part of $$$ that the politicians aren't going to suddenly try and ban them.
>A retired British businessman who admitted selling weapon parts to Iran has been sentenced to 33 months in prison by a court in the US.
So if a contributor to GNU SDR included "not for military use" and the US Coastguard used it - he could have the British courts extradite the US president as CinC to rule on whether the Coastguard counted as military ?
See that's the great flexibility of a software licence.
Contributor 1: this software is not for use in Saudi
Contributor 2: this software is not for use in Israel
Customer: my government bans any boycott of Israel so is it illegal for me to use this software or is it illegal for me not to ?
I thought Tenerife was the textbook for why rigid rules are bad = we have to take off in the next 15 minutes or we will be out of hours and stranded 10,000km from home without a replacement crew - so there is a push to believe you heard the takeoff clearance.
Yes working hours affect safety but there are some ridiculous rules, you spent 24+ hours travelling constantly to get form your home to your home base, that doesn't count as working hours. You sit in the cockpit with the engines off at the stand doing paperwork, does that count? You sit in the de-icing queue for 2 hours with the engines off, does that count?
So it's fine for your crew to have spent 24hours commuting to get to this flight. But if they go over flight hours while sitting on the plane waiting 2hours for deicing you all have to go back to the gate, unload and wait for another 'fresh' crew to spend 24 hours battling through snow storms to get there.
I wonder if there is some scope for emergency rules in bad weather, if they can be written so they don't become the normal working conditions
Asked them to produce an essay on a current hyper-local topic with no existing corpus.
Now ask it to write an essay about gender roles in Shakespeare, or any of the other standard "deep" thought. English lit students are supposed to come up with.
If it regurgitates a mixup of every previous paper on the topic - isn't that the defn of literary criticism?
50:50 CS:RE does teach you that C++ templates surpasseth all human understanding
I assume it was 2 separate 1/2 credit courses but I like to think it was a single combined lesson.
We will now read from the holy book. K&R chap10 vs 2: "and lo the pointer returneth from malloc was not null and he saw that it was good "
You still have the encrypted passwd database on the key.
If you lose the key you only have to worry that it somehow finds its way into the hands of a master cybercrimal
An online passwd db company with millions of people's passwd is a bit more of a target.
I did computer O level soon after it was introduced (yes my chiseled abs hide how old I am)
It wasn't quite "colour in the picture of the minicomputer" but it was bloody close. I remember those of us who programmed in asm for fun finished in 30min and looked around confused.
But at least the USA is open and honest about using secret national security laws to compel companies to spy for them.
Those duplicitous foreigners claim that their government owned companies don't work for the government.
Meanwhile we are safe in the knowledge that our government is so crap at technology it couldn't spy on anyone. (Or at least that's what the MMB want you to think)
It's a problem operating piston engines in Northern Canada - they run on high-octane (often leaded) petrol which is hard to get, so you have to fly in fuel supplies to supply your cargo aircraft - which ends up being a bit self defeating.
Turbo-props run on kerosene, or even diesel in a pinch, so fuel is much more available
>How do they keep WWII planes flying then (legally)?
Grandfathered-in regulations and a lot of precision loophole navigation.
There are a couple of companies that will build you a Spitfire from scratch using modern components, all you need is the VIN plate from a crashed plane so that this is a "restoration" and no modern airworthiness rules apply
A previous government started to build a dam, which was too expensive for the next government to cancel - so we're building it even though they both agree there is no market for the power.
Of course there is no point in building a data center in Canada - until we get broadband
> it's every day pension funds, mortgages and savings
Almost certainly not. Ordinary Americans had to jump through a lot of hoops to 'invest' in this - it was probably easier to buy drugs online
Some VCs put some money in, but VC's job is to lose money so nobody cares
The good news for regular punters is that it was mostly rich or idiot's money, the bad news for the defendants is that it was mostly rich+idiot's money.