Re: Has anyone ever wondered
>and I could eat garlic…
Remember when there were tomatoes in supermarkets?
26111 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
We must have transitioned from MFM to ESDI at some point, there were definitely separate data / control cables but we had 330Mb cos we had to run Kodak (!) Unix on the 386, installed from boxes of 5.25 floppies
I remember in the mid 90s when external 1 Gb SCSI disks dropped to £1000, we got one for each Sun so that we would never have to worry about disk space ever again.
ps I'm not sure that Moore's law didn't actually stop at around 14nm designs for the original purely financial defn
Features have got smaller, and that's necessary for speed/size/power consumption, but I don't know if a 3nm fabbed device is cheaper/transistor than at 5nm
No it was an observation that the process cost of each wafer was proportional to the wafer area but the cost of going to smaller features was a one-off cost of a mask stepper (at least until we got into insanity-optics of EUV) and making a gate 30% smaller lets you fit twice as many parts in the same area.
"Chair" is ablist unless you also specifically include wheelchairs
I think "facilitating coordinator" or "coordinating facilitator" but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting by a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs, but by a two-thirds majority in the case of purely external affairs.
ps the "man" part in chairman is actually "main", French for hand and nothing to do with bloke-ness i.e. from the hand of the chair - cos the nobs were French when committees were invented
All our optical engineers are mainland Chinese
You know how schools cut back on STEM cos specialist teachers and labs were expensive ?
And the universities cut back on physics and chemistry cos specialist teachers and labs were expensive ?
And top physics dept stopped teaching classical optics in the 70/80s cos it was old and boring ?
And the few top optics research depts shut because all the students wanted to do cooler/better funded topics ?
Well this was also true everywhere outside china
Sounds way cooler than sending "voting advisers" and has the advantage that you can send them to countries that don't have votes.
Not sure about using article 5 against cyber attacks, I seem to remember Germany's leader was cyber attacked by a foreign superpower and their Eu trade negotiators were hacked by a foreign no-longer-super foreign power.
>(54 byte packets, anybody?)
53 bytes (well 48byte packet and 5 byte header) cos even numbers are for squares.
It's perfectly sensible, the datacoms guys wanted larger 64byte for high speed efficiency and the telecoms guys wanted smaller 32byte for better latency - so they decided on a perfectly reasonable compromise of 48bytes. then they added a separate header so you wouldn't have to bother reading the packet to find out what to do with it. then the committee went for a series of long lunches
There will be exemptions for cars. There are a lot more Eu car makers than Eu phone makers.
In fact we should probably look at tightened repair requirements for cars, for public safety. Probably a requirement to have all repairs done at a dealer and ban 3rd party aftermarket accessories.
So back when I wor a lad, and computers were fun, the advice was to do physics/maths/engineering not CS cos you could pick up that programming stuff yourself anyway
Then there was dot-com boom and everyone did CS cos it was an automatic job.
Then everyone had a CS degree so we only hired physics/maths/engineering people cos they hadn't just done CS for a job
Then nobody did CS cos you couldn't get a job
Now everyone does english/PPE/classics and a bootcamp - and we still only hire physics/maths/engineering who've learned programming stuff themselves.
Ladies/Gentlemen/AIs - that's the history of CS degree job prospects since the 80s
>Likewise at Google and Microsoft, when times are good they probably employ a whole bunch of people who don't actually produce very much.
Not necessarily a fault.
You might employ a Linus, or Bjarne or Guido even if they don't check in any code - to attract other star employees.
You might hire people because you are planning on moving into a new area and are "building a bench" or you might be snapping up all the experts in a field to stop a competitor.
Microsoft research is widely believed to be a way of keeping down a lot of possible disruptive startup ideas. Famously "if only we had managed to hire a couple of Stamford grad students and paid them to research page ranking algorithms - without them doing anything"
Also "useless waste of space" and "bullshit jobs" are synonymous. You can have morons working in vital departments and geniuses working as patent clerks