Re: Danger of Sabotage
So the USSR had secretly hacked Microsoft to create PowerPoint so that maintenance was now in the hands of managers who produced slides saying that it wasn't a priority - now that's long term planning
26130 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
>Keeping several backup copies of your data is easy.
But having a spare mirror system to restore them to isn't. Especially in a corporate environment, especially when you want to back-up router and firewall configs and domain controllers and other stuff.
Running verify to re-read the tape is easy, practising a bare metal restore and recover - isn't
So there are a bunch of states busily producing an abundance of low-skilled, un-educated people with low life-expectancy, just as we are going to need more low-skilled care workers for the ageing elite?
We've created morlochs but persuaded them to eat McDonald's instead - sounds like a brilliant plan
Yes for "average" life-expectancy. What these studies are showing is that we are going from there being a handful of people who are newsworthy for reaching 100, to having to deal with 50% of the population living passed 100 - while at the same time having the number of young people declining
>As nations develop, lifting the vast majority of their people out of poverty, you see the life expectancy grow massively. Up until you hit what was previously considered the plateau.
Fortunately now they will go past the plateau and hit the diet-and-exercise decline in less than a generation.
People whose parents grew up in famine will now die prematurely of western lifestyle diseases
>But you should then probably be aware that Alzheimer's doesnt hit in a day. It's a pretty steady downward spiral,
That's why we don't have re-licensing requirements for old people driving.
You don't notice the steady decline, but one day you are driving your F150 the wrong way down the freeway and nature takes it's natural course.
>So the neoliberal paradises of the USA & UK have static or falling life expectancy whilst in the socialist paradises of Western Europe (ex UK) it continues to rise. I wonder why that is?
You have to be a little careful about statistics. My city has about the highest life expectancy on the continent - it also has the highest S.E. Asian population, moving here from NY doesn't suddenly make you live to 100, unless you also become a Japanese grandmother.
And overall life expectancy is heavily weighted by childhood mortality, rules on how a still birth is counted, or at what date a miscarriage counts as a still birth have a big effect, It's going to interesting if certain states start counting all miscarriages as deaths with an age of -0.75
But mostly diet and lifestyle, although remember it's what diet and lifestyle was when those old people were young. Today's fat teenagers don't affect today's life expectancy. A lot of the reason for the USA/UK's health being crap is that they were crap 30-40 years ago, when a lot of Europe was less crap. Don't expect today's French / Italian teenagers to have the same diet/lifestyle as their grandparents.
How old and out of touch does the board have to be - to think that Branson is a draw for the yoof?
Somewhere in the boardroom of UK-MEGACORP the dust is blown off Sir Archibald Double-Barrelled and somebody suggests that they sign up that young Mr Cliff Richards because the young people seem to like that 'bebop' music
Really, the only purpose of a commercial air launched system today is that you can move it around to collect regional development grants.
I don't have a lot of sympathy for VO, it will probably pop-up tomorrow in Wales as part of Spaceport-Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch if sufficient "leveling-up" grants appear
Pretty much everyone with a successful launch industry is based on having an ICBM program. The military stuff subsidises the civil stuff - almost every launcher is just an ICBM and a bit of cut-and-shunt welding
Contrary view: if they had kept the black Arrow the UK government would have had to plough money into an insanely expensive alternative to Polaris/Trident and/or ground based ICBM. They would have had a limited space launch capability that lagged the USA but UK firms would be forced to use it, so strangling the UK's far more profitable and advanced satellite building industry.
Remember building the big firework , until the new startup ventures, is the low skill/low value/low profit part of the business
Take all the income from these fines and pay MSFT to make a government version of Outlook with no CC (or alternately use a open source email client that you can modify for free - but that's just ridiculous).
There is no use for a CC - especially with depts dealing with classified / sensitive material.
Boeing won't be allowed to fail.
The USA is not going to hand the airliner market over to cheese-eating-surrender aircraft. No US airliner is even going to operate C-E-S aircraft unless they accidentally took over a Euro carrier that got forced out of the market.
They will continue to get money from 'black' project everytime things look tough, and will continue to get 'support' from the regulators. the FAA aren't going to criticise Boeing that would be unpatriotic and probably communism.
But that is still self-certified.
People have the idea that the regulator should know more about the design and is going over it correcting your homework as it were.
Self-certified is really the only way to make an aircraft or medical device or etc. You come up with a list if things that could go wrong and you list how you mitigate the risk and how you will test the solution.
Sometimes the regulator has lists of risks you must consider. But ultimately they have to trust that the manufacturer did what they said they would. That's what the 737max didn't
There used to be a system involving bicycles and the fleet-of-foot to get very short lived isotopes from the accelerator to the hospital's dept of doing-scary-stuff-to-people.
Apparently they upgraded to a pneumatic tube running under the campus.
I love the idea that we have a nuclear air-rifle / pea-shooter
>Is there that much suspicious radioactive material being sent by snail mail these days ?
You can use Royal Mail but note that Pu-239 has a half-life of 24K years, which you should take into account when using 2nd class mail
Also under the Royal Mail Prohibited and Restricted Materials page they do note:
- UK & International - Allowed with restrictions
- Surround with cushioning material e.g. bubble wrap.
- The sender's name and return address must be clearly visible on the outer packaging.
"Suffice to say, it's generally illegal for any individual or group to own a nuclear weapon..."
If you're in the UK it's now illegal to use one - Nuclear Explosions (Prohibition and Inspections) Act 1998
Although fortunately: (2)Nothing in subsection (1) shall apply to a nuclear weapon explosion carried out in the course of an armed conflict.
>If we know each others' phone number and we know each other, we can call each other.
Yes but that's not the technical problem the ruling is trying to solve.
How to do this securely so that you and the person you are calling have total end-end encryption but the Luxemburg Coastguard can intercept the call if they have a warrant, but that GCHQ can't have access, unless the Eu allows it.
Building a domain specific language to enforce 3rd party access rights into the protocol is an 'interesting' software engineering challenge