Re: Old Confused Person Here
Because you can then arrest anyone for using encryption.
If child abusers use encryption then anybody using encryption is a child abuser, and you don't support child abusers do you ?
26111 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
they'll be selling the heat, won't they ? So, there's profit to be made
1, install, operate and maintain all the plant to concentrate the heat
2, run distribution network to nearest town cos zoning didn't let you build your massive DC in the middle of the village
3, install, operate and maintain all the heating in the houses
4, generate the list waste heat when the weather is hot and nobody wants their central heating on
5, profit
Swappable battery packs aren't necessarily a problem designed in from scratch. We manage it with industrial vehicles.
But for short <30 min flights with a similar turn around time - like shuttles - a DC fast charger would work.
A lot of an electrical aircraft is simpler than a car. There us no regen charging. The load is a lot more constant, especially if it had supercaps for take off.
The lack of swappable batteries in cars is purely economics/infrastructure
>yes, but you land, spend a few minutes pumping kerosene in to the tanks, then take off again
Then spend hours servicing the engines
Battery power isn't going to replace plant-goop for 737s but it could enable a lot of quadcopter airport-city centre taxi services with short ranges and strict noise / pollution limits
Huawei is a risk because of it's terrible programming quality which leads to lots of security loopholes while simultaneously having sophisticated Chinese backdoors which are undetectable to anybody who has analysed the code
Cisco is perfectly safe because it's security loopholes are all the users fault
And ASML spend 10 years and umpty billion euro developing the next magical machine - and it launches into one of those periodic semiconductor gluts
But they still have to spend 2*umpty billion on the next generation that is going to take another 10 years
It's a surprisingly tough market.
>companies to donate their used kit to schools,
Teachers. Instead of just rebooting a chromebook or handing a student a loaner machine out of the cupboard you are now administering a room of 30 Windows PCs.
But to make it more fun and challenging all these machines are donations so the whole classroom isn't the same model and they are also different from all the other classrooms
But the sense of achievement you get from debugging BIOS issues when a Dell model XYZ loses a backup battery or a Lenovo ZXY only puts boot message son the CPU HDMI port is why you got into teaching in the first place.
Unless this is all a brilliant education dept initiative to train an army of BOFHs who have already learned to hate all users by working with children for years
>But shutting down the idea of a) making motorways more dangerous and b) expanding our addiction to CO₂ gets my approval
You misunderstand. the hard-shoulder is still going to be used, they are just removing the "smart" bit.
If you aren't driving a BMW MRAP and somebody hits you - it's your fault for being a poor
>Or, maybe after 30 years, and a new generation of computer users has grown up, they expect different behavior
The younglings at our place would use their phone to take a picture of the screen.
Actually it's a useful habit, instead of writing down some long configuration command, or try and work out how to share a file snippet between two systems - just take out your phone and snap a picture
>You could have some special app you can't afford to port
Or you can't risk porting or it's not worth it for a single project
There are a couple of astronomy satellites whose data collection / analysis was running on VMS in the 2010s, and IIRC the Eurofighter avionics development was on VMS so hopefully somebody has a build system
VMS and VMS++ ie WNT, are better designed than Unix
They were actually designed over decades rather than a quick hack that got out of hand
However Unix was available - Carbon Fibre and Titanium are way better building materials than 2x4s but if you need to build a shed which are you using?
>Governments don't want just anyone writing code.
Governments don't care
Politicians do what special interests tell them to do / what special interests tell the media that the voters want them to do (depending on how advanced your democracy is)
Who is funding politicians to stop opensource ?
>but if you gave genuine advice that someone else didn't follow exactly and that caused a crash then surely you aren't.
Over here in lawyer land it's more complicated if you're a 'professional'
If I was an engineer rather than a mere physicist and I gave some advice, even if I wasn't being paid, I could be liable.
I would be liable even if I saw something and DIDN'T give advice, eg. I walked past a dangerous construction site.
Fortunately software (mostly) isn't counted as engineering - but if that changed then anyone with a software engineering degree could be liable for 'negligence' for open source contributions
>but it often doesn't matter in terms of legal liability whether someone gets paid or not for what they are doing.
Except the publisher of the software isn't responsible for what is done with it.
If i answer a question on reddit about car maintenance am I responsible for the crash ?
>If I bake some cakes and give them away on the street for free and people get sick because I didn't follow hygiene laws then I would be prosecuted.
>Why should software be treated differently?
Because software is more like "I publish a recipe for cakes, that doesn't mention to wash the ingredients" should I get prosecuted?
> especially if the airframe can be DIY’d from locally sourced cardboard and the electronics can be readily reused.
But I suspect this can be solved by requiring aerospace grade cardboard from an approved aerospace qualified supplier and assembled by a certified aerospace cardboard folding engineer - we'll soon have it upto a price that doesn't challenge any existing market players