Re: Expose
Did they have to be born in Manchester again? It seems a shame to be saved and yet still a Lancastrian
26130 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
>Does that mean there was something "wrong" with the old ones?
God changes his(her) mind quite often
When the implementation was in stone tablets it was a real pain to do in-field updates. You had to send a bunch of crusading knights.
With software updates you can just roll out a quick patch to fix that whole "no-bacon+penis-snipping" bug
>Nixon (defined by the icon) thought he was was only setting up an environment where black voters enjoying a puff of grass could be jailed to reduce people Nixon saw as voting against him.
That's not entirely true. He also wanted to attack white anti-establishment hippies and support central American dictators in their war against the communists cartels.
Getting rednecks in poor states to die from Oxycontin because "only hippies and N**** take drugs. I'm neither so what I take aren't drugs" was a bonus saving on welfare.
Hope they remember to amend their "S-1" to include the statement, "we just started an intimidation suit against somebody for claiming that ARM has security flaws, which could open us upto a regulatory bitch slapping. And we are currently praying that Maria Markstedter isn't an Eu citizen"
I hope they will stop all advertising showing cars driving faster than the speed limit in any Eu country and not driving in an unsafe manner. They will also have to restrict access to Lamborghini Countach and Porsche 911 posters to the age appropriate.
"detect, address and mitigate systemic risks, such as disinformation."
Does this apply to bus builders ?
>Boeing have already demonstrated their inability to build an SST, so thats OK.
Interesting conundrum.
We could give the money to CMOT Dibbler Aviation, but since he has no record of failing to build an SST - it's just possible that he will successfully build one.
So we have to give the handout to Boeing because they are the only ones with a proven ability to not produce a passenger plane.
>No, actually it's passengers who are too cheap to allow airports to run security efficiently.
The airports need you to spend 3hours waiting and shopping. It's what airports make all their money on - the aeroplanes are an expensive annoyance.
There have been a few attempts at business-class only UK-USA flights with no luggage, own security line, turn up 15minutes before and walk straight on - but the airports blocked them.
Perhaps the confusion is that the SR71 took off with almost empty fuel load. It's a very heavy aircraft with the low speed aerodynamics of a brick so had a very high take-off speed. In case of an 'oops' you want the minimum fuel load and mass.
That means you then start flying with tanks full of highly flammable fuel vapour (not good). It had a N2 purge system but with limited capacity, so you want to get the tanks full of nice cold JP7 as soon as possible. This is fine since you are probably going to be doing multiple refuelling to get to the picnic spot to take the photos.
Yes everyone knows it was Anglo-French. But the problem from the American point of view was that the French one went to France, the problem from the French point of view was that no Americans wanted to go to France, no French wanted to fly to America and the flagship of French technical prowess was being beaten by Le Rosbif
>.....was that it wasn't an American product.
Worse, it was French.
After all the costs of the refit following the crash in France, Concorde was just getting back on its feet when 9/11 happened
The attacks killed a lot of Concorde's regular customers and disincentivized a bunch of others from air travel.
Then when we decided on Operation Dodgy Dossier, the "Cheese Eating Surrender Monkeys" failed to see the intelligence in having a war with a country that had bugger-all to do with the attacks.
As a result even when BA Concordes returned to service, Air France were operating at 20%-25% capacity Paris-NY
>It would also be topped up via mid-air refueling which isn't an option for passenger flights.
Not with that attitude !
Also the SR71 leaked fuel not just because of the expansion joints, but because it didn't have fuel tanks. The special fuel it needed dissolved the rubber tank lining material of the day so it had to run with a wet wing
This project will be funded, but remember it is being funded NOT to build a SST
Boeing are in serious trouble. They announced they aren't even going to think about designing a new airplane for the next decade. All their engineers left, to keep their pensions in the MD takeover, Boeing had planned to buy Embraer to get a bunch of young cheap Brazilian engineers, when that fell through they opened a design center in Moscow to get all those cheap Russian engineers !
If US GovtNASA don't do something soon, Boeing are going to be reduced to half a dozen near-retirees doing 100 year updates on B52s and the next generation of US airliners are going to have to be bought from China - or worse - Airbus
Grumman are getting in on it because they lost out to Lockheed-Martin on the F35 and the US Govt is smart enough not to be reliant on a single seller of shiny new fighter jets
> is it because MS don't have a monopoly?
You don't need to be a monopoly to be guilty of monopolistic behaviour
If Tesla bought the company running Golden Gate bridge and only allowed Teslas to use it, that would be monopolistic behaviour even though Tesla aren't the only car company.
India Purchasing Power Parity (what you get for your $) is 24-25x the USA
I suspect that doesn't apply to paying rocket scientists - but India also has the advantage of not needing to build parts and operate duplicate facilities in 50 states.
Since manpower costs are likely the driver of the whole program, except for a few advanced semi-conductors that they have to buy in $, you can easily imagine how this can be done for 5% of the cost of a NASA or ESA mission
>Unlikely. The most rented film are overwhelmingly new releases:
Historically, but those people will switch to streaming. Netflix's stated (excuse?) was that the demand was for disks that are out of print and they only had a handful of copies. And that's the top disks but it's not clear what % of total rentals those represent.
I suspect though that it is no longer profitable if the only users are enthusiast heavy users, it's the old - you don't want gym freaks to sign up for your gym membership.
IIRC they are running out of DVDs. Most of their DVD customers now are art film fans who want obscure criterion collection disks that are getting hard to get.
They other DVD customers are people that live in deeply rural areas with bad internet, and it's hard to profitably monetize people who watch Deliverance every night
That a small group of people have clung to the service to have access to movies that aren't on streaming, or without having to go through a dozen services to find out who owns the rights to something this week.
To watch a movie in Blueray rather than in the revolutionary compressor blocky format.
To have directors commentary rather than unskipable ads on a service they are paying for.