Re: The only relevant question....
Between lead in petrol, Findus crispy pancakes and Sunny Delight - I'm assuming those of us born in the 70s are basically immune to chemistry.
21387 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
>Just how racist is the Scottish Assmbly, might I enquire?
Honest question from an ex-pat with no skin in the game - I was confused why our Aberdeen office had a strict rule against sportswear until it was explained to me.
Presumably the independants aren't big fans of the Conservative and Unionist party. On the other hand the wee-frees aren't full of Christian love and understanding for the left-footers.
So when the SNP gets to rule over an independent Scotland - who goes to the Gulags/takes advantage of Eu freedom of movement ?
Even cheaper if you add in the cost of administering free school meals, the armies of social workers etc to do assessments on who needs them etc
Presumably anybody who doesn't need free school meals is already opted out because little Trixie-Blossom can only eat vegan gluten-free organic moonbeams
Fingerprint scanners are a reasonable idea
They store a hash of a single print, ie. they aren't useful for implementing a final solution to the problem of the gingers among us.
They can't be lost (except that kid that got a 'D' in woodwork)
The payment can't be donated to Gripper Stebson (showing my age!)
> carriers should use actual weights rather than averages
I think that was specifically for these very small aeroplanes. I've been weighed on flights in the far North where you are wearing half of an REI store. It's done very discreetly so you don't see the actual number.
I don't imagine actual weight difference of 300 passengers on a 575 ton A380 makes that much difference.
Although I do think it is unfair that you get charged $1M/kg for overweight bags full of kit when Jabba the Hut's big brother is allowed to overflow into 3 seats for free.
I imagine a formal requirement.
Req: 3.141592654.... A load sheet shall be generated before boarding the aircraft
Therefore there is no mechanism for generating a new load sheet after boarding has started because that would be illegal. The formal requirements would be that in this event the flight is cancelled, a new load sheet is calculated, along with a new flight plan and a ripple effect that makes 1000s of flights delayed.
I was on a flight on some largish Boeing when they asked a dozen of us to move to the front of the cabin for takeoff.
Given that we were flying out of Houston and the other passengers all appeared to be either Sumo wrestlers or going to competitive eating event - I suspect the pilot took one look and thought; fsck what the balance software says
Mostly no - when it was started nobody had any idea how to do the electronics.
Building it hoping extrapolating that GPU/FPGA/storage would catch up was a reasonable plan.
Unlike a certain optical survey telescope that worried about the data size and spent most of the design time inventing their own tape drive technology, because nothing available could store the XXXX bytes of data expected.
Where XXXX is a number that sounded insane at the time but is now probably on your phone
Tricky balance.
There is reasonable evidence that the AF447 crash was caused by pilots who fundamentally didn't know how to fly, they were aircraft systems managers.
But there have been many more accidents by pilots who ignored warnings/faults/ATC and their crew because they had the biggest mustache
Yes because it was his job to tell the FAA.
He is not a test pilot in the "Right Stuff" sense - it's just a macho title for the job of signing off on the training requirements.
The engineers made the changes on the assumption that the effects of these would be made known to the pilots in a way that they could use them safely. Boeing decided there were business reasons for not doing that.
>If someone at the FAA had made the effort to check the design of the flight control system,
That's not really how regulated industries work.
If the FAA had to check every line of code in Boeing's systems they would need more programmers than Boeing with more experience of the Boeing software design than Boeing itself. At this point why not just have the FAA design all aircraft ?
If the FAA don't trust Boeing's design, can they trust Boeing's manufacturing? Do they have to have an FAA inspector standing next to each Boeing machinist watching what they are doing? Does this extend down the supply chain to all subcontractors? Does the FAA have to have a guy in the mine watching somebody dig out the bauxite?
The point of ISO9001 and ISO13485 and ISO all-the-bloody-rest, is that you say what you are going to do and you do it in the way you said. At some point the regulators have to trust you.
It's the same reason you have traffic laws rather than a cop sitting next to every driver.
No this is worse.
You could argue that the Pinto's fuel tank needed more protection - but you can always add more protection, more airbags, more safety features etc etc.
This is like having a hot exhaust pipe going through the middle of the fuel tank and then solving this by having an accelerator pedal that stops working if it gets too hot. And a single temperature sensor and not telling the driver.
With aviation I think it got even worse.
The NTSB were created because the FAA's remit was to promote air travel AND enforce safety - so every safety issue had to be resolved in a way that didn't harm the perception of air safety, ie. it was always the dead pilot's fault
Then there was a claim that post 9/11 the was an attitude that any criticism of Boeing was unpatriotic because B52s were vital in the war on terror.
Before everyone leaps in about "blaming some poor engineer" - he sent emails/texts bragging about how he had tricked the FDA by fixing simulator tests.
Career advice for prospective BOFH: whether you're rigging LIBOR or denying the existence of MCAS - don't leave an email trail.
The problem is that postal address to GPS (ie WGS84) coordinates is unreliable or expensive and done by the brilliant IT dept of a national post service.
What3words would presumably ask you to find your own address and at least check it's vaguely correct on the map. Rather than entering 100West 100Ave, precise name of local municipality rather than name of city.
Some sort of deal between Intel and Microsoft to screw over AMD? inconceivable !