Re: I think you missed this bit..
And also the part where it is clearly stated: "Quan was charged this week with being a felon in possession of a firearm"
1238 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Dec 2009
"I assume these multiple things need to be coordinated and triggered by some Heath-Robinson-esque contraption linked to a Raspberry Pi, preferably running an AI to detect the fox and learn which strategy is the most effective"
I experienced similar when going through my mother's things after her passing a few years ago. On the one hand, losing a parent is always difficult. On the other, finding treasures from your childhood or even ones you never knew about is both heartwarming and somewhat of a balm to ease the pain of loss.
A statement higher up in the thread gave me an idea - probably a stupid idea long ago considered and rejected by those far smarter than me. However, since a casual search reveals no evidence of such consideration and subsequent rejection, I must ask:
Stated above: 'If everything were getting smaller then the gap between things (e.g. the atoms in your body) would also be getting smaller." So why can't we measure the expansion rate more locally with, for instance, some mundane object of normal matter? Does the local gravity well slow the expansion rate OR is the difference simply too infinitesimal to measure with current instruments?
... Bulkhead Interactive's interesting puzzler, 'The Turing Test' but from the opposite perspective - you are the human, not the AI.
The person who provides the voice for the AI sounds remarkably like (but isn't) Jeremy Irons. And it's available on Steam as well as XBox Live.
in theory, you wouldn't have to remove the battery IF...
1. the phone is bubble-wrapped* and the bubble wrap is encased in tin or aluminium foil AND
2. the foil-wrapped phone is placed in foam/towel/etc* which is placed inside a closed metal ammunition box AND
3. the metal ammunition box is placed on a wooden shelf inside a steel safe which is then closed.
Any one of those three things is insufficient. Two of them MIGHT be enough. All three probably would. Of course, you would also need a hand-cranked or bicycle-powered generator (similarly protected) to charge the phone once you unwrapped it, but still.
* to insulate the item from the shielding. If they touch, the shielding is useless.
long before GPS was anything more than a military wet-dream we were taught to navigate using, among other things, an E6B flight computer. Pretty sure I still have one in a closet somewhere. Many modern commercial pilots probably have no clue how to use one.
interesting. I always thought it was Methanethiol but perhaps not. In fact, it largely depends upon the information source. Some say definitely methanethiol, aka methyl mercaptan. Others just say mercaptan, which could mean ethyl or methyl or some other variant like t-butyl mercaptan. One source says thiophane. And one or two flat out say NOT methyl but don't specify what IS added. Strange.
"There's a trap here in that a device (such as a phone, tablet or laptop) sold in 'rest of world' will typically come with a power supply that can handle 110 or 230/240 volts, but the exact same device in the US market will often come with a purely 110 volt power supply."
That has not been my experience at all for the cited items. Appliances/networking gear, yes, but not portable tech. I've not seen a 110VAC-only phone, tablet, or laptop in years.
Perhaps it IS a hole, just not the one we thought. Maybe the Great Green Arkleseizure is mooning us.
Hopefully the Coming of Great White Toilet Paper isn't nigh...
"You DO know that Form 1040 has just become tremendously SIMPLER this year"
My fresh-out-of-university son who had been filing 1040EZ the last few years would disagree with that statement. My own experience is that the "new" 1040 seems simpler because the threshold for itemizing deductions is now harder to reach and therefore many more people than before just take the standard deduction. That has the net effect of simplifying the process and shaving hours off required completion time. However, the actual 1040 form itself was only slightly simpler to me while the new W4 adds three extra pages of worksheet/instructions than before.
Yeah, that would be nice. Instead, I shall be submitting a request for reimbursement of medical expenses incurred when I slipped in the irony dripping from that title statement.
Not only is the US Tax system "unnecessarily complex" as you succinctly put it, but it's about to get even MORE ridiculous. Form W4 is what one fills out when beginning or changing employment and when filing conditions change such as marriage, the birth of a child, etc. This form is WAS a simple card to indicate how many individual deductions you are claiming so that your tax witholding can be calculated as reasonably close as possible. Beginning this year, that form becomes nearly as complex as the annual 1040 Tax Return form we all must fill out every April. And instead of simpler 1040 versions for simple tax situations, there is now only one form version - the long one, of course.
Kneptune Knots? Silly English Knnnnnnnnnigits!
I am NEITHER an engineer nor professional pilot and therefore lay NO claim to any authoritative knowledge on the matter. If you are a professional pilot and/or aeronautical engineer, feel free to correct me. This idea, however, seems logical to me:
Until a more permanent solution is devised, instead of having the MCAS system actually force the airplane to pitch down when it thinks it detects an impending stall, have it blare an unignorable alarm WITH an audible voice giving instructions such as "pitch down immediately to prevent impending stall!" or something appropriately similar. The humans at the controls are ultimately responsible for the aircraft and its contents. Provide them with the urgent data and corrective course of action but let them actually PERFORM that action. Not a perfect solution, but it is a quick one that will prevent this specific type of tragedy from recurring.
You are confusing Medicare with Medicaid. Medicare is quasi-government health care for pensioners. Medicaid is the program for the indigent. Medicaid definitely fits your description of "compulsary medical insurance which many low age earners can't afford to have taken out of their pay packet".
My own opinion is that we probably won't see an NHS-like system for the same reason we'll never see a simplified Federal tax code: because it takes power out of the hands of the politicians and those who stuff the politicians' pockets.
"I'm a Barbie girl, in a Barbie world. Life in plastic, it's fantastic..."
"Go on, get that out of your head. :D"
Easy. All I need is A Little Piece of Heaven
there are plenty of folks without such a moral compass who would gladly step in and complete the work she refused. The sad truth is that unless humanity overcomes basic urges to hurt/kill/maim/dominate others, and fairly quickly, this will end badly - most likely extinction by our own hand...