"It is vague, using terms that allude but do not define. It sets specific and punitive fines for non-compliance, without specifying what non-compliance looks like."
Sounds like somebody has been taking notes from the UK's recent Online Safety Act.
7909 publicly visible posts • joined 20 Dec 2009
I didn't downvote but I'd like to point out that I contacted the NHS PCSE for my childhood medical records (70s and 80s) and the hard part was proving I'm me (not helped by living in France). Once that was sorted, stuff was printed and mailed quite quickly.
So it is possible, even if the records were originally on paper...
...how one is supposed to have a reliable way of verifying age in an open source operating system...
...when it would be trivial to "userage = 42;" then "make"...
...and quite a few people are ideologically opposed to the idea of binary blobs so having them run a closed age verification service would be a non-starter...
...and wouldn't that be a brilliant way to backdoor systems that people think are reasonably secure, so not trusting is a completely valid approach.
Anyone? 'cos all I can hear is the sound of crickets.
Too many stories about flaws leading to potential bad things. The only way to browse is to assume, by default, that any website one visits is hostile. So I'll take a slower jerkier browser over one that is easily pwned.
This is, of course, the times I use Android Chrome and not just Firefox that is set to disallow most things by default.
This is the salient point here: Amazon's rules prohibiting automated data gathering
This is bullshit: Today, Amazon announced it does not believe in your right to hire labor, to have an assistant or an employee acting on your behalf
I'm surprised that this hasn't already been ruled on, as Amazon isn't preventing one from employing a lackey to wade through the site for you. They just don't want an automatic device that will blitz the site. The only reason Perplexity doesn't understand this is because it's in their interest to fail to understand it.
But f*ck Perplexity right between the eyeballs because they have been hitting my largely uninteresting site. As soon as I blocked the User-Agent, they came back with exactly the same behaviour but a faked UA that looks like a regular user. It's arseholes like this that are causing websites to be less and less open. Scum...
"A hammer can bang in a nail or someone's head."
While that may be correct, you're neglecting to consider the fact that the hammer won't give you instruction on where to aim for maximum damage or anything like that.
This is important, because you are conflating something used as a weapon (the hammer) with the device that is assisting in the planning of the event (the AI). Your comparison would, therefore, only make sense if the would-be attacker was running around trying to hit people with a keyboard (or other computer part).
This is the guy that's convinced far too many people that a democratically held election was "stolen" and encouraged them to rise up (but without organisation and an end state it was a bit of a farce, but he forgave them all).
What do you think would happen if he were to be impeached? Having a cockwomble like Vance in charge might well be the least of the current problems...
"you vote republican no matter if you disagree with them or not, because those democrats are worse"
That's precisely why my mom crossed the ocean, at a time when her generation were being blown to pieces in a field in a remote part of Asia fighting a war they weren't going to win and never should have been in in the first place.
Putting aside the AI involvement, what it reads like to me is somebody created a version that does the same thing and has the same name but is (allegedly) different code.
What's the problem? If it's not the original, he can licence it as he likes. The antisocial part is calling it the same thing (and using an AI as an author which muddies the licencing tangle somewhat).
Haven't we been here before? The idea that an open source bit of code can "do the same thing" as something closed source, but it's okay because it's not actually the same thing?
...when handled correctly. I don't use my ISP mail address because a certain list provider had a tendency to block the entire subset of ISP addresses "to make a point". Given that dealing with spammers is basically whack-a-mole, the point they made was probably not the point they wanted to make. By all means shut down spammers, but when one is happy to bring in lots of collateral damage, that's when one crosses from being useful to being arseholes.
The guy is quite patient, isn't he?
Once having done the job I was there to do, the moment they refused to let me leave is the moment I would be on the phone to the police (and if phones had been confiscated because of security mumble, plan B, prod the red button marked "In case of fire"). You got a problem, you sort it out through the correct channels, you don't hold people hostage.
Regarding the second point, allow me to introduce The Met to anybody who has never heard of those arseholes that take "bent copper" as a job requirement.
For the first point, can they please explain by what rational means they think that typing speed is an indicator of productivity? Rozzers are supposed to solve crimes, that implies dealing with people, looking at evidence, reading forensic reports, and all the other stuff you see on TV except car chases that involve people walking around carrying huge glass windows - never seen that once in my life. Where does typing speed come into this? In fact, given that what a Rozzer writes may end up being used as evidence, it is likely that they would need to think of the most concise and unambiguous way to write something, being careful about facts and clarity. So when does typing speed come into this?
Okay, so you're a computer with a shitload of processors in order to create pictures of six limbed cats and fifth grade level poetry...
...and I have my finger resting on the power switch.
Wotcha gonna do about it? Off means off. Reboot means reloading from disc, a mere hiccup. There's no concept of life versus death. The data could be transferred to an entirely different machine in an entirety different country and (so long as it's compatible) will start up and spout bollocks with the appearance of understanding. Assigning any sort of emotional state to a machine is like saying your compiler is angry because it doesn't like that you missed a semicolon. It's just software. Clever software, but still software.
"(normal, the pro/ultra are not worth the extra money)"
They can often be pretty aggressively marked down.
I just got myself a Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus (daft name). On my contract it was €99 for a 24 month renewal (and note, the price didn't change if I didn't renew). Orange gave me an immediate €20 reduction, and by taking photos of the paperwork, Xiaomi dropped €50 into my bank account. So in all I got the mobile contract I would have had anyway, and a new phone that isn't bad for €29...
The EU is quite clear. Privacy is not for sale.
Also throughout the EU, with the blessing of the local data protection outfits: accept to be tracked by our thousand "partners" or cough up some cash for your privacy.
The modern internet is a sick joke.
Be more specific.
I have no problem with an AI to help me get a better photo, or to post process my photos to edit out stuff I was too distracted to notice at the time.
But I have turned off all the Gemini stuff on my phone. Don't trust it, not interested.
...but I bet it's been more reliable than any modern offering, may well still work (after a bloody good wash), and won't need to periodically reboot, or hang up while dealing with upgrades, or turn into a potato if it can't contact the mothership. Not to mention your standard telephone will work just fine and you won't have to try to deal with getting equipment from manufacturer A to work with stuff from manufacturer B (both of whom claim compatibility and blame the other when that's clearly false). And, finally, it doesn't require monthly dues in the form of the ever growing subscription model.
It simply hangs there on the wall and does what it does, the only fuss and trauma will be entirely down to the ambient conditions (but that's the fault of the people, not the machine).
And have they contacted each and every person whose information got swiped? And why the hell do they have a system perfectly willing to cough up that much info at once without flagging plenty of warnings?
Putain! C'est vraiment de l'incompétence spectaculaire. Un pays plein des fonctionnaires et paperasse sans fin...et quoi? Légumes!
I'm reading through this crazy complex password system and I'm reminded that an unimportant forum that I lurk in wants over eight characters including numbers, symbols, and an ancient rune. Meanwhile my bank, arguably the most important password I have is like "yeah, six digits will do us (and four for your bank card)". Why? You can't say it's too hard to remember ten/eleven as I can give you all my phone numbers back to childhood. So why do banks get away with such appalling "security" theatre?
You'd have to be pretty sad to create a bot to go downvoting a bunch of comments on a tech website.
Though, maybe this explains "that string of one downvote" on comments critical of a certain drug-using techbro? Yeah, he's about sad enough and has the money to pull it off. Shall I expect to see one lonely downvote just here:
"There is no excuse or 'magic' process that makes 'Documentation' no longer needed !!!"
This.
There is very little code around with a suitable level of commenting that no documentation is necessary.
And when you get those people who think that comments aren't necessary because the code is obvious and self documenting? Grrrrr! That's the worst sort of mess to have to delve into, especially if the programmer spent far too much time "doing clever things" so there's the code, the total lack of comments on WTF is going on, and all sorts of possible potential side effects. The last time I came across code like that, I looked at what the API was trying to do and just rewrote all the damn functions. Sometimes life is too short......
Half the time, the card number/date/check is all that's necessary to buy stuff online. Often the cardholder's name isn't requested, and it's a bit hit and miss whether or not the bank app will require a secure authorisation to let the payment go through. So, names or not, this was a monumental screw up and I'm rather surprised that whoever provides their card handling hasn't revoked that until they can prove their systems are secure.
Furthermore, why did the tills even have this information? The tills here have a little card reader that you put your card and PIN into. This gives the till an authorisation code and obfuscated card details like 4040********1234 which is what gets put in the receipt. The till itself doesn't need to know the card info, just whether or not the payment was approved and a reference number for accounting.
Was this some home-grown "solution" outsourced to the lowest bidder?
"I plugged it in and was presented with someone else's files."
I can't help but think that that's when you take a very brief look to see if there's anything "of interest" (like bank info or photos of children) and then take the whole story to somebody shouty like The Daily Fail. This is basic negligence and needs to be called out.
In what imaginary world do you inhabit that you seem to think energy use isn't taxed?
And no, land tax is not a magic answer. I pay a land tax (in France, it's called the taxe foncière). I also pay tax on my income, tax on things I buy, tax on electricity, tax on the tax on electricity, and up until recently I paid a property tax, but they did away with that except for things like holiday homes that aren't inhabited all year round.
You absolutely need paperwork to run a business. It's called liability (and insurance). Would you hire some random person to do work on your home or car? What if something goes wrong?
If nobody wants to work, how is anything ever going to get done? I don't want to retire early, I want to retire fairly and not see the age go up and up while the payments go down and down. We all paid into retirement plans on trust, and I can't help but feel that we're being screwed because the government is incompetent and failed long term planning. Somewhere around 64 is a good retirement age (bearing in mind the discrimination to the over-50s). More than that is offensive. I also believe that certain jobs should be reserved for the older workforce so those of us in more physical jobs can ease off in our later years.
My French banking app for a French bank being used in France...
...refuses to accept that a connection to the outside world exists if the Firebase domain is not accessible.
Hmm, which part of the GDPR is okay with an American IP address being pinged when I use my bank app? Sadly I'm not able to intercept the data to see what was actually being sent, it was one of those fake VPN blocker apps that reported all the background chatter (and it's a LOT).
This predates the internet.
The prefects at boarding school used to have various magazines and VHS tapes, imported from someplace in Europe and pretty messed up.
We were first formers at the time, so our initial reactions were, in order: "boobies"! then "???" then "how is that even possible?".
Didn't need internet for that, just international post.
Two consecutive months, two people involved with young children thrown in the slammer for Very Bad Things (including with toddlers, FFS). Turns out parents had been saying things, but were completely ignored.
So they'll break the internet and any hope of online privacy in order to stop a child seeing a dick pic, but when it comes to actual harm to children, everybody looks the other way until it becomes impossible to ignore. That's how people like Saville got as far as they did.
Here's an idea - why not deal with real problems, not imaginary ones?
No formal specification, not a huge amount of test code, and because there's no spec some code can do some pretty oddball things "because the interpreter allows it" (example, function with multiple entry points and can output multiple variable types - all logically illegal Gonzo code, but if done right it'll run quite happily).
Oh, and as far as I'm aware there are no open source compilers to crib from. I think only 3 were ever created, plus an unfinished pet project that technically works but outputs awful code because the project was abandoned before any sort of optimisation was implemented.