Re: ".... reasonable to assume most UK citizens wouldn't ....,"
My apologies, it seems that I ignored an important legal change that happened in 1949.
Let's march to the guillotine fellow citizens!
1399 publicly visible posts • joined 14 Dec 2009
It's also reasonable to assume most people in the UK wouldn't want their personal data passed to any entity other than the one they're engaging with. There are, of course, reasonable exceptions that we would agree to if asked.
We have a government that has consistently ignored the rights of UK subjects with regard to the Internet (amongst other entities), ever since the UK joined the Internet. (<pedant mode> Yes, we are "subjects" of our monarch, not "citizens" of our country.)
Aren't there far simpler ways to use the heat of the Sun or the World's interior to raise steam and spin turbines.?
I'm all for nuclear fusion research, but hope it can do rather more than just raise steam.
Could it generate exotic isotopes , new subatomic particles or new elements?
Isn't pushing the limits of experimental parameters an end in itself?
Reminds me of the 70s/80s winters in East Anglia when I used to crawl in the snow to point a blowlamp at the sump and the (derv) fuel tank. Maybe Tesla could provide a "patch" to do the same with their batteries? Maybe a small coke stove with flues through the battery?
Oi! Get your place names right. Norfolk has a US airbase at Feltwell and some presence at Marham but no naval bases. Which Norfolk are you referring to?
If you just write "Norfolk, without qualification, it has to mean the original Norfolk, not one of the many places"named" by uninquisitive and unimaginative colonists. (When you move to a new country, it's polite to discover what the locals call your new location.)