Re: I would imagine...
No, but I would hire him to find weak-spots in my security
307 publicly visible posts • joined 9 Dec 2009
Here in Canada, this was a huge problem a while back., as there wasn't even a limit to the term of the contract and it got abused badly. Here is how it was fixed.
1: Fixed term contracts are now more or less a thing of the past. The operator is flat out no longer allowed to lock you in.
2: IF they finance the phone for you, they have to be upfront about how much it the phone costs and how much of it is payed each month on your bill, as well as letting you know what the balance on said phone is. They are not allowed to charge interests on this I believe. (My provider doesn't anyway)
3: If you decide to walk out, you have to pay off the rest of your phone and they have to give you a way to unlock it so you can use it on another carrier.
Paris, cause she as no fixed contract.
What struck me is this. How can they tell what hum is what?
Let's have a look at my own home computer. It's connected to a cheap UPS, is connected to the television and the sound system. Now imagine all those slightly out of phase 60 Hz frequencies all fudging together and trying to figure out what is what? How about taking into consideration the slight differences in frequency that might arrise in the CPU as I record ? Or how about a cheap recorder that doesn't work exactly 100% correctly as far as recording actual frequencies. Not enough to be distinguishable by human ears, but enough that they might not even keep it accuratly compared to themselves. Think cheap clock that isn't 100% stable in a digital recorder.
That's more like trying to tell who died and when by looking at the blood patterns in sea waves if you ask me. Or maybe they just believe the bullshit the guy with the fat commission told them.
"most current Oracle Linux users are customers who had existing Oracle support contracts and who migrated their Linux support to Oracle mainly out of convenience."
I think this is the most un-informet statement ever. No, they didn't move it "for convinience". The BEANCOUNTERS moved it for convinience. ANYONE who as to deal with the actual support will have found it the worst decision ever. Trying to get useful support from Oracle is like trying to get a strait, honest and clear reply from a politician, so "convinience" as nothing to do with it, from the IT perspective anyway.
Quite right to say they dumped it on Apache. It was rather hard for them to figure out what to do with it and having tried to turn it into a free money machine and failed, they found someone to throw it at. No one, ever, wants to have Oracle making decisions on a project they make, if only because that's like letting a blind idiot help you cross the street.
Libreoffice is the rightfull sucessor to OpenOffice.org
The new openoffice is just another Oracle poisoned product.
I'd just go with an intent of the law defence.
"Your honor, the lawmakers obviously made this law to prevent people from getting swindled out of money by diploma mills that offer worthless accreditation.
We offer courses built by extremely reputable Universities from around the world, our courses are free and the only thing you get out of it is knowledge, no diploma or accreditation. Where did we go against the law exactly?"
"All you have to do nowadays is mention Apple/Samsung/Microsoft and the idiots are jumping out of the woodwork to spew their bile."
That's not true. Even when Apple, Samsung or Microsoft aren't even part of the article, someone will find a way to insert them (especially Apple) in the comments.
the problem isn't the law prohibiting people from talking/texting while driving. It's that it's not enforced. Just driving to the supermarket I will be lucky if I don't cross 2 or 3 drivers talking on the cell, even when it's perfectly illegal. See a cop along the way? They are more likely to bust you for a tal light then cellphone.
As for texting ... words just fail me, so I'll settle for a nuclear explosion.
"Oracle clearly no longer gives a damn about Java or its user base..."
Oracle as never given a damn about Java, except to use it to sue people. As for it's user base, considering how "wonderful" PAYING support is from them, what do you expect for a free product?
Any compagny that as reps that ask "why should I help you with your problem?" when you call the million dollars a year support line shouldn't be expected to give a shit.
My understanding was this was all over Canada, but the Rogers comment above made me doupt. I know now, in Quebec, long contracts for cellphones with large fixed penalties are illegal. You can have a subsidised handset, but the "full price" on it as to go down each month, so the "penalty" for breaking the engagement is what is left to pay on the phone. In the end, you get a cheap/free phone and only have to pay for it if you decide to break the contract. They then have the legal obligation to let you unlock the phone.
While it sounds like a good idea, it's rather complicated and there is a much, much simpler way to do it. Properly document requirements. All the libraries, etc, will be opensource. That means if they publish the requirements, then any distribution with a decent package manager can just write a package and then all you have left to do to get steam on your computer from linux is open your favorite distribution's package manager and install steam.
Yea, I know this sounds revolutionary, but those of us who have used linux for a while are used to it by now.
You are working under the very flawed idea that all linux users must be pirates and cheap asses. You are missing the point. We just don't like to pay for something that as no value and is charged exorbitant amounts of money for. You get your computer from dell? Great, the copy of windows that came with it cost dell less then the time it would have taken them to install it (that's why they get you to do it), but if you build your computer, it becomes more then almost any single component in the computer.
Many of us use an open source office suit now, because there are "good enough" ones out there, so why pay again 100$ for one?
I'll pay to get the latest game I want. It's coming out in steam in September. If that ran on Linux, you can bet it would come back on my desktop.
@Interested Party: That just means you have never worked with the public. Having irrational people screaming (literally) at you for absolutly no good reason when all you are allowed to do is sit there and wait for them to run out of wind before you can so much as try to hang up politely can do more then just get on your. After months, it can give you nightmare as you realize some of those people may hold important jobs and are completely ignorant of how stupid they are. You may (or not) be a good example of this. Ask yourself and think carefully before you decide to answer.
The IP Lawers.
Seriously, both compagnies can spend themselves into a black hole without a clear winner, for the simple reason that a LOT of today's patents are just pure crap. When you have a patent on a design of the UI, then you have 20 more like it, it becomes nothing but laughing stock.
Patents are broken. They need a very serious scrubing and "back to basic" cleaning.
When it's that obvious you can do something, it shouldn't be patentable.
I honestly wish you could get an ARMs netbook. Windows supporting it will probably help (as much as I don't plan to have windows on my next netbook anymore then it does now)
The netbook form factor is awesome for what I use it for (amateur writing and as a console)
now if we could get ARMs CPUs in there and a display you can use outside, it would be perfect.
I agree it's insanely amusing that all they do is check the browser agent. Not only that, but they do even THAT poorly. Another microsoft "rating" that is absolutly useless, like the windows 7 "performance rating" that says my system sucks because I "only" have a sata3 drive and that isn't fast enough for them ...
Guess the FUD police woke up from the long sleep caused by windows vista