Posts by stopcern

'Doctor Dark Energy': The Ultimate LHC eccentric?

BIG BANG THEORY IS DOGMA

BIG BANG THEORY IS DOGMA (SUPPORTED BY CERN)

Dogma: a point of view or tenet put forth as authoritative without adequate grounds. Big Bang theory of cosmic creation is a quasi-religious dogma.

Many standard modern textbooks present it as a fact, though it is really only an assumption! CERN physicists BELIEVE in modern Big Bang Dogma. That is why, logically speaking, CERN physicists with such an irrational dogmatic mindset that work at the Large Hadron Collider and absolutely support these very dangerous high energy experiments are not real scientists at all. They are only blind-followers of modern dogmatic books, they are similar to quasi-religious fanatics, worshipping a new dark deity, that is called Big Bang. Strictly speaking, dogma remains a dogma even if today it looks more plausible, than some ancient dogmas. The fundamental assumption of Big Bang is based on the collective observations and subjective experiences, that may be considered as an egregorial illusion or mistake of collective unconscious, (collective unconscious, is a term of analytical psychology, coined by Carl Jung - a Swiss psychiatrist, University of Basel).

STOP CERN AT ALL COSTS

Physicists use the Large Hadron Collider to recreate the conditions just after the Big Bang, by colliding the two beams head-on at very high energy. So, they justify unpredictable high-energy experiments, and consequently endanger people living in Western Europe, only because they believe in Big Bang Dogma.

IF YOU LIVE IN WESTERN EUROPE, IF YOU WANT TO SAVE THE EUROPEAN CONTINENT, IF YOU WANT TO SURVIVE, AND TO AVOID POSSIBLE BIG CATASTROPHE, UNPREDICTABLE DANGEROUS CONSEQUENCES FOR PEOPLE, AS A RESULT OF HIGH ENERGY EXPERIMENT AT THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER IN WESTERN EUROPE, SIMULATING BIG BANG ON EARTH -- BY INCREASING COLLISION ENERGY TO 14 TRILLION ELECTRONVOLTS IN THE BEGINNING OF YEAR 2010. THEN STOP CERN AT ALL COSTS!!!

Big Bang Dogma is not the only framework available for understanding the history of the universe. Plasma cosmology and the steady-state model - both hypothesize an evolving universe - These and other alternative approaches - can also explain the basic phenomena of the cosmos - They have even predicted new phenomena - that were subsequently observed - something the Big Bang Dogma has failed to do.

- read works of Eric J. Lerner, Lawrenceville Plasma Physics (USA) at www.bigbangneverhappened.org , about Plasma Cosmology,

- read articles of Halton Arp, Max-Planck-Institute Fur Astrophysik (Germany), at www.haltonarp.com/articles , he claims, the assumption that high red shift objects have to be very far away - on which the Big Bang theory and all of "accepted cosmology" is based - has to be fundamentally reexamined.

- read articles of Paul Marmet, Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics (Canada), at www.newtonphysics.on.ca , about astronomical evidence that points to inconsistencies in the Big Bang theory.

- read articles of Domingos S.L. Soares, Federal University of Minas Gerais (Brazil), at www.fisica.ufmg.br/~dsoares/letbang.htm, rational arguments against Big Bang Dark Cosmology.

Lack of funding for alternative theories!

Fanatic supporters of the Big Bang Dogma from CERN may retort that alternative theories do not explain every cosmological observation. But that is scarcely surprising as their development has been severely hampered by a complete lack of funding. Indeed, such questions and alternatives cannot even now be freely discussed and examined. An open exchange of ideas is lacking in most mainstream conferences. In cosmology today doubt and dissent are not tolerated and many scientists learn to remain silent if they have something negative to say about the Big Bang Dogma. Those who doubt the Big Bang Dogma - fear that saying so will cost them their funding.

Even observations are now interpreted through this biased filter, judged right or wrong depending on whether or not they support the Big Bang Dogma. So discordant data on red shifts, lithium and helium abundances, and galaxy distribution, among other topics, are ignored or ridiculed. This reflects a growing dogmatic mindset that is alien to the spirit of free scientific inquiry.

Today, virtually all financial and experimental resources in cosmology are devoted to Big Bang studies. All the peer-review committees that control funding are dominated by supporters of the Big Bang Dogma. As a result, the dominance of the Big Bang Dogma within the field has become self-sustaining, irrespective of the scientific validity of the theory. Giving support only to projects within the Big Bang framework undermines a fundamental element of the scientific method -- the constant testing of theory against observation. Such a restriction makes unbiased discussion and research impossible.

We urge those agencies that fund work in cosmology to set aside a significant fraction of their funding for investigations into alternative theories and observational contradictions of the Big Bang theory.

Allocating funding to investigations into alternative theories, would allow the scientific process to determine our most accurate model of the history of the universe.

If you are scientist, and if you want to sign this statement, please visit the site www.cosmologystatement.org