@Aodhhan
"What's next... rape won't be a crime as long as it's done within the privacy of your own home?"
You might want to take the scarecrow and put it back in the corn field.
No one here is suggesting that we *remove* properly regulated powers of detention, search and seizure, no one is suggesting that we decriminalize things that are criminal actions.
What has been incontestably demonstrated, by mathematicians, Black Hat Hackers, White Hat Hackers, scientists, atheists, Christians, Muslims, Russians, Americans, Chinese and Africans is that if there is any flaw in any form of cryptography, someone will find it. And when they find it they will use that flaw. To steal, to abuse, to stalk, to harass, to rape, to kidnap.
Just because you have nothing to hide TODAY does not mean that the crap on your phone today will not someday be either illegal or questionable.
Just because the police forces have postulated situations where having immediate access to an encrypted device *might* conceivably, possibly, be of some value, does not stipulate that in fact, or in reality that that these situations or events have already or ever will occur.
Just because you *believe* you live in a free society and that you are comfortable with the laws of *YOUR* land does not mean that there are no others on the planet who are struggling against oppression and violence and *need* the security of being able to encrypt their communications.
Effectively they are throwing a hypothetical argument against scientific proof. Much like the anti-vaxxers out there.
Now, perhaps you might want to sit down and think about why some of us in the IT world, who have to deal on a daily basis with some 40 *plus* legal frameworks regarding various forms of data that must be secured while in our care are so completely and utterly and vehemently against this utter foolishness.
<seriously grumpy today - -management issue yesterday and an all nighter solving RPC locking issues.>
<edit fixed a typo or two>