Unbelievable
And not in a good way.
Others have highlighted several significant problems, and this is another one:
"The statistical Student’s t
-test was performed on the extracted radiomic features to identify those that are significantly different between the healthy and pre-diagnostic groups. About 4.5% of the total number of extracted radiomic features showed significance at a p-value of 0.05."
Which is no better than you'd expect at random and is the subject of an XKCD cartoon. https://xkcd.com/882/
This is actually an astonishingly bad example of ML and is likely just a random result. Why are El Reg publicising this crap?