Surely Boris' latest shenanigans with Northern Ireland will put paid to any trade deal?
34 posts • joined 12 Nov 2009
The key thing about OA is that it allows papers to be read by people working in the field in startups, SMEs, etc. Those are often the people who need access the most, but have the least money to pay for things.
Not everyone "qualified" to read a journal article is in academia.
eBay is closer to 15% in the real world just for the basics. Also don't forget the problems of fraud (eBay almost always side with buyers, so losses to "didn't receive it - refund me" claims are real, for instance), "optional" fees that are essentially mandatory in order to get any sort of ranking, and so on. eBay sellers I know reckon the real-world cost is anything up to 30% when calculated over a year.
Similarly for Amazon - the true cost (with referral fees, closing fees, etc.) can easily exceed 20%, and in some cases hit 30% (their fees are variable depending upon the category).
Frankly 30% isn't out of step with what sellers pay in the real world to list on platforms.
All Apple have to do is quantify the value in keeping old hardware refreshed with new software. It is that as much as anything else that creates the value in the App Store (an unfragmented market of potential app buyers); it is hard to imagine Apple would continue to support 5 year old devices if there weren't that virtuous circle available.
I think there must be many young people here :)
In the old days, you *paid* for OS updates. If you didn't, your computing device got progressively harder and harder to keep going. You often *had* to pay for the OS update *in order to* use the latest software. Even now in the Android world, unless you're using vanilla Android then you're playing roulette as far as receiving support is concerned.
Today, I can install iOS 13.7 on an iPhone 6S, a device released 5 years ago. Not only can I install it; unlike in the bad old days, it will run (like-for-like software) at least as fast, and in some cases faster, than the original iOS 9 it shipped with.
I do not want to go back to the old days. I'm very happy that the markup I pay for App Store purchases goes to fund the continuing development of the OS and its support on older platforms. It keeps my hardware fresher for longer; it keeps my hardware more valuable for longer; it allows me to keep on buying apps from developers via the App Store for longer.
By doing this, Apple *more than* justifies its mark-up; by doing this, Apple ensures there's a tremendous (and unfragmented) market for app developers, which in turn allows app developers to prosper.
Let's not forget that the App Store itself was an innovation.
It is not a coincidence that app developers (as a whole) make *far* more money on Apple. Sadly, however, that last may be their undoing; if developers make more money on iOS than on Android, perhaps that shifts the balance in terms of market position and anti-competitiveness? If it does, however, it will be IMHO a very sad day, since the model will have proved itself so good as to be destroyed!
If Business Rates were a fixed amount per square foot across the UK, for all types of property, that would level the playing field somewhat. If you consider how much trade Amazon, say, can generate per square foot you'd rightly question why they pay so much less than the small shop down the road...
I sincerely hope the Epic case goes nowhere. Apple’s current model incentivises them to maintain software support for older devices, one of the reasons I choose them. That also benefits the likes of Epic, as more users have supported devices able to run their games.
The alternatives don’t bear thinking about for those of us who’ve experienced them in the past.
I’ll admit I’m pretty staggered at the blinkers in this thread.
As much as anything, that 30% pays for OS development.
I’m an Apple user. I’m very happy with the deal I have - buy a phone every couple of years, get free OS updates and security fixes, access to an App Store that “just works” in delivering me free and paid content, etc.
And I really like the fact that every software developer gets the same chance of me downloading their app from the same store.
As others have said, 30% is not huge in mark-up terms. There’s this obsession with the idea that the internet is cheap - it is not, but it is flexible.
Fortnite’s developers don’t like that their successful app should be so encumbered. Of course not - successful companies always like to “pull up the drawbridge” when they’ve made it.
The *next* successful app can just as easily come from a small startup under the current model. Which is yet another reason why I like it.
I think the bit people are missing is that Ring is a fantastic name if you want to expand into non-English-speaking countries. Onomatopoeia at its best. Nest doesn't translate at all well, by comparison.
Amazon are not just buying tech; they're buying what should be the go-to brand name in this space.
On the subject of local cells on emergency vehicles, would there be anything wrong with using satellite backhaul from vehicles? This doesn't seem a stretch.
In fact, that seems an ideal solution to the data services problem. COTS-related WIFI/4G devices, hybrid satellite/4g vehicle-based bases, etc. Pretty much guaranteed coverage anywhere on the face of the nation.
As regards TETRA, is there any reason it cannot simply be nationalised?
4G standalone seems madness...
Just because in your mind the case does not exist, does not mean the case does not exist.
In many industries, PCs are tools, with an expected life in decades. Medical equipment, CNC machines, whatever. Air gapping there is all about simply not connecting them to the internet / a network (BSG75 style) - we're not talking national security.
The threat is therefore not theoretical. Infection vector is an issue, of course, but even those old machines need updating sometimes, with a (potentially infected) USB stick say.
Fast forward a few steps and find deep learning embedded into malware - searching for the best form of comms... This research is actually useful, because it forces those who need to think about these things for their situations to think further about every part of the machine (not just the ethernet jack).
There's a great guy (Ian Mapleson) whose sort-of-business is supplying SGI IRIX hardware to people who need it. Lots of CT scanners and their like still run by Octanes and their ilk, apparently. It is said there are still knitting machines run on SGI Indys.
Obviously his business gets smaller every year, but equally the amount people are prepared to pay for working hardware may nonetheless be enough to make it just about tick over.
Surely the solution is easy - provide a network-accessible KVM. Either 1 per CNC machine, or 1 that can be plugged into the relevant CNC machine with ease. Turn it on when needed; turn it off when not. With proper access control, this is as secure as it needs to be for remote support purposes.
My personal beef with the park ruling is this: according to the Parish Council it is "unfair to expect non-running residents to pay for path maintenance."
Let's think about that for a moment in the context of a different example. Only 2% (at most) of the population use wheelchairs: it is "unfair" for the remaining 98% to pay for drop kerbs and the like - we must levy wheelchair users.
Governments (large or small) operate on the basis that they provide services which, whilst not used by everybody, are available to many/most and benefit society.
The Parish Council provides a park. A small (and, yes, it really is only a small) number of people are now regularly running in the park. The promotion of exercise is in the public interest - in fact, it is likely the only reason why there is suddenly a concern over "wear and tear" is because the residents of Little Stuck are too f****ing lazy to run the rest of the time.
The Parish Council have decided that it is not their public duty to provide a park for people to exercise in. What next - individual joggers getting levied? Mothers with babys? After all, it is "unfair" to expect those not using the park to pay for those who are...
...oh, wait, that would be exactly the point of centralised provision of recreational facilities...
I'm sorry but this ruling is nonsense. A race to the bottom in ebooks helps nobody. The current prices seem reasonable reward for all concerned.
I'm not an Apple fanboi but, pre iDevices, the mobile space was nowhere. Fragmented crappy interfaces and fragmented crappy markets. Apple delivered easy to use devices, and stores where you could easily and cheaply buy content. It was a revolution.
eBooks for 99c? How will that help deliver great content? I'm one of those who was fine with the 'net book agreement' in the UK.
Apple's actions harmed nobody. A class action suit is pointless. Free markets don't necessarily make great content available for less money - they mostly make crap content available for less money. The value is seldom in the cheapest products.
Apple are a great business. They have produced devices that people want to buy and which, by and large, work very well. Nobody is compelled to buy them. Would people like them to be different? Perhaps, but then they wouldn't have produced the same devices...
I'd buy an iPad mini, at a similar price to a regular iPad. The form factor is valuable to me. If Apple's research says that the form factor is important to others, and that they will gain more in additional sales than they lose in those who would have bought a full-size iPad, they will be ahead.
I can't put my iPad 1 in my pocket. I won't buy an iPad 3 because it is too big, I won't buy an iPod touch / iPhone because it is too small, and the apps I need aren't available on Android.
Re 'cart' I suspect this might be one of those custom-made 'charging carts' designed for educational establishments. That would mean that every single Mac was powered in some way, creating some problems.
In tema of 'trauma', anybody working in a school and claiming to be traumatised by child urine seriously needs firing for the good of humanity.
Sorry, are you suggesting that there cannot be a malware app on an Android device which could attempt to bruteforce windows logins?
If the Wi-Fi access point is serving multiple laptops (or even desktops) then is it impossible for an Android device's wifi interface to be put into promiscuous mode?
It is all very well to cry that something is impossible, but proving that contention is a bit more tricky, I'd have thought!
For those who claim that it is not feasible that Assange could be charged by the US for committing crimes outside of the US, you are being rather naiive.
For reference, look up the so-called NatWest Three. These men were indicted in the USA of offences which, if they occurred at all, did so on UK soil, and which were not actually illegal under UK law at the time.
Sadly, the UK has entered into an extradition agreement with the USA which does not allow UK courts to consider the legality or otherwise of the charges, but merely must rubber-stamp any correctly-executed extradition request. That lack of legality is not germane!
So all that is needed is an indictment and Assange will be toast. Hopefully, however, the UK's students will swing into action and attack the courts concerned!
Online gambling has been held to be illegal in the USA. A British businessman, who has not operated in any way in the US but has taken money from US citizens, has been arrested and tried in the USA for this. Online gambling businesses take credit card and/or PayPal payments every day; these are "illegal" activities in the US.
Unfortunately, this is all terribly reminiscent of the catch-all UK legislation prohibiting the possession of "items which could be of use to terrorists"... such as a map, for instance, or a pair of scissors... in effect, governments of all hues like to pass catch-all legislation which can be used to declare any act illegal or person guilty when it suits them. This is not the form of governance we should aspire to, it is not the sort of governance which should be wrought in our names.
How long before we can persuade the people of one nation - perhaps ours - to rise up and demand: "treat me better"?
Sugar's principal money came from Amstrad. He took his returns in cash and put them into extensive property holdings in Mayfair et al.
At one time Amstrad were Europe's largest PC manufacturer; by his own admission, he underestimated the speed of change in the PC market, and didn't innovate fast enough to maintain that position. But he made a lot of money in home computers, one way and another.
Similarly he made a lot of money from Binatone clock radios and such like. The Sky boxes came later on, and were profitable, as was Viglen, but the main money is in property.
He is shrewd and pretty honest, including about himself. I'm no defender of his, but he is what he is and has done well from it. Most of us are in no position to criticise!
I really don't understand what the problem with Street View is. I can go to any street in the UK, set up a step ladder on the pavement, and have a look around. Why shouldn't Google allow me to do this without going there?
If people don't want to be seen on a given street, don't go to that street. There are many problems with privacy, but Street View really isn't one of them in my opinion.
This precise functionality - with a GUI - has been in IRIX since at least 1993 with the introduction of IRIX 5.x. Try to do something that requires root access and up will pop a dialogue asking for - you guessed - it the root password, or the credentials of another privileged user.
Surely there must be a way of sorting out prior art challenges to this nonsense before it gets granted, isn't there?
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020