Most of this could have been cleared up much earlier if...
... the Post Office didn't have the means to start criminal prosecutions without going through the CPS (or equivalent).
This power must be revoked immediately.
1185 publicly visible posts • joined 15 Oct 2009
There was no audit logging.
No any form of double-entry by the looks of it.
I've only worked in accounting software once, and when I said "we have two ways of tracking transactions" shall I get rid of one, the accountant in the team said "no! great, keep them both, we can use them to counter-check against each other". A principle that seems lost in Horizon (probably, to this day. Which lays it open to fraud.).
As a contractor I worked for this outfit, one of my earlier contracts. On more than one occasion I worked late when there was a board meeting going on, where I knew that I could get a cheque written out and signed by the finance and one other director, to pay me my three month overdue invoices.
And if you worked there, you'll know why this ------>>>
I went to T-Mobile labs in Bellevue.
THe building was grey, and completely anonymous, no company logos, because it contained bleeding edge not yet released mobile handsets, and squillions of dollars of test kit.
HOWEVER, they overlooked one thing, near the main entrance was a reserved parking space. And on that space, they had painted "T-Mobile Employee of the Month"
When I was at school doing Physics pre-O-level, I was playing with the on-bench mains sockets, as one does, put a big nail into the earth and a compass into the live, and joined them together.
My teacher was watching me do it, apparently...
Then I threw the switch on the socket and BLAM! big flash and the power went out.
The scary head of department then appeared about 10 seconds later and demanded to know why the power was out.
I don't know why to this day, but luckily the teacher gave some excuse, and the head went away.
I got a minor bollocking, which was all good in retrospect. I went on to get A's in Physics (and more besides) then A's in Physics A level, being taught by said head of department, plus S level too, an AS Electronics. And then a degree in Electronics/Computing and the rest is history.
I stilll have the compass somewhere with the weld mark in it.
Well I've had a few, but one stands out. After reading the above, it's a bit lame but here goes....
I went to an interview with a S/W and H/W company somewhere in the Midlands. The main interview goes reasonably well, and at the end they hand me a sheet of A4 paper.
On the paper is a list of TLA's, and the final task was to say what each one stands for.
After about 15 of them, they started correcting me here and there, "yes but in our company it means 'Total Concept Paragigm'" or whatever.
After almost an hour and and into the third column my mind started exploding, and when I got to the end I was spent.
I can recommend this as a form of torture! Probably it should be banned by the ICC.
I didn't get the job. Phew!
I had a client who stiffed me for about £1200 while I was working away overseas, doing more than 37.5 hours a week because it was in Taiwan, and on a critical project.
Unknown to me there had been a max hours edict from upper manglement for cost cutting.
My middle manager didn't back me up up on my invoices, and they didn't even pay the 37.5 hours while they disputed.
After several months of reminders I asked them to at least pay the 37.5, and the rest remained in dispute.
5 years later it was apparent I wasn't getting another contract with them, so I took them to small claims for statutory interest. I got awarded £1500. By that time, Motorola had bought them, so had to pay, which was an added bonus! :-)
If they are going to "rake over the coals" as intimated by this latest article, and revisit previous compensation settled "in full and final settlement" because some of the evidential inputs to the decision making/tribunals/ombudsman were false, perhaps they should also consider funding the revised settlements, at least in part, from recovered bonuses paid out to the board over the same timeframe?
Because it seems to me that these bonuses were awarded based on PO profitability, which would have been less if the proper settlements had been made at the correct time, based on the actual facts, not something made up.
It's all going a bit nuclear!