Re: Citizens Are Wondering About Their Money...........
Derisking for a start. It's not like we've learned what happens if a single vendor screws up recently and how widespread a problem is...
681 publicly visible posts • joined 16 May 2007
Speak for yourself
For those of us who are boring and get on with IT and not absorbed in the latest fads and AI willy waving designing around really bad scenarios is entirely what you do.
Plan for the worst, hope for something less intense to go wrong... But expect something to absolutely go wrong.
Sure, we don't know if it is comparable.
But I'm guessing from the article it's in a DC so things like a UPS are part of the deal.
As to redundancy, how do you know if they had that level of redundancy to begin with - it isn't just globally redundant by being 'in the cloud' anyhow.
You seem to think that the existing setup covered all the things you think he might need to spend money on, or have to spend money on later. I doubt it.
We're very much a small outfit by comparison but there is *no* doubt in my mind that we're better off financially and operationally by not being 'in the cloud'. It isn't even a close competition. It's the difference between 'we exist' and 'we would have run out of cash'
Surely the questions should have been:
1) Why is * 365 so unreliable?
2) Why is OneDrive and SharePoint so god damn bad still?
3) How do you make your Exchange so latent and break sync compared to on-prem run by others?
4) Why do you undercut your own partners on pricing for the Office part?
5) Why do you keep renaming the damn products confusing the hell out of people?
6) Why do you deliberately cripple the full no-sub office compared to the sub office given the cost?
7) Why do you still refuse to let small businesses use 365 office on RDS without the VL or Enterprise requirements?
There are doubtless more.
Well given Openreach only provides the circuit, but not the way for it to get to the internet, not the routing, peering, transit, support and so on, it isn't that amazing that the cost you have to pay is more than the Openreach cost.
In other news, when I buy bread, the cost is considerably more than the flour. Who would have thought it.
Funny because I've been typing for many years and I really like the design of the keyboard on the 12" MacBook (mine is thus the first generation butterfly) - I've had zero keyboard faults, and it's by far the keyboard I can type best on.
I've also got a 2018 Macbook Pro (15") which is 3rd gen butterfly I believe. It's not quite as nice - primarily because the keys are further apart on that larger device, but I still don't have any real issues.
The travel is a matter of preference, and I really don't experience the trauma that others do. Perhaps I'm more adaptable to different keyboards as a "professional keyboard nerd" that has to use lots of different computers in my day to day work... who knows.
Whilst it is clear there is a vocal minority that don't like these keyboards, Apple still sells several million laptops a quarter so it doesn't appear to be hurting sales that much.
Now if there is a keyboard to bitch about, that has to be the "magic keyboard" Apple sells - it is garbage. Why don't more people bitch about that??!
I'm not sure your argument works.
I've got customers "in the sticks" (really in the sticks) with FTTP connected and fine at 330 meg. My office, in a City Centre, in a very popular area has no FTTC or FTTP at all, and we're only able to get ADSL2+ unless we pay for fibre ethernet ourselves. Being "in the sticks" is not always and is increasingly thanks to the gov funding projects not a problem - it's actually reversing the issue as FTTP is more effective to deploy in those rural areas with few properties than many FTTC cabs serving 1-2 premises. It can be the case that rural is worse, but it is also the case that it can be significantly better.
We have in most respects got a national operator - eg Openreach - but actually that's not all that helpful because as they have zero competition in many areas they are frequently lacking in service delivery and inefficiency. It's noticeable when you find there is competition that they magically do a better job...
Yeah I'd agree - our company domain listing from HIBP has an awful lot of never-existed aliases and some that are blatantly never going to exist and aren't even a good effort.
It is interesting though that some are either guesses at possible aliases for staff that really do work for the company even though we've never set those aliases up and have no intention of doing so. Presumably someone once guessed at addresses, then got breached and those not-actually-true addresses got added to the growing list of nonsense.
The insolvency/admin firms charge incredibly high rates and extract all the remaining money out of the business. Most if it goes to them (£1.1m in this case), and the £600,000 left went (shared out) to anyone who could make a claim - creditors generally get a few pence in the pound (if that).
These firms have "charge out" rates of £80 for something like an administrator/office junior type per hour, and then end up in £400-£800 per hour for the "senior" people. It's a nonsense.
The only upside of Windows 10 is that it is actively helping increase the amount of work It support people get - which is ultimately more paid work.
That's it.
It's the first partner friendly move they've made, but I don't think it was intentional...
"Axing the Essentials line is a calculated risk for Microsoft. While its Office 365 product remains the clear market leader, small businesses may look to the likes of Google's G Suite in future. "
Huh? Server essentials has sod all to do with Office in any form, so ditching the Essentials Line won't have any difference in that respect.
"Can't you add..."
(a) No, because that's not the host name used for Windows Update
(b) No, because Windows has a hard coded list of locations including IP addresses to ensure malware can't so easily stop updates & to prevent hijacking that it uses as well as looking things up
I’m pretty good at predicting accurately when it’s a good time to install updates.
So accurate in fact I’ve got a 100% success rate.
The problem with the new plan is that it doesn’t matter if I went to get a cuppa, or went away for the weekend, I might well have left the system on and in a particular state for a very good reason. There’s not a predictable “good time” for me, other than “when I am ready”.
I’m sure many others feel the same, but why Microsoft cannot just accept it and let us have more control is beyond me. Maybe come up with compelling features we want to install and not useless toot we couldn’t care less about and you’ll find more active updating being done.
You can run 150 web sites off one IPv4 address with TLS. It's called SNI. It's been around for ages. Unless your devices are really old it'll just work.
That's how it is done.
That said, I don't agree with this move by Google. It's poorly considered and will mislead people again. The problem with "secure" is that it is not secure - it's just encrypted between you and the point it terminates at. The site could have a web page under HTTPS that is spewing out all your details openly - it's not in any way an indicator of secure.
Not quite....
This adds the ability for my iPad (which is on o2 as it happens) to be able to make and receive calls to/from my EE number, even when my iPhone is not on, not connected, not on the same network.
So if you say had a BT Landline and called my mobile number, and I had run out of battery on my iPhone, but my iPad was still good, if it had connectivity (cellular - not needing to be EE... or wifi), my iPad would ring and I could take the call. For example on Saturday my iPhone was at home, I was 15 miles away and my iPad let me take a call from a non-facetime user.
You could previously do this but only if the iPhone was connected/nearby the iPad - so the scenario I describe didn't work.
However, a few clarifications...
EE web site suggests this works for texts - so far, it does not work independently of the iPhone - you could already, on watch and iPad send an SMS but it would relay via iCloud and send to the iPhone to send for you - likewise receiving it. This is STILL the case now - but it's implied in various places by EE that won't be the case - but neither my watch (cellular or wifi) or my iPad can relay or receive SMS if my iPhone is not on and connected - so nothing has changed in SMS terms[1]
[1] not to be confused with imessage which does work regardless but obviously is only of use if the other party is also an imessage user.
"Facebook failed to respond to The Register's repeated requests for clarification on how former users would be alerted to the potential misuse of data."
...well if Facebook acted as responsibly as they should then they wouldn't hold the data of former users in order to have any method years on to directly contact them...
...this privacy stuff is difficult right :-)
Or more accurately...
AAISP provide a normal PSTN Line, but then add a feature to nobble its use. They also just happen to charge a bit less for said line, and choose to forgo higher margins others make.
However, other ISPs provide said PSTN line for £10 (like AAISP) but do let you use the phone line for voice calls - it's the same wholesale service, without the nobbling.
In the case of AAISP you are paying for a line you can't use for voice but it's an ordinary line, they have no special sauce.