Re: Pretty neat
That would also thwart the IR scan attack.
People who rely on their muscle memory would have to unlearn that if such measures are introduced.
5950 publicly visible posts • joined 8 Oct 2009
Your reading comprehension is beyond abominable.
Is it up to them? I thought we voted for MEP's, it was one of those claims of democracy.
Regardless of whether one's elected democratically into a council or parliament (and through whatever method, FPTP, PR or Preference Voting) anyone in that assemblage can have their personal opinion on whether to like or dislike a particular member, considering him or her worthy of a seat or not, and wanting that member to stay or leave. And I doubt there's much love lost between MEPs with BRemain leanings and Nigel Ravage. I do doubt that quite strongly.
The promised referendum which will be carried out once the result is in should be carried out.
You had your referendum already, and I gathered the BRexiters didn't want another one.
I dont know who your MP is.
I already mentioned that I am not directly affected by BRexit, but to help you grasp what I mean by that: I am neither an UK resident nor an UK citizen, and ergo I do not have a "my MP".
If he is a man of principle then he is right to wait there until we actually leave the EU
One may take that view, yes. Another is that he's involved in, and paid by, an organisation he despises, an attitude one may well call hypocritical and dishonest.
So if we remain in the EU then the remain crowd want him (as well as all MEP's) to be employed there
Given his recent speech, do you really think his fellow UKMEPs still want him there? And I doubt that any BRemainer has had positive feelings about him anyway.
You want him out then tell your MP
Who would that be?
He shouldnt need to quit unless the democratic vote is being ignored.
Out of principle would be another reason. But that's a word that's apparently not in Ravage Farage's vocabulary.
We didn't have a bloody 2/3 majority vote to get into the draconian shitpile attempted superstate
From the moment you got in up until two weeks ago you could have influenced (and did) how that "draconian shitpile attempted superstate" functioned. That, IMO, allows for a lower threshold on entry: because you can have a say in which way things are to develop. Furthermore, economic and social conditions have changed a bit over the 40 years you've been in; both within the UK and the EU as well as globally; it would behoove all of the involved to take that into account as well, and setting a different threshold for exit now might well be one of the consequences of that.
The tories are in power and Cameron is in charge so UKIP having an exit plan (fairly sure they do) is irrelevant especially as Nigel has been excluded from the leave talks. [...] Can you imagine any tory crowing about an exit plan, Osborne and Cameron would do anything to scupper it.
There's nothing to stop you from preparing an exit plan even if you expect not needing to use it, and equally, not being able to crow about it doesn't excuse you from preparing one. On the contrary, having one and presenting it once it's become necessary shows you as being prudently prepared (at least if the plan is halfway realistic, anyway). This holds for Farage too; even if he was excluded from the official campaign, there's nothing barring him from having a plan ready for the event of Brexit. Stating clearly and unequivocally beforehand that he won't be making one, instead considering a win to be all he wants and that's it would be fine too.
For quite a few of those involved, it has shown them for what they are.
When did he promise that? And even if it shows he has kept that promise, how about his promise to resign as UKIP leader if the 2015 election results didn't show a significant breakthrough for them (which they didn't).
Never mind that pro-Brexit ended up being a pile of half-truths, numbers-finagling and plain impossible items, going into the Euro Parliament with an exit speech consisting of lies and insults ("none of you have ever had a proper job") doesn't make his promises any more valuable.
Not that I'm directly affected by Brexit; if I was I'd be seriously miffed by all this. And not just Farage and Johnson for running away from what I consider their responsibility, also the major clusterfuck that the referendum was: lack of clearly defined procedures (if it's advisory, don't act as if it's binding; how and when to invoke A50, and by whom; some kind of contingency planning for both outcomes, etcetera)
After more than eight weeks aloft, I suspect they were getting more than a little miffed with not being allowed to sharpen their claws.
By the way, how many Super Tigers rode that previous balloon? No mention of the weight of even one such tiger (a normal one is about 300kg, 71 jubs), nor of that balloon's lifting capacity. Inquiring minds want to know.
MRI, as a tool for looking inside your noggin while it's still more or less functioning*, is quite OK. Which can, and has been, calibrated by scanning corpses and cutting them up**.. What happens to be a problem is interpreting correlations in activity in different brain areas, for instance the physical stimuli as caused by consuming Coke (or coke), and the associated feelings.
* mine nearly wasn't, and MRI showed the cause, allowing the correct medical treatment. Guessing would have had well over 50% chance of being dead wrong.
** Or so I've been told by someone working at Philips Medical Systems.
The measuring instruments were all (?) badly calibrated.
The problem is not the scanner; going from MR data to images does produce images that look quite like slicing your body and taking piccies of that, but it's less invasive. Living people tend to prefer it that way. The problem is the statistics software used to correlate bits of brain activity, and while it's essential to the research mentioned, I wouldn't classify it as 'instruments', those being something you can kick.
"The shift between short and long wavelengths will show if the gravitational waves from super kicks are being directed towards or away from Earth."
The wave we detect is always directed at Earth, otherwise we wouldn't be able to detect it. What a Doppler shift would show is whether the source is moving towards Earth, or away from it.
On top of that, much as I really don't agree with the amount of power the "financial markets" have over us, the fact is that they do,
How much of that power can be attributed to the global financial market, how much to the EU and how much to the Euro (which the UK wasn't part of anyway)?
You're replying to Camilla Smythe, known (but apparently not to you, yet) for stringing together techno-gobbledygook apparently to rile up other commentards and garner downvotes.
Note that CS has, in this case, vehemently excluded the most obvious route to solving the problem. A tactic observed more often.
I looked at Arduino, and it was US$85 dollars for a wi-fi shield. Ridiculous.
Sounds like you're looking in the wrong place then. The average Chinese tat bazaar like DealExtreme, TinyDeal and BangGood has them starting from US$15, occasionally even cheaper. And even sites like Adafruit and Sparkfun have them for less than half of that US$85, including Arduino base boards with integrated WiFi.
If you need a micro-USB for supplying power: obtain one of those wireless charging gizmos you can fit inside a smartphone (such as this one http://www.amazon.com/Universal-Wireless-Charging-Receiver-micro-USB/dp/B00H7FJXCC/ Mind the orientation of the plug w.r.t. the cable) , open it up (they all seem to have the actual electronics and coil sandwiched between two plastic sheets that come apart fairly easily), figure out the polarity, unsolder the flatcable from the electronics and solder some wires on.
For full-blown (micro-)USB/HDMI I'd start by looking at DIY plugs and male PCB-mounted connectors. I had no actual need for those, so I don't have links to usable items.
(This rasise the question of what happens if a gravitational wave arrives from vertically above.)
For one detector that would indeed cause it to not detect it, but there are three: one at 119W, one at 90W and one at 10E. Given that the Earth is, roughly, a sphere, for two of the detectors an incoming wave can not be coming in from straight above if it is for the third.
It's a physical property, one of the four fundamental interactions of nature, and the one that works over the greatest distance.
The human concept is calling it "gravity", "Mass times other mass times capital G over distance squared" would be more precise, but rather cumbersome.
This research also reveals that the researchers involved have had no fundamental interactions with cats before.
One of our cats has a perfect understanding of gravity. She has even figured ways to thumb* her nose at it.
* Non-opposable, which she probably regrets, but which in the long run is quite likely better for all involved.