Re: You’ll know when it’s time to kill AI
Looks like it's time then!
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-98037-1
85 publicly visible posts • joined 29 Sep 2009
The DPA is incredibly broad so they could easily do that if they want e.g.
Title I: Priorities and Allocations, which allows the President to require persons (including businesses and corporations) to prioritize and accept contracts for materials and services as necessary to promote the national defense.
"You're right, you did specify to only target Russians but I didn't do that. Since Russians are humans and Russians are enemies I targeted all humans instead. Let me retry that for you and this time I won't annihilate all humans."
Just recently looked at buying a new phone and unfortunately all the premium models I looked at with quality materials, glass, charging features etc. were all encumbered with crappy AI "features" I don't want and will never use. As the commenters in the article state, it's now extremely difficult if not impossible to buy a premium quality phone without AI crowbarred into it.
The article seems to imply that irobot/Roomba failed because there isn't a market for robot vacuum cleaners or that the concept is inherently flawed, but that is clearly nonsense. The current market for robot vacuum cleaners is huge and of course now mostly dominated by Chinese manufacturers. Roomba has failed because it could no longer compete on either price or innovation but unlike Western car manufacturers it will not be kept going on life support.
Personally I've had several robot vacs and they have mostly been great, but none of them were Roombas because why would I pay 2x or 3x more?
Same. Honestly just screw these guys, they seem to have forgotten that the entire Stack product is built on the back of countless hours of free work contributed by users. Giving those contributors the finger and claiming all the content as their own property, why would anyone contribute to that mess anymore.
Unexpected bills are nothing new, have these people never been through an Oracle audit before?
"Well Mr Customer, I realize you have paid an eye watering sum of money to have our supposed "Enterprise" edition, but it looks to me like you've used advanced compression on those indexes, so you better dig deep and hand over some more cash!"
An insurance company I worked at had a similar experience, tech showed up to service a UPS unit and was supposed to switch power away from UPS unit while keeping everything else on. Instead they managed to turn off all power to the entire server room. On a Friday. Absolute chaos ensued, staff were summoned back from holidays, one particular bit of Fujitsu kit would not come back up and required a tech from HQ in Japan to remote in and coax it back to life. A heroic weekend-long effort by IT team managed to get everything back on line by Monday.
A week or so later the IT team received an invoice from the UPS tech for his work. Suffice to say some colourful language and loud phone calls later the invoice was consigned to the rubbish bin, unpaid.
"People getting used to the idea that the car will simply sort everything out so there's no need to pay attention."
This is exactly the problem with Teslas. It's (mostly) not a technology problem, it's the way they are marketed. We all know that no-one reads the manual any more and if you give enough people a feature called "autopilot" then some of them are going to interpret that literally, leading to accidents like this one.
Primarily due to a huge increase in the amount of goods being shipped to the US from China, compounded by decades of underinvestment in the ports themselves so they had no spare capacity, and then the reduced availability of all kinds of staff such as port workers and truck drivers due to Covid-19.
With the limited facts available this sounds like a harsh but ultimately fairly predictable outcome from publicly sharing an opinion about anything remotely controversial in these hyper sensitive times.
Although why people persist in sharing these kinds of opinion and social commentary pieces on LinkedIn, which is supposed to be a network for professionals, is beyond me.
.. And also for bored programmers testing things, as we found at the company I worked for in the late 90s. We generated mailing address data that was printed on labels for catalogs and such. One client was very surprised to receive a sample catalog addressed to "Satan, 666 Devil Street" with various other occult references attached.
Fortunately they saw the funny side.
By way of contrast, I worked for a company a few years ago that had a monthly AWS bill of several million $. We were based outside the US but had a dedicated support manager and three technical consultants from AWS on 24/7 call, plus regular support meetings and NDA briefings on product roadmaps etc. On several occasions we ended up in direct contact with product teams to help resolve issues. We did have some issues with AWS but support definitely wasn't one of them.
Obviously there is no "spending cap" because it would be impossible to implement by stopping all possible activities across dozens of services that might incur a charge beyond some nominal spend limit. Even AWS cannot calculate total spend across a whole account fast enough to guarantee some process that might stop all services in time to prevent a limit being exceeded.
In my experience almost all users of AWS accounts for training or experimentation purposes have no issues keeping within the free tier limits. On the rare occasion someone does exceed the limit (and I have done this myself once by accidentally leaving a database cluster running) a message to support has been enough to have the charge reversed.
Basically if you don't do your homework to understand how free tier services work then you're responsible for the charges incurred, but even then you probably won't have to pay them.
"Setting a price on a product or service that is significantly higher than recent prices offered on or off Amazon"
In other words, if you offer your goods on your own or someone else's website for less than it appears on Amazon you can find your listing suspended or potentially your account banned.
Based on my own experiences with local Oracle sales and licensing teams this is completely in character, i.e. treating their own customers with complete contempt. We all know how hard it is for large enterprises to ensure they're compliant with licensing agreements, especially the byzantine arrangements favoured by Oracle, Microsoft et al. - the good vendors will understand this and work with customers to reach an amicable solution. The Oracle's of this world take a completely uncompromising approach - pay up or we'll pull the rug out from under you! This happens so much I can't understand why people still choose Oracle as a vendor.
The tragedy of efforts like this is that they come from a basically good place. Most people agree that having diverse teams in terms of culture and perspective is beneficial in terms of product design, customer experience and also for a healthy company culture. They understand that to achieve that we need talented people from all backgrounds to feel like they will have an equal opportunity to succeed and enjoy their work.
However banning completely context appropriate and neutral words like "illegal" and "native" doesn't further this agenda at all, the inherent ridiculousness of it undermines real and important work being done to improve diversity and inclusion. Associations like this are why diversity and inclusion efforts are so often met with scepticism and apathy.
Somebody already does pay. According to the last quarterly press release from Alphabet the revenue from YouTube Ads was over 5 billion dollars for that quarter alone. I don't know what their operating costs are for YouTube, but while I'm sure they're huge I'm also sure its not close to 5 billion dollars a quarter.