I seem to recall that the Chinese had a line of really large balloons that may or may not have accidentally flown over the continental USA by mistake and been shot down. Maybe they can borrow half a dozen of those and strap the shuttle to them and airlift it to where it needs to go.
Posts by TrevorH
197 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Sep 2009
How do you solve a problem like Discovery?
Radiant Group won't touch kids' data now, but apparently hospitals are fair game
Scattered Lapsus$ Hunters offering $10 in Bitcoin to 'endlessly harass' execs
Firewall upgrade linked to three deaths after Australian telco cut off emergency calls
As Xi and Putin chase immortality, let's talk about digital presidents-for-life
GNOME Foundation boss exits after just four months
Gadget geeks aghast at guru's geriatric GPU
Oracle VirtualBox licensing tweak lies in wait for the unwary
Re: VirtualBox 7.1 released Sep 9, 2024
There are several "rings" in x86 architecture and OS/2 is unusual in using more than just 2. Most things use 0 for kernel and 1 for user space. OS/2 uses ring 2 as well and not all hypervisors emulate it correctly (or maybe at all). VBox came from Innotek software, a German company that used to write OS/2 software so they made it work.
Innotek got bought by Sun(?) and then acquired by Oracle which is how Oracle ended up with it. I don't think Oracle bought Innotek directly, I think they acquired it via another purchase but I may be wrong about it being Sun.
Firefox is fine. The people running it are not
It's pretty easy, what Mozilla needs is a management team that use a web browser on a daily basis. All day, every day. And they need to be focused on making it easy to use, fast, accurate, cross platform, secure and stable. Not necessarily in that order. Oh, and I guess they need to know how to make money too.
Ubuntu 25.10 and Fedora 43 to drop X11 in GNOME editions
I have seen conversations with people that are very familiar with the X codebase and they were of the opinion then, about 10 years ago, that it was a complete security nightmare that could probably never be fixed completely. They also said that most of those security problems had been known for 20 years, now 30 years, and were as a result of the way it was designed. From that point of view I can absolutely see why they would want to do this. It's also possible that they're sitting on a bombshell CVE that they can't disclose (no knowledge of that here, just speculation).
If they remove X support from Fedora 43, how will that affect all those other Window managers that are listed as alternatives to gnome? For example, can you still run MATE or xfce on a Fedora 43 that has no X support? I don't think wayland support on either is particularly great if present at all.
RHEL 10 quietly leaks ahead of Red Hat Summit
You don't seem to need to do anything special to see if from my login. I get in to redhat.com and go to the download link then to "All downloads" and it shows me all the links to download 10.0 isos, 4 of them, boot, binary, realtime and virtio-win isos plus 2 image files for KVM and WSL2. This is from a free developer subscription renewed about a week ago.
Direct download https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/479/ver=/rhel---10/10.0/x86_64/product-software will require a RH account.
AMD is Ryzen to the SMB occasion with a bundle of baby Epycs
Microsoft tries to knife passwords once and for all – at least for consumers
Nationwide power outages knock Spain, Portugal offline
Don't delete that mystery empty folder. Windows put it there as a security fix
Trump's tariff turmoil leaves IT projects in deep freeze
UK's answer to DARPA sprouts new ideas, like programmable plants
Hm, why are so many DrayTek routers stuck in a bootloop?
Re: Over reaction
That rather depends on what security error your browser was showing. If it's "hey the self signed SSL certificate is... self signed" or, judging by the date on my Draytek's SSL cert, it is baked into the firmware and expires in about a year so not upgrading looks likely to give you a cert expired error. Which might encourage you to go in search of an update...
BT unplugs plans to turn old cabinets into EV chargepoints
Infoseccer: Private security biz let guard down, exposed 120K+ files
Win a slice of XP cheese if you tell us where Microsoft should put Copilot next
Open source router firmware project OpenWrt ships its own entirely repairable hardware
RHEL 9.5 debuts alongside AlmaLinux, Rocky, and Oracle updates
AI PCs: 'Something will have to give in 2025, and I think it's pricing'
The troublesome economics of CPU-only AI
FortiManager critical vulnerability under active attack
CIQ takes Rocky Linux corporate with $25K price tag
OS/2 expert channeled a higher power to dispel digital doom vortex
That doomsday critical Linux bug: It's CUPS. May lead to remote hijacking of devices
AMD reverses course: Ryzen 3000 CPUs will get SinkClose patch after all
AMD won’t patch Sinkclose security bug on older Zen CPUs
MDM vendor Mobile Guardian attacked, leading to remote wiping of 13,000 devices
How deliciously binary: AI has yet to pay off – or is transforming business
Users rage as Microsoft announces retirement of Office 365 connectors within Teams
Update 07/23/2024: We understand and appreciate the feedback that customers have shared with us regarding the timeline provided for the migration from Office 365 connectors. We have extended the retirement timeline through December 2025 to provide ample time to migrate to another solution such as blah blah blah
Is Teams connector retirement a tweak to fit EU laws, or a sign of price rises to come?
They blinked:
Update 07/23/2024: We understand and appreciate the feedback that customers have shared with us regarding the timeline provided for the migration from Office 365 connectors. We have extended the retirement timeline through December 2025 to provide ample time to migrate to another solution such as...
The current connectors use a domain per customer like $company.webhook.office.com and then go on to add another 3 UUID's to the hook url plus another random string that looks suspiciously like another uuid with the '-' characters removed. Total length minus the identifiable company + webhook.office.com is around 170 bytes so it's not what I'd call easily guessable. So first step for anyone wanting to exploit a security vulnerability in a webhook is to guess the 170 character random string so they can post to it. Sure, that's security by obscurity but you need to know the correct url to be able to get to it.