Oh dear
I hope you're trolling. I really do.
231 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Sep 2009
That's perfectly true. But sometimes the clients want a higher MP count. Do they need it? Probably not. But they pays their money, they makes their choice.
These MF cameras are really pro - their primary purpose is to generate income for the photographer, and if they generate it by allowing the photographer to say to the client: "40 Megapickles? I can do that," then they do their job perfectly.
In very general terms, the larger the sensor, the larger the aperture and the longer the focal length, the less depth of field.
Which is why everything is in focus with a compact (tiny sensor, f/4.0-ish max aperture, 10-30 mm focal length) and you have to stop down like a mutha to get acceptable depth of field with a medium format camera (huge sensor, f/2.8 lens, which in the case of a duck was stopped down to f/5.6, 80 mm).
The depth of focus, as you term it, could hardly be called disappointing, much in the same way that the kinetic energy of a 7.62 mm bullet could hardly be called disappointing compared to that of a 150 mm artilery shell. Different beasts entirely.
Looking for noise performance in a MF camera is also very much meaningless - these things are designed to perform superbly at low ISO settings, but for anything else, a Nikon D3s will wipe the floor with them. But at ISO 200, the images from the Nikon will look terrible compared to those from the Hassy.
I do think the sample shots are even worse those usually posted by the measurebators over at DPreview, though. C'mon, El Reg, get me cameras to review, and all the sample shots will be of models that could make the Eee babe green with envy.
"About the same size" is obviously newspeak for "nearly twice the thickness and nearly 50% heavier", then? As to performance, well, I'm quite sure a dual-core Atom will just wipe the floor with Core2Duo.
* before the PC police shoot me in the face, it's a bloody meme, I just substituted the nasty word for a more acceptable phrase.
With 4.1, my factory-unlocked 3G feels young again, and to me, that's all that matters.
(Yes, yes, I know, Apple sux0rz because 4.0 rendered the 3Gs barely usable, yaddayaddayadda, Android FTW, yaddayaddayadda, haha, I'm a tard for paying so much for an inferior product, etc etc etc. Well, my phone manufacturer actually cleans up their mess. How's your Android update for, erm, just about any operator-branded phone going? Not so well? Ah.)
I used iGo on a stand-alone satnav and it wasn't very good, very prone to crashing. Mind you, the satnav was Czech in origin, and the only things they seem to do well is girls and beer. Not an insignificant contribution towards making the world a better place, to be sure, but that doesn't make their satnavs any less rubbish.
Navigon I tried on the iPhone 3G and it works reasonably well, but is prone to crashing. Also, it seemed quite dear for what it did. So then my contract was up for renewal and I bought a Nokia E72.
Ovi Maps, daft name notwithstanding, does the job well, although the maps for my particular region seem to be quite old, but they are very precise. The user interface is nice enough, and the guidance is generally spot-on. All in all, the phone is awful as far as the software is concerned, but the keyboard is great for texting and the satnav works well enough. I'm not buying another S60 phone again, but give me a nice featurephone with a QWERTY keyboard and Ovi Maps, and I, an iTard of the highest magnitude, will happily use it as my second phone.
OS X does home theatre very nicely. And everything else, too, especially for dumb users like yours truly. Or is 2010 yet another Year Linux Takes Over Desktops(TM)?
Of course, halving the price would just make it a nasty little computer like the ones punted by Dell, and we know how successful those are, don't we?
Right. My bad, I meant pictures from that 12 MP phone camera.
Although I like my 10 MP DSLR just fine - shot with an EOS 7D the other day, with its eleventyhundred megapickles, but the tonality was just wrong, and don't get me started on user interface - Canon could learn a lot from Microsoft, and I hate Microsoft's UI design.
Ever seen the pictures from that 12 MP camera? Yes. They suck. All they do is take up memory.
Otherwise, a pretty decent article with some nice insight.
See also:
http://www.iainclaridge.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/merkley2.jpg
Needs moar megapickles, as the fine gentlemen of /p/ would say.
Yes, I'm talking about an office suite that isn't quite as terrible as OpenOffice, an image editing app that isn't quite as useless as the GIMP, and some sense of what's important.
Oh, and yesterday, I saw a truly sad sight. A severely overweight freetard with a GPL 3 T-shirt. I bet that particular piece of apparel has all the pulling power of a snail.
Butthurt much? All the fine specimens of hackerdom you mentioned are perfectly happy to work for free - in fact, I'm sure they evangelise their position to anyone, whether they want to listen or not. Ubuntu use this to their advantage, and to the advantage of their users, who mostly won't give a thimbleful of fresh iguana faeces about who wrote the stuff anyway.
If they actually manage to turn the egofest of criminally abysmal user interfaces that is Linux into something that is viable for consumers, so much the better. Not that I'm likely to switch from OS X anytime soon, of course, but then again, unlike most Linux advocates, I actually use my computer to earn money*.
* for values of money approaching a bloody pittance.
My first Nokia - I had Siemens phones before that, and they were just lovely - was a 6280, with S40. Which was nice, because it was fast.
So, I bought my second Nokia, which was a forgettable S60 handset. Rubbish, absolutely rubbish. Sure, I could install anything on it, but that didn't make it any less rubbish for making calls and texting. And then, because I'm a gadget obsessed moron, I bought the N78, because it had GPS and was cheap. Oh dear lord. They managed to make it even worse. Sure, it was a bloody multimedia computer, but I just wanted a phone with GPS. Which it wasn't. Vodafone customization wasn't helping any, either.
I then bought an iPhone. While I miss a physical keyboard for blind texting, it does everything else superbly. My (recently ex) GF has a Sony Ericsson slider, and if I needed a second phone, I'd buy one of those, their UI seems to be pretty good. But all in all, nothing beats my iPhone for user experience.
Nokia gained their market share with great products. They are losing it with stupid management who believed the Web 2.0 hype.
Oh yes, please, let me have wobbly windows and desktop themes rather than a system that works with, well, you know, real world apps. As in office suites (and no, Open Bloody Orifice does not count, because it manages to screw up even simple Word documents in a spectacular fashion) or Photoshop (GIMP? Knee grow, please ...).
Linux is like the kit Lancia Top Gear tested - great fun to tinker with, looks lovely, shame the brakes jam up after a few laps.
I just knew there would be one of those smug freetards going on and on and on about Ubuntu launch parties.
You know what, I googled them. And this is what came out (links perfectly SFW, but may cause terminal boredom):
http://www.flickr.com/photos/freeculture/sets/72157607438938969/
http://photos.jonathancarter.co.za/v/ubuntu-party-7-04/
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArizonaTeam/Installfest/Jaunty-Tucson
Quite frankly, I'd rather be trapped in a burning bus with Microsoft's stock models than attend one of these.
So please, do kindly shut up about your computer club meetings or at least have the decency to stop calling them "parties".