Well... B.G. don't want Internet to the poor...
...because the poor will not be buying his company's software, they will run on either Android, Chrome or some other Linux.
130 publicly visible posts • joined 1 Sep 2009
Androids problem is that it is not directly compatible with any other Linux, it is the "Windows RT" of the Linux world. We do love Android but it is not the tablet Linux we all would like to have.
Ubuntu is not the leader, the leaders are RedHat, SuSE and Debian everything else is a derivative of one of those.
No we do not want to promote Ubuntu because Ubuntu is not the best solution for anything, it is not even the best UI experience.
As I see it the PC hardware is simply not suited for virtualization, we need Intel-based heavyweight servers which are NOT necessary DOS/Windows compatible. We need hardware supporting much more throughput than DOS/Windows compatible servers can provide. I may be wrong... but again... I may me right.
I've been recently asked by one of our employees if I can get him something better than that Windows-crap he got now on his current work laptop...
...he is now running OpenSuSE. It is really only a platform for running Citrix client but so was his Windows.
I'm in a very good situation where I can give people almost anything I like as long as they can do their work. There are no real corporate policy telling me that we use Windows.
Morale from this short story is... if Windows wasn't bundled there wouldn't be only 1% Linux... there wouuld be probably 10%.