Re: Expert
A lot of these companies have put in firewalls to prevent these models from learning from the public becuase the public teaches them to be little hitlers for a laugh.
639 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Aug 2009
Human lie and helluciate all the time. That has nothing to do with whether these models are intelligent or not.
Lies and helluciations are a problems because they are for profit companies working towards commercial applications where companies don't want their product lying to customers, unless it a company producing sex robots, then you know they will need them to lie.
LLM are all well and good but it will be the companies that narrow down their LLM into doing something useful and controllable and accurately and repeatable that will own that niche.
Teacher,
Doctor,
lawyer
Are the probably going to be the big ones companies will aim for.
Law enforce and military will be the next ones.
Google, Open AI will own the generalist consumer market but they will be to unreliable to be use outside of that.
It took 6 years and a research team of thousands and probably the GDP of a medium size nation to achieve it current success. To me it one of the key components of building what a average person would call a AI, is image recognition. The fact Google Lens is so damn good means we are another step closer to skynet
Many are suing because their content was copied from their servers to "insert a AI company" servers, then manipulated, aka tagged and categorise and then expose to their AI to learn from.
That copying and reusing which is violating copyright law, perhaps.
However if the AI simply learn by browsing the web, even at a billion pages per hour, i don't see that violating copyright, especially if it did it via web cam staring as a screen. Are we close to having such a free learning AI, I don't know, probably not, but who knows.
I raise a eyebrow in reading that report and it hasn't been covered anywhere. A interesting acquisition, I'm wondering if we will eventually see it acquiring licenses to manufacturer a much wider array of computer processors in the coming years. At least enough capacity, we can supply the military ourselves and not rely on imports from Taiwan and US.
I also wonder if eventually it be transferred to the sovereign wealth fund to run rather than kept at the MOD. The sovereign wealth fund would have more interest in expanding it beyond just military applications.
Face that his co-defendent also happen to die this week as well, does raise my suspicions. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/aug/19/mike-lynchs-co-defendant-in-us-trial-fatally-struck-by-car-while-jogging#:~:text=Stephen%20Chamberlain%2C%20once%20Mike%20Lynch's,Cambridgeshire%2C%20his%20lawyer%20has%20said.
You develop your models and are technology outside of the EU, then you do the bureaucratic hurdles jumping afterwards. By that point your tech is so far ahead that the EU tech companies who have had to do the hurdles jumping from day one and US if they follow the EU, they can't compete with your technology anyway once you decide to expand into those markets.
See the Chinese and their electric car technology or even TikTok, where Facebook and US car companies only response is to run to congress to ask for protection.
Fall in results is because everyone fears Israel and it daddy USA is about to have a pissing contest with Iran and short of perhaps OPEC declaring another oil embargo or find another way to say Israel has been punished it assassination, there going to be war in the Middle East.
They simply using pretend poor numbers from the companies to cover it, so normal investors don't panic.