Re: Another refurb mission?
Easy to spend someone else's money, isn't it? The fact is another billionaire DID step up to the plate to pay for a service mission. Nasa said no.
29 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Aug 2009
The long and short is that Nasa administrators would be very happy to see a total failure of Hubble. It's far exceeded it's expected mission duration by several decades and while it's still very very useful, that's money they really want to spend on new toys. Public pressure was the only reason for the last servicing mission.
Noone who's ever been either in front of, or behind an A-10 will ever call it a relic. It's worth remembering that the US marines bought out the UK of all Harrier stock they could get their hands on. And while the UK won't have anything that can fly off their new carrier for a while still (provided pilots weigh in correctly and there's no tail wind, and the computers all work, etc) the marines are still more than happy with their relic jump jets. New in the military is frequently nothing more than a way to funnel public money into rich people's pockets.
as opposed to their only real competition who use russian build motors. A large part of the SpaceX culture is to bring back national pride and employment and not just focus on the bottom line. You did know that the USA hasn't lifted a human in nearly a decade? Next time you go to Walmart or Tesco ... try and find a toaster that's not made in China. Might be well all need a little more of that USA or UK chanting in our lives.
Even Kim Jong Un is smart enough to know not to trust weathermen. C'mon ... they can supposedly predict temp changes of .1C over hundreds of years ... and can't get the weather right 3 days running. The guys with convertibles at work don't check the weather to see if they can leave the top down. They check to see if the old guy in security is limping today. Now there's a weatherman with some accuracy.
I recall well that during the '70s these self same experts of climate were warning of another ice age. Using the same data. You know what the definition of 'expert' is don't you? Someone who knows more and more about less and less until they know absolutely everything there is to know about absolutely nothing at all. I'll take the mathematician ... You might recall it was a mathematician that predicted the utter failure of Jurassic Park.