It may well be. Depends on the protest, and the circumstances; eg during work hours, wearing a company t-shirt, actively encouraging others, causing an obstruction or hindering the company’s activities… any of these could get you fired.
Posts by Lord Elpuss
2313 publicly visible posts • joined 17 Aug 2009
Page:
Protest group says Google has fired more staff over sit-ins opposing work for Israel
Re: King David Hotel
"For a start, I would not start my own country in a place where people have had their own country for centuries."
Such as who? I hope you're not referring to the State of Palestine.
I don't particularly like my client. I don't agree with their political stance, and I don't get on with how they treat their employees as disposable.
But it's my choice to continue working for them. I could choose to leave; but given that I don't, and I continue to bill them every month, I would consider it pretty arrogant to continue to take their money while knifing them in the back. My leverage is to stop working for them if I feel strongly enough.
"...while present, they weren't participating in the protest"
"One anonymous speaker, going by "Oreo," said that they, a Palestinian now-former Google employee with relatives in Gaza, only went into one of the protest sites to meet some of the participants of the sit-in. Afterward, Oreo claimed to have gone outside the building on public property to hold a sign in support of the protest."
I didn't participate in the murder, your honour; I just went round to his house to meet him, and happened to be holding the gun when it went off and shot him. Thirteen times.
Yeah you were a protester, no ifs or buts. And you got what was coming to you.
Voyager 1 regains sanity after engineers patch around problematic memory
IBM accused of cheating its own executive assistants out of overtime pay
I'm confused. Executive Assistant in IBM terms doesn't (or didn't used to) mean anything secretarial; the EA is typically an up-and-coming exec in their own right, 'shadowing' a senior exec in order to gain experience for their own future role. They're also very much not an 'exempt' employee - they're on salary, and a substantial one at that.
An administrative assistant, on the other hand, is a member of the secretarial pool who covers general administrative duties. Often for multiple managers, but the more senior execs get their own administrative assistant (or several).
Watchdog tells Dutch govt: 'Do not use Facebook if there is uncertainty about privacy'
Unintended acceleration leads to recall of every Cybertruck produced so far
Re: Remind me
"Also don't forget the stainless steel they chose is such a cheap alloy that it will rust if it ever gets wet."
The problem isn't that it's cheap; the problem is that it's stainless steel at all; which is patently unsuitable for the job here.
PS it doesn't rust. It stains, which looks like rust but isn't. Stainless steel that... isn't.
Official: EU users can swerve App Store and download iOS apps from the web
Re: If people want to side load crap onto their phone, they can buy an Android
It always surprises me that on a site like the Register, where the commenterati is (presumably) of above-average intelligence due to the technical nature of the site, common sense comments like yours always attract so many downvotes from people who don't even bother to back up their downvote with a justification.
Apple are not the only option in the market; far from it. They do not have a monopoly position. They DO have a product which requires certain safeguards in order to maintain quality and revenue stream. They're entitled to take these measures.
It's that simple. And yet you state that here, on this otherwise intelligent website, and the comments section will accuse you of being a corporate shill and shred you with downvotes.
Job interview descended into sweary shouting match, candidate got the gig anyway
Cloud vendor lock-in is shocking, but there's a get out of jail card
"You seem to presuppose the second source going broke but provide no real argument for this. In fact, the more companies that stipulate second source policies, the more choice we're all likely to have."
I'm not 'presupposing' anything, don't be daft. Companies go bust every day, and there's absolutely nothing guaranteeing that YOUR favourite supplier du jour is exempt in any way. Even Critical Vendor status is no guarantee.
If you want real arguments, how about this: US bankruptcies in 2023 were the highest in fifty years; across practically all industries, including Aerospace, IT and Manufacturing.
FTX crypto-crook Sam Bankman-Fried gets 25 years in prison
"The mastermind behind one of the largest cases of corporate fraud in US history was convicted on seven charges (conspiracy to commit wire fraud on customers and lenders, actual wire fraud on the same"
Without passing judgement on the judgement, so to speak; I legitimately don't understand how you can be convicted of the separate offences of 'conspiracy to commit wire fraud' AND 'actual wire fraud' within the same act. If you conspire but fail to follow through, then ok that is a separate, legitimate charge and I understand it. But if you're convicted of 'actual', that should then encompass the 'conspiracy' part. Otherwise they could create separate offences for each and every part of the planning process.
Seems to me they're padding the charge sheet here.
Unrelated note: my car needed new brake pads recently. I got a message on the dash saying I needed new brake pads. It was abundantly clear that I needed new brake pads. Went to the garage (big Stuttgart-based German manufacturer who shan't be named) and asked for new brake pads.
Got the invoice. €590 for new brake pads, €45 excl. VAT for "Diagnostics" to determine whether I needed new brake pads. Fuck no. If I come to you and say "My car doesn't seem to be stopping well but I don't know what the problem is", then sure charge me a diagnostics fee. But you don't get to charge extra for stating the bleeding obvious. Just like the 'conspiracy to' versus 'actual' argument.
How a single buck bought bragging rights in the battle to port Windows 95 to NT
London Clinic probes claim staffer tried to peek at Princess Kate's records
Exposed: Chinese smartphone farms that run thousands of barebones mobes to do crime
Virgin Media sets up 'smart poles' next to cabinets to boost mobile network capacity
"We asked VMO2 if it intended to provide "appropriate community engagement," even if there is no official need for planning permission.
The company told The Register it always works "closely with Local Authorities before installing new infrastructure and notify residents ahead of works taking place."
So for VMO2, "appropriate community engagement" = putting up a sign a few days before saying telco works will take place here. That's neither 'appropriate' nor 'engagement'; in fact even 'community' is debatable.