Re: Sooner than many think.
But I do wonder how the same car with the same engine and an additional 50-100 kg load of batteries can be less polluting.
If I'm undertaking the same journeys in the same way and consuming less fuel then it's less polluting. There's nothing complicated about that.
But I do have some idea of how that efficiency is achieved:
The unavoidable losses during generation and storage would even make me think that using the ICE engine simply for propulsion can't be much more polluting than using that same ICE engine to also make electricity
You're overlooking the fact that ICE engines do not have a linear performance curve. In particular ICE engines are horribly inefficient under light load. What Toyota's system tries to do is charge the battery at times when the extra load pushes the engine into a more efficient part of its power curve. Thus, at that moment in time the engine is doing more work than it needs to but it's extracting more energy from the fuel than it would have been. The surplus energy is stored in the battery for later use.
Later use can be:
* To allow the ICE to be switched off at low loads.
* Allow a smaller/more efficient engine to be fitted with the battery providing a boost if the driver needs more power. The engines used in Toyota's hybrid synergy drive run on the Atkinson cycle.
But the bottom line is that my driving habits, journeys and journey times are the same as they were before but I consume less fuel. It is undeniable that Toyota's hybrid system works.