Re: It's time people stop buying these things.
How do you know that it's time to do that? Did your watch tell you?
2539 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Aug 2009
That would be good, but wouldn't work in this particular case as the "From" email address is your own.
One day we may have an unspoofable email address scheme running worldwide, but don't hold your breath in the meantime. And, regarding spam in general, I seem to remember many years ago (14 to be exact) that a certain person was saying that spam would be dead within 2 years. Oh yes, here it is:
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/01/26/well_kill_spam_in_two/
Looks like he may have been a tiny bit out with his predictions!
Yep, when I first worked in IT for the local Training & Enterprise Quango the whole place was 10base2 so each cable from the server room connected a dozen or more PCs together.
It was always fun tracing which of the many connections in the pile of spaghetti behind the desks had fallen apart when half an office had suddenly gone off line. These events were usually accompanied by the manager of said office breathing down YOUR neck because one of HIS/HER staff had moved their desk and brought the whole thing crashing down.
But... but... but... Microsoft have been telling us for years that their latest OS is the fastest, best, most secure etc.?
I'm beginning to suspect that they derive their levels of fastness, bestness and most secureness something like this:
secLevel = abs (get_security_level ());
if (secLevel > previousWindowsSecLevel) printf ("Hey look, it's more secure!");
In another life I was a trainee TV engineer back in the last days of valves and swap-out printed circuit boards. When engineers worked on a TV in the workshop there was always a mirror built into the workbench so that you see the screen while working on the TV's innards - of course, the view of the screen was always back to front but we got completely used to that (which probably explains why I can still write backwards). On many TV sets the scan coils that drove the CRT beam horizontally were connected by a couple of single wire connectors and swapping them around would show the picture back to front, so that it became the right way around in the mirror. Pranking this swap while the engineer happened to not be working on a set was not uncommon situation and there were several instances of a set getting as far as the customer's house before the prank was spotted (usually by the customer who was unused to seeing things the wrong way around).
It may be worth exploring a few articles like this:
I haven't tried this myself but I gather people are repoting successful installs.
According to the software giant, the Intel driver was “incorrectly pushed to devices via Windows Update”
So, which idiot or system allowed non-validated code through onto Windows Update? if a person, then why didn't the system prevent this? Let's face it, the whole WU system is completely borked.
Very common! A short while after the ILOVEYOU outbreak I was working for a "famous insurance company" that was (mainly) based in and named after the city I lived in (Norwich). We used remote access from our base in the city centre to the servers in the "lights out" data centre server farms four miles away out on the outskirts. It was fantastic!
Well...
...only for a weird value of "fantastic" that meant that...
...the lights in the server farm were never actualy out because remote access was bloody slow and, for "security", sessions were set to always time out after 15 minutes which, due to the slowness of the network in general and remote access in particular, meant that you barely got more than 20 mouse clicks and 10 fields filled in remotely before the whole thing shut down on you (if it had managed to stay up for the full 15 minutes, itself a rare feat). So, it was often quicker to catch the regular company-provided shuttle bus to the data centre and go and access the server non-remotely (hence the lights never being out as the data centre was full of pissed off people all doing the same non-remote thing).
...I've just had an email from Which asking me to do a survey. One question was: "If you could pick one consumer issue you would like to see Which? campaign on, what would that be?"
I replied with: "Improve the accuracy of articles on your own website. See: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/10/08/smart_camera_which_wtf/"
Hah, that reminded me of the "12 o'clock flashers" of (the rather ancient but still funny) "Internet Helpdesk": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LLTsSnGWMI
Crikey, you're not kidding! The other day I wanted to view and delete a particular cookie as I was testing a website I'm building.
On Chrome it took the following steps:
1) Bring up the Settings screen.
2) Scroll down and click on Advanced.
3) Click on Content Settings (no, not the one below that mentions Cookies but only allows you to clear them in bulk from there).
4) Click on Cookies.
5) Click on See all cookies and site data.
6) Enter the site name in the Search cookies field.
7) Click on the site name to show the list of cookies (a further click takes you to the cookie contents).
8) Click on the X to delete it.
Firefox is marginally easier.
1) Bring up the Options screen.
2) Click Privacy & Security.
3) Click Manage Data.
4) Enter the site name in the search field.
5) Select the cookie and Remove Selected.
However, if you now want to see the cookie contents in Firefox you've now got to use the F12/Developer Options instead, which is a tad annoying.
I'm sure these things used to be far easier to get at in the past - so much for "making our lives easier"! Sigh...