@Ralph the Wonder Llama
Agreed. If they insist then tell them to phuck off!
2539 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Aug 2009
...of the programme numbering of the Burkiss Way (with Burkiss spelt wrong) where they not only started a new series half way through one programme (which is referred to as episodes 31 and 32) but also had two episodes called "Repeat Yourself The Burkiss Way" one broadcast a week after the other where the first few minutes of each were identical and are both referred to as episode 39.
For anyone not familiar, it was a sketch show that was the nearest equivalent to Monty Python on radio and is still often repeated on Radio 4 Extra. See:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Burkiss_Way
Are they related to the elders of the internet?
"My 17.3" laptop goes everywhere with me. It comes on planes with me. It comes on holiday with me. It goes in the car with me. It used to go to work with me (every single day for many years). It's used every single day for the entire life."
Sounds like you and your laptop are in a wonderful loving relationship - are you two married yet?
Looks like 1903 might be delayed anyway (no surprise there) given what ZDNet are saying here today:
"*Some* People in IT rarely seem to be interested in spending time watching what users actually do"
Also, some people, even when told what users do believe them wholly, which becomes their undoing!
20 years ago I was a developer at a company with an educational website. Once, while I was on holiday, one of the junior developers was asked by someone else in the company to produce a specific piece of software to run on the site - the "spec" was verbal only.
When I came back from holiday she told me that what the develope (who apparently hadn't questioned a single thing in the verbal "spec") had produced for her was "exactly what I'd asked for" but "didn't do what I wanted". After that she always came to me with requests so that we could battle our way to a common understanding of what was required and how it would actually look and function.
I suspect there are many of us hoping that "backward" trend continues so that a future version of Windows 10 will have the look and feel of Windows 7, revert an update system that allows us to block individual patches from screwing things up and isn't packed with telemetry snatching crap that phones home every couple of minutes!
OMG Stevie! I remember that exact column. It made me laugh so much I cut it out and kept it for years - not sure what happened to it in the end! Is it online anywhere?
A few years back I did a similar thing regarding the wardrobe in that, just before selling my previous house, I ran out of paint for the wall, so plonked the wardrobe in front of the unpainted bit. As I had no use for the wardrobe in the new house, I asked the new owner if he wanted it. He said yes - I always wondered how long it took him to discover the lack of paint behind it.
I once used one of my cats to help run a new replacement light fitting cable under the floor of the upstairs bedroom in my bungalow conversion. A piece of string was tied to the cat's collar who was then encouraged by my partner to the other end of the 15 feet or so of narrow underfloor passage, which he did quite happily. Once the string had reached the far end it was a simple job to untie the cat and use the string to pull the actual cable through.
My first reaction is to smack my forehead, and think, "What an idiot!"
However, a lot of it depends on the company or organisation that owns/maintains the software/service/device upon which the flaw exists.
If the company is known to be responsible and can indicate privately to the whitehat discoverer that the flaw needs X amount of time to fix (where X might be relatively small for software and probably a lot larger where hardware may be involved) then the discoverer should allow the company that amount of time (+ a bit of leeway) if it sounds reasonable to develop and push out the update. For those companies that are known to ignore such things and only react when the faeces hit the rotating blade type air circulating device then public disclosure should not be held back as that is the only way to get the flaws fixed.
In the end the way a flaw should be reported, patched and eventually made public should depend on an agreed, responsibly thought out timeline for that particular flaw that prioritises public security (and doesn't just pay lip service to it).
With regard to Spectre/Meltdown then El Reg's disclosure was probably timely as Intel has, in the past, been known to downplay things until their hand is forced.
Well then, just empty out their accounts - they might actually start getting the idea then!
It's similar with data backups - people don't do them until they get bitten by losing something essential (though, it does take a couple bites before they really start doing it properly).