"deliver substantial synergies"
Bingo!
2542 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Aug 2009
Sad to hear he has passed on. His spats with Jack Tramiel were quite legendary back in the day.
I loved the story about him having his wife sell the 6501 chips from a jar - apparently, the ones at the bottom were all duff!
https://www.commodore.ca/commodore-history/the-legendary-chuck-peddle-inventor-of-the-personal-computer/
Indeed, but, back in the 1970s, I heard a story directly from someone who experienced data corruption on a system that relied on punched paper tapes for program input. After several tapes became corrupt they finally pinned it down to a bored halfwit poking the occasional random extra hole into the tape with a sharp pointy implement.
One of my previous PCs was an HP with a slightly recessed power button right on one of the top corners. No problem as I wasn't likely to hit it accidentally. However, HP had never reckoned on one of my cats one day deciding the top of the PC looked like a good place for a kip and, with a carefully placed back foot when jumping up, powering off the entire machine while I was working. A thick computer manual resided on top of that PC which was enough to thereafter put the cat off thinking of it as a suitable bed.
James Nicoll summed it up nicely (or not, depending on your point of view): The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore. We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and riffle their pockets for new vocabulary.
Not quite the same but it reminds me when I once had a Commodore 500. No, I DON'T mean an Amiga 500 - this 500 was a "never officially released" computer from around 1982 that did manage to get loose to the tune of a few hundred units several years later. I'd picked one up for something like £25 around 1986. It had the same VIC chip that the Commodore 64 used.
It also had an horrendously slow screen update and scroll speed. One day, not too long after owning it, I managed to track down the reason why. Every time it wrote a value to either the screen or the colour memory it would then execute a loop that read the value back from that memory and compared it to what it had written out in the first place - it would only exit the loop once the values matched. As the screen write went through a RAM vector it was possible to bypass the checking loop to speed things up considerably, though it did make me wonder at the state of the hardware in the first place that required such a weird checking loop bodge to be added in the first place!
There's more on this beast and its family here: http://www.6502.org/users/sjgray/computer/cbm2/
"On Monday, September 23, 2019, the fix for this issue will be available via the Microsoft Update Catalog. On Tuesday, September 24, 2019, the update will be made available via Windows Update and WSUS as an optional update. You can get the update in Windows via Settings > Windows Update > Check for Updates."
It's the 25th and it STILL isn't available in Windows Update! So, I installed it manually...