Not to be pedantic, but...
...we *are* Cro-Magnon. If you want the subspecies our ancestors out-competed, try Neandertal.
1548 publicly visible posts • joined 20 Jul 2009
I grew up with people like 'em, and when they're "bored" (by which, of course, we mean "drunk") they will shoot at anything that looks like being both fun to shoot at, and unable to return fire. They probably won't *hit* it -- the insulator's a big fist-sized lump of glass, and the fiber's just a skinny little cable, so there you go -- but they will definitely take pot shots at it.
The full OED is over a dozen volumes. Each volume is easily a megabyte or two; having once seen them, weighed them in my hands, and had a chance to see just how much tiny print they fit into each volume, I'd be willing to bet each volume is more like ten megabytes at the very least just for the text, exclusive of the fairly complex markup that'd be necessary to correctly represent the content, and the additional font that'd be required to correctly represent the pronunciation guides. I guarantee you there's not one ebook reader in ten which is capable of correctly representing a page of OED print, much less making it searchable in a way that works -- what would take you or me maybe ten minutes of page-riffling is going to take that dinky little ARM in your Kindle from now until the end of the universe, more or less.
Are these good reasons *not* to work out a way of distributing the full OED electronically? No -- but they *are* good reasons why an ebook version isn't going to replace the paper version.
"I actually think most people don't want Google to answer their questions," he claims. "They want Google to tell them what they should be doing next."
So when do you think was the last time Eric "Cyber-Controller" Schmidt spent even as much as five minutes in the world of humans?
Perhaps someone's been reading their recent US political dirty-tricksery history, or is just an X-Files fan (God knows why), and is obliquely referring to some clandestine source at Apple who either gave them the screen directly, or tipped them off where to look for it.
No idea what "code A08" might be, though.
That's nifty and everything, but if the problem is that people are using sweatshops full of *people* to circumvent the CAPTCHAs, and the proposed solution is one which would make CAPTCHAs a lot harder for bots but not even a little harder for humans, then I think I see a slight problem with the whole idea.
Seriously, if I had even a US nickel for every time I've heard somebody whine about how the first-release camped-out-for-a-week-to-get-it only-three-in-the-state gizmo they've just bought doesn't work right, I'd be rich.
The PDF says there's instructions on how to reply at broadband.gov, but I can't find the first mention of it no matter how I look. Granted I'm kind of crap at Google, but I'm not *that* bad, and you'd think I'd be able to find some mention of it somewhere. Am I just hapless? Or are they just slow?
I can absolutely believe we'd see a white-hat type, or even a civilian, prosecuted for striking back at a botnet operator -- this is the United States, after all. If there's a way to be in the wrong on something, then sooner or later, we'll find it.
Javascript browser detection is harder to fool; Opera does an okay job, but it's the only browser I know of that implements the feature natively. I don't know how extensible Safari is, but I can't imagine it being all that likely that either a) it's extensible enough to let you work over the guts of its Javascript implementation in such a way that they're no longer recognizable, or b) Apple's going to implement a "mask as Internet Explorer/Firefox" feature like what Opera has.
I am greatly cheered every time someone suggests a new possibility in male contraception, because it means I will shortly be entertained by watching men get all protective of their ever-lovin' nuts. Like a few ultrasound waves (or, as in the case of an Eastern European doctor who was in the news a few months back, a few volts) is going to rip your balls right off your body, or turn them purple and evil, or make them swell up and rot, or some damned thing.
The fluid you ejaculate is semen, not sperm; it contains sperm (assuming you're producing them and there aren't any blocked tubes or similar), but sperm cells make up a tiny fraction by volume of the ejaculate, so their presence or absence doesn't make any macroscopic difference at all to what comes out the end of your dick.
And, no, you don't need sperm production to orgasm -- hell, you don't even need to *ejaculate* to orgasm, for that matter. For further insight, apply your programmer's deductive reasoning skills on the following question: Why is vasectomy not equivalent to castration?
Or just go on Wikipedia and redress your appalling lack of knowledge. Seriously, how did you make it to adulthood without knowing how your own genitals work?
If you're going to worry about the fifty or a hundred milliwatts of radio waves emitted in short, widely spaced bursts (if that) by the Wi-Fi adapter of an idle iPad, I bet you must be scared as hell of the sun, right? Because in a fraction of a second's worth of full sunlight, you get vastly more incident energy, including long-wave UV and OMGSCARYMICROWAVES!!1!, than you would if you stayed in the basement and replaced your usual tinfoil toque with an iPad for a whole twenty-four hours straight -- even if you had somehow installed a BitTorrent client on that iPad and set it to download the whole series run of 'The X-Files', just to make sure the Wi-Fi antenna never got a chance to cool down.
Or, wait, what's this you're telling me? You read some bullshit neo-Luddite scare story about how wireless radios and cellphones are giving us all testicular herpes cancer of the brain, didn't stop to think it through for even a couple of seconds and weren't mentally equipped to make sense of it anyway, and went batshit stupid with this idea that sleeping cuddled up to an iPad would turn your brains to jelly? -- not that that'd take much in your case, mate.
"...a future in which children may be slightly less sexualised..."
Most child molestation happens at home. I can understand why politicians, with both their institutional cowardice and their personal propensity to be given to levels of cravenness which would put a teacup poodle to shame, do not wish to address that problematic fact, but if we're really talking about how to bring about a future in which children don't tend to have, you should pardon the phrase, more intimate working knowledge of sexuality than most of their elders, then that's the place we should start.
To hear the Boing Boing trust-fund kiddies tell it, Fairey can do no wrong -- he's a buddy of theirs, after all, whereas the Associated Press, being composed mostly of people who have to actually work for a living instead of getting to play with websites and TV shows and what-have-you as they please, is their implacable enemy.