Re: Murph
That wouldn't have been a large American oil company would it?
258 publicly visible posts • joined 11 May 2007
It's because there is no guarantee that the USA will not turn on Selective Availability (yes they have stated new satellites won't support it, but who knows...) or otherwise block GPS should it suit them. Having a Euro navigation system means that both consumer and military applications are not dependant on another nations geopolicies.
@Seanmon
No, he knows *exactly* what an IT contractor is. It's a self-employed, usually competent and skilled individual who competes directly with the large IT consultancies who donate so much money to political parties, and therefore must be punished to ensure he does not get the same tax benefits that the large companies do.
From BT's service status:
"Glencarse - 01738 (estimated clear date 20/11/2015)
Belford - 01668 (estimated clear date 20/11/2015)
North Weald - 01992 (estimated clear date 20/11/2015)
Husband Bosworth - 01858 (estimated clear date 20/11/2015)
Buckland Newton - 01300 (estimated clear date 20/11/2015)
Glenwherry - 02825 (estimated clear date 20/11/2015)
Brenchley- 01892 (estimated clear date 20/11/2015)
Ferndown- 01202 (estimated clear date 20/11/2015)
Treforest - 01443 (estimated clear date 20/11/2015)
Rothley - 01162 (estimated clear date 20/11/2015)
Dinas Mawddwy - 01650 (estimated clear date 20/11/2015)
Ashreigney - 01769 (estimated clear date 20/11/2015)
Watton - 01377 (estimated clear date 19/11/15)
Chichester - 01243 (estimated clear date 19/11/15)
Swansea - 01792 (estimated clear date 19/11/15)
New Cumnock - 01290 (estimated clear date 19/11/15)
Churston - 01803 (estimated clear date 19/11/15)
Colwall - 01684 (estimated clear date 19/11/15)
Painswick - 01452 (estimated clear date 19/11/15)
Lydbrook - 01594 (estimated clear date 19/11/15)
New Cross - 0203 0207 0208 (estimated clear date 19/11/15)
Broadstairs - 01843 (estimated clear date 19/11/2015)
Bayston Hill - 01743 (estimated clear date 19/11/2015)
Burton Bradstock - 01308 (estimated clear date 19/11/2015)
Magherafelt - 02879 (estimated clear date 19/11/2015)
Bunbury - 01829 (estimated clear date 19/11/2015)
Yockleton - 01743 (estimated clear date 19/11/2015)
Lisbellaw - 02866 (estimated clear date 18/11/15)
Alyth - 01828 (estimated clear date 18/11/15)
Epping - 01992 (estimated clear date 18/11/15)
St Boswells - 01835 (estimated clear date 18/11/15)
Midhurst - 01730 (estimated clear date 18/11/15)
Sedgley - 01902 (estimated clear date 18/11/15)
Carrickmore - 02880 (estimated clear date 18/11/15)
Salisbury - 01722 (estimated clear date 18/11/2015)
Walthamstow - 0203 0208 (estimated clear date 18/11/2015)"
Feel free to Google some of the locations to see how all over the UK this is.
USA law specifies as per current interpretation of 14th amendment of the USA constitution (confirmed by supreme court cases) that:
USA law is universal, no other law applies (or exists for that matter).
Not sure how they reach that conclusion from the 14th Amendment which clearly only refers to the USA and it's individual States.
@JustaKOS
Shows the complete idiocy of any automated process. To summarise:
Party A uses a "free for commercial/non-commercial" use image as part of their image A1
Party B uses the same image as part of their image B1
Party B uses an automated process that notices that B1 is similar to A1 and decides this is copyright infringement. It has no knowledge that the matching section of the images is free for use.
Obviously, party B is at fault for not vetting infringement claims before they are sent out, but this is going to be a growing problem.
The Armed Forces employs approximately 180,000 people funnily enough.
http://www.armedforces.co.uk/mod/listings/l0003.html
Microsoft licenses are not concurrent. You have to license everyone who needs access.
Possibly all serving soldiers need a license to access DII
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defence_Information_Infrastructure
The question is, why doesn't the key actually cut off the engine physically(/electrically)? This is not a function that software should over-ride. It certainly isn't a function that should provide a "hint" to a computer that the fleshy part might like the engine to stop.
First you say:
I don't like running with a known vulnerability in my SSL stack for two days, let alone two months. It doesn't take that long to write and test patches.
and then later:
The OpenSSL team owe me nothing, and for all I care can stop their work today - I have the source I need
Then why didn't you fix it yourself, genius?
All the liquid cooled data centre articles I have seen have missed one very important point. Data racks stack servers vertically to achieve high density for a given floor footprint. Putting servers in a liquid bath would appear to limit you to fewer servers in the same footprint, and that's without taking the extra liquid weight into consideration.
So, you get a more efficient cooling footprint, but a less efficient density in the first place. Given that power and cooling costs are effectively passed on, what most data centres worry about is density. This increases their energy efficiency (nice tick box, but nothing for the business profitability) and reduces their maximum loading (and therefore potential income).
Left hand: I won't let you visit a site using SSL unless that certificate is signed by an authority that I already know, and I mostly know commercial authorities.
Right hand: I won't let you visit a site unless it uses SSL.
Real world: grow the fuck up. Not all sites need their traffic to be encrypted. If they do, accept self-signed certificates.
It's time to separate "protecting a site via encryption" and "validating a site via PKI". SSL is (incorrectly?) used for both.
There are plenty of competent companies outside the major names. However, that competence and service costs, particularly when done at a smaller scale then the big boys.
The fact that most customers buy purely on price, choosing to ignore the "better" options, and then complain about the service is often the root of the problem.
Yes, and they managed to keep us safe using genuine, old school trade-craft for years without the ability or requirement to scan all our communications.
The false sense of security and data overload means that a security service that thinks the ability to scan everything means they have solved the issue and don't need to put people on the ground into dangerous places will endanger us all.
We are less safe with mass surveillance, nor more. It becomes a needle in a haystack, rather than intelligent, targeted data gathering.
It just seems easier, that is all. Your attitude is both shocking and depressing.