Ping of Death?
Seriously the ping of death makes a come back in 2013? Talk about crazy.
448 publicly visible posts • joined 17 Jul 2009
Bloody hell... they are really scraping the bottom of the barrel here aren't they... It was bad enough when the drongos against the NBN were twisting the facts and occasionally out and out lying their asses off about cost and technical specs... but this? damn... they really must be felling desperate.
Awesome! This is the kind of science we should be spending money on, not that solar/wind bollocks that will never provide enough power to be viable, science that will provide clean-ish energy!
The only reason I can see to be spending money on "green" (synonymous with useless) energy instead of things like nuclear and technology like this is the hippys without any understanding of technology have too much lobbying power. They don't want clean and efficient energy, they want us all living a "natural" (aka hellish) existence with little to no power usage.
Utterly ridiculous. I can not believe they think they'll get away with this bollocks, all the more proof that lawyers are the ones who are proving the case for IP reform with their over-reaching money grubbing ways.
I've been a fan of games workshop for over twenty years, but at this moment I want nothing to do with the company. Disgusting.
While I don't doubt there is intelligent life out there, somewhere, statistically it's improbable that it doesn't exist... it doesn't mean it would be common, our galaxy alone could have thousands of civilisations at any given time... and they might never know the others exist... to quote the great man, Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is....
Maybe instead of pissing away money the yanks don't have on a study he could simply look at anyone of the dozens of accredited studies that have already been done... you know the ones that show just like any form of violent media, games don't cause violent behaviour, they might escalate it, but the person already needs to be a few bits short of a byte.
But oh no, let's not deal with the real problems like a lack of mental health treatment or controlling access to firearms, let's blame video games and movies... hell why not claim comics cause homosexuality while we're at it! Oh wait... that's already been done.
Sounds great, I thought it was odd games faded out of the curriculum in the '90s, when I was at school in the '80s they were a vital part of teaching kids to use computers, I still remember the entire class sitting around the Apple II taking votes on what to do next in Oregon Trail.
Minecraft is a wonderful game for children, very easy to learn, with a lot to master, and most importantly it wasn't designed to be an "educational" game. Those "games" tend to be aimed more at the parents then at the actual kids playing it.
Frankly I've never been very impressed with the DNC register, and this story doesn't make me feel any better. I've been listed on it for years and I still get obnoxious calls, either scams, or from groups that have an "exemption" (Religious, Charity, Political).
Frankly if I don't have a preexisting relationship with an organization and I'm on the DNC they should not be allowed to call me full bloody stop, I don't care if you want to save the whales, ban the boats, or whatever other bollocks you're peddling, stop bothering me!
Good. I don't want dictatorships and fundamentalist states dictating to the civilized countries that invented and developed the internet into what it is; we've got enough trouble keeping our own "Think of the Children" and "let's all live in the 5th century" idiots under control, last thing we want is some backwards prats telling us how to do things.
Good for them, too many people forget that copyright when it was originally envisioned was viewed as a necessary evil, a far from perfect system, but still the best solution to the problem of rewarding creators but still giving people access.
It's like democracy or the western justice systems, flawed systems to be sure, but still better then everything else we've tried in those areas.
Unfortunately if the extremists on either side aren't put in their place we'll either see a death of large scale content (stuff that costs tens of millions to produce) or the death of customer rights and small scale content. It really sucks, because the current system badly needs reform, the length of copyrights at the moment are stupidly long, leading to works being lost forever (and damnit, haven't we lost enough of our culture?). Hell some of the Sherlock Holmes books are still under copyright!
I hope to see more moderates making their voices heard!
You left out one of the major reasons for the ban to stay... PROFIT. If customers are prevented from using their own devices they'll either use the ones provided (such as in-flight movies) or other ways to dull the pain of travel (booze!).
Who the hell would use those stupid airline provided things if you could use your own stuff?
Yeah this is really going to help his business... Streisand effect anyone?
When I look at reviews I don't just look at the good ones, or the bad ones, I look at the general overall tone of the entire grouping. I expect there to be a few bad ones, because of everything from personality conflicts to simply bad days, what I'm mostly interested in is the general tone of the reviews.
Let's look at amazon book reviews for an example, if there are a bunch of 1 star reviews or a bunch of 5 star reviews, with nothing in the middle, I know something hinky is going on.
A 1 star review or a 5 star review isn't going to give me much information really, but at 3 or 4 star review? That's where I find out what the real deal is.
As galling as letting a factually incorrect review stand, assuming it is factually incorrect, it's far better then throwing a hissy fit and suing is just going to make you look like a wanker who can't take criticism, and there is no way I'm hiring a company with a history of suing people over crap like that.
Simply guarantee government funding for anyone who can raise X amounts of signatures, give those people guaranteed air time on media (limited), and then ban any contributions from any source over say 2,000$.
There fixed. It might cost the tax payer cash in the short term, but it would be well worth it in the long term to prevent the lobbyists from having so much damn influence.
Yeah... how dare someone suggest that the current system is broken and offer reasonable suggestions on how to fix it... Damn dirty commie infiltrator!
This is the problem with the whole debate, you've got Big Content on one-side completely against any form of restructuring, you've got the FreeTards on the other side wanting to completely demolish the entire system, and anyone in the middle offering reasonable compromise is smashed like a grape under a hammer.
The current system is broken, it needs fixing, throwing away people who recognize that but don't want to rip the whole thing down isn't a good move.
Asimov's laws are good... but they are very dangerous in the real world.
Example, humans eating junk food is bad for them, robots then should enforce nutritional standards on humans... humans order robots to let them eat junk food, robots rightly consider that order to be invalid because of how the second law is worded in regards to the first law...
That's just one example of robots taking control over humans using those laws. There are many many more. Think the Nanny states are bad now? Wouldn't be a patch on a robot run world.
One of my major concerns with remote or robotic warfare is it makes war "too easy", at least politically. Now don't get me wrong, I don't want to see dead soldiers coming home on the news anymore then the next person, but the fear of those images keeps politicians, at least the ones in the first world, hesitant to go to war, and that hesitation is a very good thing (though not without it's drawbacks) for the world.
If the politicians can order a war with very little risk to their own political standing, that is a very bad thing, a destabilizing thing for the world at large. Really the only control we have over our political "masters" is their fear that we will not vote for them next time... we really don't want to let that go.
I wonder if they factored in convenience. Look at eBooks for example, one of the least pirated items, it is generally very easy to purchase them legitimately... same as music... but then look at TV and Movies, both a massive PITA to access legally due to geolocking for example, with lots of hoops to jump through before you start watching.
When it is simply easier and quicker to go to a torrent site and download the latest episode of a TV show, then the content providers have failed somewhere along the line.
Cost and Convenience matter! Make it easier to pay for content then pirate it and watch the piracy rates drop.