Oh Dear
How can this possible not be an epic failure?
Microsoft - still not learning...
850 publicly visible posts • joined 14 Jul 2009
MS had better get used to this, I have a feeling it's going to happen more and more as competitors start to offer a viable alternative to the Windows/Office monopoly.
As for the vitriol they are spewing on the blogs, how does the saying go...? First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they attack you, then you win.
Last time I installed Firefox, some junk McAfee security website vetting nonsense appeared by magic, without asking me and without announcing itself. First I saw was when Firefox started declaring which sites it thought were suitable for me to visit.
On the other hand, FF should NOT be activating these plugins if it finds they haven't been installed by the user. What, 20 lines of code to implement this?
How easy would it be for some malware author to use this mechanism to slip a bank-account sniffer into the browser? The percentage of users who wouldn't notice this - or know what to do about it - would probably make it worthwhile.
I'm sure we all remember Bill Gates' and his hilarious on-stage USB "demonstration".
Whatever the bitter and twisted anti-Apple-tards might post in these articles, Apples resurgence redefined the PC industry - and that's why *every* major tech company is now scrambling to keep up with them.
A pint for Mr Jobs.
Zuckerberk and his nauseating website are the embodiment of everything that is wrong with modern corporations. He doesn't have customers or users, he has pieces of data to be sold and manipulated for his own ends. And he's fooled them into willingly handing that data over of their own volition.
The sooner Facebook and everything it stands for disappears, the better. Sadly, peoples inherent need to pimp their egos on a daily basis means that won't happen.
He did a very foolish thing. Free Speech doesn't include sending bomb hoaxes, and the users of Twatter need to learn that having a Twatter account doesn't give you free reign to say anything you want to and not expect repercussions.
Don't threaten to blow up airports in a public forum. Nuff said.
"Google said it's preventing data from moving between Gmail and Facebook because it believes data should be set free."
This doesn't exactly conjure up images of little packets of personal information flitting from tree to tree. Both of these companies want to harvest all this data for their own money-making and nefarious purposes. They just don't like each other doing to their own data.
Handbags at dawn. In the meantime, I'll keep my list of friends away from both of them.
It all sounds very nebulous to me - vaporvalue, if you will. What is Facebook worth? It's worth what someone might be prepared to pay for it, or what Zukerberk might be prepared to sell it for. But it's all theoretical - as you say, one mighty lawsuit will change these notional values overnight.
Whatever cash Zukerberk has in the bank, I still can't understand where it came from. I mean, I'm sure he isn't selling information on his userbase, fr'instance.
Yeah, but Microsoft's mobile and tablet products were crap. Only the most rabid of M$ apologists will try and compare Windows Mobile - in all it's myriad of incompatible guises - to iOS. And XP-based tablet machines were a commercial failure. I saw one, and it was junk.
Now that their competitors have shown M$ how it's done, they have plenty of inspiration to copy - as per the standard MS business model - and so WP7 might be mildly successful. However, like it or not, everyone but M$ has made mobile computing a success. Apple et al are not the Johnnie-come-lately, here - Microsoft are the tail-draggers.