
Fees going up?
If he thinks the members will put up with fees going, I'm sure there is a spot in the unemployment line he can take.
His definition of "internet" could be insulting to the ones who made it happen. It was supposed to about being multi-homed and not telco lock in. Today there are only about 30,000 address ranges in the entire wold that meet that requirement and most of them are ISPs based on my BGP route paths which includes 972,000 v4 and 207,000 v6 advertised routes.
The fees are already way too high by a significant factor and once the v4 numbers run out, there is almost no need for them at all.
IPv6 assignments should be 3${country_code}:${company id in hex}::/56 with reverse dns at ::53. Then there is zero benefit for their existence and no need to pay some of the salaries APNIC pay. Plus a company could take its allocation to a different ISP or even use several providers at once.