Re: Linux,
Is Wondows 11 as good as Windows 10 yet, or is it still catching up?
139 publicly visible posts • joined 8 Jul 2009
On a tangent - the Institute of Physics lets members sign up for a mailbox with a physics.org email address as part of the membership fee. Unfortunately, it's M365 through Daisy Communications. They sent everyone a letter saying they were going to withdraw access using Outlook for security reasons, leaving only webmail. It's an amazing coincidence that turning off Outlook app access means they drop to a lower cost tier at Daisy, but IOP insist it's all for security (apparently using Outlook to access M365 must be insecure).
Greenpeace have a plan to deal with high energy prices in the UK: https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/resources/power-shift-report/
We also need more energy storage and improvements to the grid between England (where more energy is consumed) and Scotland (which has loads of spare renewable energy from wind and hydro)
Try using the Mullvad browser, that should make you less fingerprintable: https://mullvad.net/en/browser
TZP shows lots of things your browser is leaking: https://arkenfox.github.io/TZP/tzp.html
and the original panopticlick, now called Cover Your Tracks: https://www.eff.org/pages/cover-your-tracks
https://github.com/arkenfox/user.js/wiki/Appendix-B-Test-Sites-%5BFingerprinting%5D is useful to see how well your protection is working, but does have the caveat:-
> Any probabilities or entropy from test sites are COMPLETE NONSENSE
https://arkenfox.github.io/thorin/items/01aboutfingerprinting.html?view=presenter#50
> "No individual can buy their way in or simply turn up at the event," he added.
1. I have taken part in Council consultations. They usually go on to say that their scheme has been through consultation but deliver what they originally planned.
2. Ordinary people might not be motivated or even available. People who are independently wealthy or backed by a pressure group could get coaching in how to effectively present their case, whilst not needing to take time off work
3. I bet the consultation involves having to travel to London.
4. Many people selected to attend might not be aware of the potential problems, eg someone who owns an ordinary Android or iPhone might not realise that the app is likely to block installation/being run on an aftermarket Android variant (eg GrapheneOS, LineageOS), and not at all for people who have an alternative operating system (eg Sailfish) or for people with dumb phones or no phone at all
5. And will the Government be honest in the consultation and reveal exactly what the app will store? As far as I remember, Germany restricts what can be stored on ID cards because of their experience. Name, age, photo/biometric info, and a unique ID should be enough.
Playboy published a lot of science fiction: https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?24780
For example, Arthur C Clarke: https://arthur-clarke-fansite.blogspot.com/2007/05/wind-from-sun-18-stories.html and https://findingaids.library.tamu.edu/index.php/wyps-nq5e-3twh
> One year, a little girl was tasked with stomping on stage to shout "Please stop, I'm bored!" whenever a winner went on for more than a minute.
I thought Miss Sweetypoo was there every year.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xAnVNXaa5oA
https://improbable.com/tag/miss-sweetie-poo/
He promised to die on Mars, just not on landing. I imagine a Mars colony run by Musk would look like the one in the original Total Recall, with the actual workers having the risk of having their air terminated, whilst the corporate fatcats do drugs and prostitutes whilst getting very rich.
There's nothing saying you can't have both a Hubble replacement and a national pride spacecraft capable of beating China to do something.
However, parking a 14 storey building on the Moon with only a lift to get down to the ground seems daft. I wonder if much ketamine was consumed that day.
At the end of the day, Congress is responsible for NASA's budget. SLS allows Government money to go to NASA contractors not associated with Trump, and spreads the money across the country. The lander (whichever one is selected), will, as you say, funnel money to Trump supporters and be concentrated in certain areas.
America has signalled that it's not interested in scientific research unless it somehow says that vaccines are dangerous, or that fat is good for you, or that burning oil doesn't cause global warming, so there's an opportunity for the rest of the world to reduce its dependence on America and to fund scientific research tthemselves.
The USSR couldn't believe what was being claimed for the US space shuttle - both the design and the planned launch cadence were daft. Whether they actually believed it was supposed to be an orbital bomber with amazing cross-range ability or just said that to boost funding for their own shuttle, I don't know, but at least the Soviet shuttle launcher didn't have solid rocket boosters (it used Ukrainian rockets instead), and could be used to launch non-Shuttle payloads (as long as the guidance on those payloads was facing in the right direction). I think it also had ejector seats for the crew.
Given how SpaceX haven't managed to demonstrate getting 19 Starship tankers into orbit, and decided not to go to Mars despire their dear leader saying he would like to die there and promising a landing years ago, I'm not sure SpaceX could get its act together in time.
Why don't senior management propose that, to save money, they replace themselves with AI? After all, LLMs have been trained with the finest MBA material available on the Internet. We'd only need senior management to shake hands with customers/suppliers, take them to football games, and to attend awards ceremonies, and those roles could be outsourced.
This feels like a protection racket, except that if a significant amount of chip manufacturing moved from Taiwan to USA, China could feel happier about invading (less impact on their own supply chains when Taiwan nukes its own chip factories) and America could feel happier about not providing any defence.