Re: "the smartphone will need to install and run a specific scanning app and media player"
You already have an unknown name
Rubbish! They're very well known. I buy all my handbags from them.
4578 publicly visible posts • joined 8 Jul 2009
Useless advice - are we now supposed to keep parallel, identical computers running?
I do. They're not identical in terms of content or scale but they are identical in installed software and general configuration. They're close enough to be a canary in the coal mine, for my software development QA as well as for vendor patches and upgrades. I accept it might not be achievable in everyone's environment, and certainly not even in all of mine all of the time, but I always aim to get such an arrangement agreed in the original project plans and budgeted for. If the project manager or the beancounters turn it down and something subsequently goes wrong, my arse is covered.
Except it didn't actually cost £0
OK, so on average it cost each of us £10-15 a year, or whatever that actually works out to when spread across the population with an income. And if you're earning less than the personal tax allowance it only cost you a thousandth* or so of whatever you paid in indirect taxes in a year. Sounds like money well spent to me.
*I've no idea what it costs to run PAYE but £700m out of the Government's annual spending of ~£700bn should be on the right order of magnitude.
Well, there was that time when I got so pissed off with my creations that I drowned them, babies and all. I thought I was doing the right thing by letting one good, righteous man and his family survive, along with a bunch of animals, but no sooner had the waters gone down than he got drunk and flashed his willy at his kids. Useless tosspot.
I probably should have been clearer: I want the rich to contribute more, just as they're supposed to do now. I don't want to see the end of tax bands or the end of personal allowances. Your same-rate system proposes that, and I don't think that would be good for the many, only the few. Unless, of course, you've got a clever proposal no-one has tried before. Have you?
So someone earning £10k a year should pay the same final percentage as someone earning £10m a year. Is that also regardless of age? Is that going to include asset appreciation and/or capital gains over the course of that year? Will there be any write-offs or business expenses? Ownership transfers to other reporting entities?
The problem with ripping up current tax regulations and starting again is that you quickly end up reintroducing additional rules to handle the same situations which arise as before. It's generally better to look at fixing existing loopholes, not that there's often the political will to do so.
Non-citizens already effectively pay more tax, since they're not eligible for the same services as are citizens. You probably don't want to start scaring off the doctors and nurses we need by telling anyone thinking of working here that they will be visibly taxed more heavily than the locals.
Until they decide that they are just paying the statutory minimum.
It's written into my contract. If they try to force me into accepting a new contract I walk, taking the money with me. That's why I said it was a weight off my mind.
Sorry the part of the company that paid the pension went bust.
My pension fund isn't managed by my employers. This is why I said I pity the people younger than me, who've not been given the option of having similar arrangements.
I'm going to guess that you are one of those younger people, never knowing the level of security which your grandparents (and probably your great-grandparents too) fought for. That's why you find it so difficult to recognise what I described. It's not really your fault because it's all you've ever known. However, you and your peers can try for something better. I hope you do.
I am very very glad my pension gets paid in less than a year!
I become eligible for early retirement this summer, which by happy coincidence is the month after my length of service qualifies me for the maximum possible redundancy payment. I don't want to ever have to rely on either condition but it will be a weight off my mind.
I feel really sorry for the people 20+ years younger than I am, who've seen their employment terms and pensions gutted and have never really known the expectation of any sort of future stability. Sadly too many people have forgotten that there was a reason why we as a society introduced pensions and other safety nets, while other people have been only too eager to replace long-term stability for the many with short-term gain for the few. My only consolation is that I've never voted for any of those bastards.
I understood that Aids/HIV was an early attempt by a letter agency to eradicate certain sections of society
Damn, now you've let the cat out of the bag! Quick, tell me, I need to know who led you to understand this. Was it the Illuminati or the Zeta Reticulans? I'll soon put a stop to their plot to undermine me.
Traitors, every blasted one of them.
And the fact Jeremy 'Two-Face' *unt is trying to get Germany to lift their ban on selling arms to the Saudis.
“Just as the United States was the first to reach the Moon in the twentieth century..."
The Russian Luna 2 mission was the first probe to land on the moon, in 1959; the American Ranger 4 didn't make it for another three years. Even if you only count soft landings, the Russians got there first in 1966. But naturally Pence was referring just to manned landings, 'cos that's the only thing which counts, right? That's why nobody's bothered for the last 47 years.
simply pack your radioactive material in some material that will readily grab that electron
Or just shield your radioactive material as normal, so that the alpha particle doesn't get as far as air in the first place.
This does seem more like a way of scanning for leaks rather than for looking for contraband materials, especially given the potential distance component. Not to say that contraband couldn't leak, but you'd expect considerable precautions to be taken by the smuggler anyway.
Actually, with that much money going to waste, I was thinking that for a posh school it sounds more like a launderette. You know, the sort of launderette which takes the children of Russian oligarchs on the understanding that the grateful parent will donate very generously to the registered charity providing the educational opportunity, and possibly even use their extensive international business contacts to recommend a service agency capable of handling outsourced IT and administrative functions for the school, all with no questions asked about the surprising scale of the multi-million pound contract. But I could be wrong.