Re: Can it improve the Harry Potter books?
oh god oh god oh god oh... I'm just glad there isn't a Hell.
4697 publicly visible posts • joined 8 Jul 2009
I haven't seen it for almost 30 years, because I decided I would only let myself watch it that once after the initial broadcast in 1980. Some things are just a bit too much and you never forget them.
I once met Alan Alda at a science festival and was going to ask him a question about that confessional scene, but I chickened out in case I started tearing up regardless of how he answered.
"AI fails at basic stuff. Fiction is much more complicated."
I gave one of the LLMs (I forget which one now) several plot, setting and character prompts and asked it to write a short story based upon them. After it churned that out, I asked it to write another after modifiying one of the prompts, and then a third. As storytelling, each result was miserable; as creative writing, each was appalling. The interesting thing was that in each story it re-used some terrible phrases (like "iron-handed" and "hammer-striking") in contexts that I have never seen in 50 years of reading the prompted type of fiction. Fuck knows what it was trained on to get those results.
I do draw some small comfort from the timescale: this AI project will have collapsed in recriminations and legal challenges at just about the time when I will be claiming my state pension. Of course I might then be just one of a hundred thousand people trying to resolve any problem by calling the reinstated helpline that will probably only be manned by three knowledgeable personnel. But at least they won't be trying to turn me into a Nazi if I say the wrong thing. Probably.
Are we sure that that wasn't one of his NFT scam images? Or maybe he was talked out of publishing it by Stephen Miller. "Forgive me, My Leader, but although the lightning bolts truly signify your magnificence and innate potency they might be misconstrued by the little people. The glorious day has not yet come in which we can fully announce your natural suzerainty over humanity to the world."
I don't imagine executives and manglement generally have a clue how much damage disgruntled employees can inflict on a business in a myriad of subtle and largely imperceptable ways — death by a thousand cuts.
It would be wonderfully ironic if the most efficient way of damaging the business was for disgruntled employees to get AI to do all their work.
I used to work at a university, back in the days when email was newfangled and shiny rather than the semi-torturous curse that we've since discovered it to be. I got a call from someone who had joined the faculty a couple of weeks earlier, and for whom I'd set up a new PC and given her a basic run-through just to get her going before she could book one of the introductory courses appropriate for her.
"Hi, Rich11, it's Sandra X. You remember you set me up with email a fortnight ago? Well, I've got one through today and it's telling me if I don't forward it on to everyone then I'll get seven years bad luck. Is that true?"
"Hi Sandra. Nice to hear from you. Remind me, please, but don't you teach philosophy?"
[Small voice] "Oh."
Sometimes people's normal critical faculties get short-circuited when faced with unusual situations, with things completely outside their prior experience.
The wheelie chair.
Been there, done that. Fortunately all such instances happened in my younger days, when four flat screens wasn't the norm but a 70lb 22" CRT bought by high-ego budget holders was not uncommon. In a three-storey block unequipped with a goods lift gravity was never their friend.
My brother bought his daughters laptops when they started secondary school. He told them that he'd installed key loggers so that if he ever had any suspicon that they weren't being sensible about using the laptops, regardless of whose network they'd connected to, he'd always be able to check (they had already been taught about safe behaviour in chat rooms, etc, at school). And then he talked about security and the risk of dodgy sites with iffy content dropping spyware et al, and that if they did do something careless they risked losing all their schoolwork and photos and videos, etc, and maybe even bricking the hardware so that they'd have to go without a computer for months until he could afford to buy a replacement. That was enough to scare them into being careful -- well, at least as far as we know, but they're grown up now and haven't turned into fascists or pick-up artists or anorexics or bankrupts or anything but normal well-balanced adults.
Given the subjective nature of theology*, whether or not something contains verifiable theology is entirely incidental.
*Yes, I am aware that objective arguments can be built in theology, but even those rely upon subjective assessments being agreed between theologists first.
Reform couldn't balance their last manifesto budget, yet in this last year it hasn't stopped Farage from announcing even more populist policies he has no way to pay for.
Anyone who thinks that if he gets into power he will abandon the economic and regulatroy policies which benefit his wealthy backers rather than the ones which benefit the poorer sectors of society needs to stop outsourcing their brain to LLMs and GBeebies.
The opposite of 'Christian moral code' is 'non-Christian moral code', not no moral code. At least try to make a sensible argument.
You might also try reading this year's World Happiness Report before claiming that any particular religious moral code is the primary driver of a happy society.
R V Jones wrote 'Most Secret War', which to me is by far the best description of the scientific and technological arms race that took place in the first half of the Second World War. It's not just an outline of technical events, but also a record of the battles the scientists fought with British politicians, bureaucrats and high-ranking military officers. On top of that, the combat risks that some of those people took, even those usually dismissed as boffins or back-room boys, are stomach-churning. I cannot recommend the book highly enough.
According to official figures, US GDP per capita is double that of Europe.
Some of that GDP comes from the artifically inflated cost of internal trade, such as the high prices American clinics and hospitals have to pay for pharmaceuticals patented and manufactured by American corporations, or the excessively convoluted requirements made for the maintenance of defence materiel by Lockheed and Boeing, such as the F-35 fighters or the Minuteman-3 ICBMs.